So he could have simply selectively enforce the laws he wants.

@DrYuriMom the US is one of a very few number of countries that requires taxation of income, not earned/generated in its jurisdiction. This is the reason that the US noes not participate in the multitude of double taxation treaties. US is one of a few countries trying to exert its law outside its jurisdiction. Right now the EU is trying to fo the same thing.

A classic example is the global reach of the US law Sarbanes-Oxley

Federal Tax Brackets < Consumption Tax

@Walsp @RyeNorth @Rabbi Shekels @DrYuriMom Anyone wanna talk about the co-opting of words by the humanities, The development of Far-left liberal ideals in academia, and the influence of Russia in Black lives matter. Come join me in chatroom 2 I will moderator it a bit.

Is the use of medical tools to enhance human beings morally troubling?
how the hell can you say anything other than no

like i have no clue how to make tis in to many pages

@DrYuriMom There are already rulings about the 14th, wich was only done to allow Slaves to become US Citizens. That was the thought behind it. Now the Left Extremist and corporatists misuse and abuse it to get citizen rights to illegal Aliens. Tje Justicar did an interestint take.

so in short: How its done today is bullshit and was never intended to be that way

The Supreme Court rules in 1898 that the equivalent of today's illegal aliens, the Chinese, we're guaranteed birthright citizenship by the 14th. It goes back a LOT further than the current debate.

Again, anyone here is subject to US law except diplomats with immunity. That's the whole point of diplomatic immunity- to remove people from jurisdiction of the host country's laws.

Wrong

the Chinese was a Resident

Wong was a legal Resident of the United States, not an illegal alien

If you want to remove people from the 14th without another amendment you need to remove those people from our laws. Ie a treaty granting everyone from a country immunity from our laws.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHNp8MAaNBM

they're illegal. pretty sure they're already removed from our laws because they have not complied with them.

A lot of people don't comply with our laws. That doesn't mean they aren't subject to them.

The thing is "subject to the juristiction of the United States" is the Important part. Because they are subject to their Country primarily.

if these people had visas their children would be citizens. no questions asked.

But they are subject to ours while they are here unless they have diplomatic immunity

Read what the Lawmakers who made that Law at the time wrote about the 14th Amendment. And there are other Rulings, for exmaple a native American born on American soil - he did not get Citizenship.

Let's just grant all of the Americas immunity to our laws. Then we can honestly say they are not in our jurisdiction

they have rejected our laws. their first act upon entering the country was to break the law.

that's insanity.

how about we just throw them and their spawn the fuck out.

So anyone who breaks a law is not under our juristiction anymore? So we can't prosecute anyone?

they aren't citizens, they aren't residents, they aren't visitors. they're criminals. eject them.

they have no legal status.

They are under our law unless we grant them immunity

no, they are under honduran law as they are honduran citizens, and have no legal status whatsoever here. eject them.

boot them across the border. they aren't our responsibility. we have no obligation to pay for them.

Then you're agreeing with me. We cannot legally prosecute a Honduran for murder?

Just send them home with our thanks?

i don't care to prosecute them. violent invaders should be shot.

So we should declare war on Honduras?

if you come here illegaly you arnt deserving of the same protections

you're taking a legalistic stance. i don't really give a fuck about that. i just want them out.

i don't really care how illegals are removed.

so long as they are removed.

```Then you're agreeing with me. We cannot legally prosecute a Honduran for murder?
Just send them home with our thanks?```
No, they don't have constitutional rights because they don't apply to the laws of the US of A!