@DrYuriMom There are already rulings about the 14th, wich was only done to allow Slaves to become US Citizens. That was the thought behind it. Now the Left Extremist and corporatists misuse and abuse it to get citizen rights to illegal Aliens. Tje Justicar did an interestint take.

so in short: How its done today is bullshit and was never intended to be that way

The Supreme Court rules in 1898 that the equivalent of today's illegal aliens, the Chinese, we're guaranteed birthright citizenship by the 14th. It goes back a LOT further than the current debate.

Again, anyone here is subject to US law except diplomats with immunity. That's the whole point of diplomatic immunity- to remove people from jurisdiction of the host country's laws.

Wrong

the Chinese was a Resident

Wong was a legal Resident of the United States, not an illegal alien

If you want to remove people from the 14th without another amendment you need to remove those people from our laws. Ie a treaty granting everyone from a country immunity from our laws.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHNp8MAaNBM

they're illegal. pretty sure they're already removed from our laws because they have not complied with them.

A lot of people don't comply with our laws. That doesn't mean they aren't subject to them.

The thing is "subject to the juristiction of the United States" is the Important part. Because they are subject to their Country primarily.

if these people had visas their children would be citizens. no questions asked.

But they are subject to ours while they are here unless they have diplomatic immunity

Read what the Lawmakers who made that Law at the time wrote about the 14th Amendment. And there are other Rulings, for exmaple a native American born on American soil - he did not get Citizenship.

Let's just grant all of the Americas immunity to our laws. Then we can honestly say they are not in our jurisdiction

they have rejected our laws. their first act upon entering the country was to break the law.

that's insanity.

how about we just throw them and their spawn the fuck out.

So anyone who breaks a law is not under our juristiction anymore? So we can't prosecute anyone?

they aren't citizens, they aren't residents, they aren't visitors. they're criminals. eject them.

they have no legal status.

They are under our law unless we grant them immunity

no, they are under honduran law as they are honduran citizens, and have no legal status whatsoever here. eject them.

boot them across the border. they aren't our responsibility. we have no obligation to pay for them.

Then you're agreeing with me. We cannot legally prosecute a Honduran for murder?

Just send them home with our thanks?

i don't care to prosecute them. violent invaders should be shot.

So we should declare war on Honduras?

if you come here illegaly you arnt deserving of the same protections

you're taking a legalistic stance. i don't really give a fuck about that. i just want them out.

i don't really care how illegals are removed.

so long as they are removed.

```Then you're agreeing with me. We cannot legally prosecute a Honduran for murder?
Just send them home with our thanks?```
No, they don't have constitutional rights because they don't apply to the laws of the US of A!

they are illegal. not citizens, not residents, not visitors. no legal status whatsoever. they should not be here. that they are here is due to litigious shit like what you're spouting right now. i do not care that honduras is shit. i do not care that they're coming to seek a better life. none of this matters. what matters is that they GTFO.

The law exists to protect us all. We must always be vigilant when we decide to disregard safeguards to abuse. The 14th was necessary specifically because of prior abuse.

yes and it would be wrong to take it from citizens

these people are not american citizens. they are not legal residents or visitors with valid visas. they shouldn't get any constitutional rights.

illegals arnt citizans

Okay. If laws are created to clearly state the illegals are outside our laws and the only recourse for any crime they commit is to deport them, then I will agree that is sound reasoning to say the 14th does not apply.

otherwise you end up in this retarded scenario where the ENTIRE PLANET has US constitutional rights because they might one day cross the border illegally. people in the fucking caravans in mexico are claiming that their constitutional rights are being violated.