Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 438634999298785280
That still doesn't rebuke the crux of the argument, but on the other hand, I think that's a point made disingenuously, anyway.
I see you point that blacks have lived better in America than they have in Africa and that would have improved their IQ's through that envirionment to a extent how ever you need to rember that envirionmental factors have had at most 50% influence with regrads to IQ and keep in mind that is a liberal estimate.
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/iq-and-socio-economic-status/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-iq-and-poverty/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-and-stress/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/stereotype-threat/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/race-intelligence-and-nutrition/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/12/23/race-iq-and-lead/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/transracial-adoption-and-the-black-white-iq-gap/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/10/the-flynn-effect-race-and-iq/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/25/child-abuse-and-racial-differences-in-crime-and-iq/
You're talking about a measured statistic that barely even existed 100 years ago.
We don't have a real measure of the IQ of European society as it developed. We don't even have a measure of IQ in colonial times, or anything of the like.
Your sample group is limited, and your source is biased.
This explains why Europeans are the way they are. What is your argument against it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P78Zd8265_k
My argument against it is that I refuse to accept Alt-Hypothesis as a source. Find me a neutral one.
Wordpress...
It's a PDF copy of a book
My argument is that IQ among the races is mostly genetic like it is between the sexs. If you have some stuff that shows otherwise I would like to see it.
Yes it's a book that makes my case.
Only in part.
That is?
I haven't fully read the book, but these two authors disagree (at worst) on something vital, here
bleh. I can't be bothered to argue this tonight. I've got work in the morning and stuff to do. :/
Heaven forbid you break out the Nuremberg laws chart again. lul.
Good one. I hope to talk to you again some other time.
statistically i'm gonna join Aussie on the race : IQ thing
but primarily due to the Flynn Effect,
in which proper nurtition and education generates a smarter generation to teach the new generation, causing the IQ of the population to increase,
And with places like Africa being shitty, they wont have the same level of nutrition and education, so they fall behind
give a few generations in the same type of environment and that gap disappears
>when you fail to realize that in the previous two, then went to aid and fight along side the people who call them heroes, and in the last they are actively fighting to kill those people
You know, hitlar and Stalin had a working relationship until hiltar pissed him off. People generally stop referring to you as friend or partner when you start attacking them
>When you don't know about the American colonization society was a thing (an organization that helped blacks move back to Africa that had many famous members like James Monroe) and about the transfer agreement of 1933 between Germany and zionists to move jews to Palestine now Israel.
Also, your argument on IQ? Is general. If IQ being low is bad, then you should be wanting to kick out everyone below a certain level. If you just go "kick out all groups of people who's average is below x", you kick out people who are above that point while keeping people below that point.
If someone is planning to invade you I think it's a good idea to attack them first which is what Hitler did. Stalin planned on Invading Germany if you don't believe me look up operation thunderstorm.
With regards to IQ that is ridiculous whites have an average IQ of 100 which is a pretty good level and we can raise it with eugenic policies like encouraging smart people to bread, no need for jew or asians.
Ah, eugenics. Don't want to be allowed to have a child do you?
We don't have to go that far we can just give incentives to smart people to bread. Over time that alone will increase the average IQ level, it all depends on how fast we want to do that and what society will except.
Hmmm, and who gets to control this? And who is a smart person?
Because I gotta tell you, I know some pretty smart people who, the moment they haven't read it in a book, are real fucking dump.
The goverment can give loans to people of a certain IQ and the more children they have the less they have to pay back like National Socialist Germany.
IQ is the measurement of intelligence.
Oh, so you want to give democrates the power to encourage black people, your apparently personal enemy, to breed?
If you mean alot of people are doing badly in the society yes I would agree with you there/
I know a lot of white people who are doing pretty badly in society too. We getting rid of them too? Or are you just changing the color palette of the criminals?
I know plenty of blacks who contribute to society way more than you are. So why should we keep you or me over them?
You know blacks have a lower average IQ then whites right? I want to encourage non whites to return to their homelands like blacks in Africa and Asians in Asia.
You know that if that statistic is true, it only holds true as an average.