Message from @pennypal
Discord ID: 630913995766890497
Everything in philosophy you're very tightly knit
Bro
Let me bring the partners in crime argument
Brb
@Deleted User Listen you are still experimenting with your intellectual powers but you need to relax and stop acting like your some overpowered Mega-mind individual that thinks everything you know is right and if anyone dare to argue against it must be refuted. Everything you are saying isn't true its expressed because that just what you believe in and i respect that. Don't argue with people and try to drown out the conversation by saying they are wrong.
@pennypal Philosophy paves the way more science, it's that simple.
So then we decide who is immoral and guilty according to marjority rules?
King if you don't get out this channel I'm going to send an even stronger argument
Philosophy is the "why" and science is the "this is why".
I’ve yet to hear an argument for an objective morality which holds up to scrutiny. The most convincing objective moralities stem from a belief in theism, and I don’t think someone can empirically prove the existence of a God, they can only rationalize it’s existence, so it’s insufficient for asserting that all should follow that particular moral code. @Deleted User
GG @fuck12moredeadcops, you just advanced to level 7!
You heard an argument for subjective morality that holds up?
There is no objectiely "correct" thought.
There.
That’s the other option. @pennypal
And people certainly assert morality
Either it’s objective or subjective
It’s not neither
All ofour thoughts are from emotions, experiences, and relations.
@fuck12moredeadcops
1) If there are no moral facts, there are no epistemic facts
2) There are epistemic facts
3) Therefore, there are moral facts
Why would it be impossible to have epistemic facts without moral facts?
It should be simple, right?
Good question and it's one which I can't explain in a paragraph. So either we have to vc tomorrow or I can give you a book to read.
If morality is not objective then it's based on majority rule or authoritarian mandates... And it's changeable...
Then it's not moralitity. Morality has to be mandated from an external source
Yeah we’ll talk about it sometime
@pennypal Again, give me an example of a morally correct action that is inheritely correct
It's called the partners in crime argument
Because it’s an interesting idea to me that we have no epistemology without ethics
Raping toddlers is always wrong forever
Objective
And if you want in depth break down of it
Why? @pennypal
No, the whole Idea of rape being bad is only because it's bad for the advancement of people.
Then again,
Rape isnt bad for everyone.
I didn't say it was bad for everybody