! agree

!agree

can anyone think of a justifiable example of violating the harm principle.

The Harm Principle states that the *only* justification for interfering in another's liberty is to prevent harm to others.

its close to it but not quite the same thing

have a feeling i would get kicked out of school if i wrote that

bioethics is hard for a libertarian

its like polar ends of the spectrum

true to a degree

yup need to think up a counterpoint for it

ill probaly just wright that thee is no case in witch that its okay to violate it worst case its a single lost point

its a bioethics classs and we are focusing on autominity

yeah there is no example i can tink ive asked like 5 diffrent people for help

no one can think how to prove it wrong but my professer bs

he very well could be

would not susprise me

ill make it work we will debate it in class and prove it true

these are one point HW. he dosent even read them as far as i know just makes sure you wrote something. i can mention collectivism and how its still wrong

thank yall for the help ill be sure to make the best of it as i can

cough cough the Louisiana purchase is unconstutional

didnt say its a bad thing

therefor it is left to the individual states not the goverment

yes and the land should have ben purchased by individual states not the fed

you are not wrong but the goverment was behaving outside of its scope

not saying it was a bad deal

just unconstutional

since it is not expressly permited to the federal goverment the states reserve said right Amendment X
RIGHTS RESERVED TO STATES OR PEOPLE
Passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791. The first 10 amendments form the Bill of Rights

only a few classes and only the honors ones

Turns out its okay to violate the harm/nap if it's for your own good kms

Is the use of medical tools to enhance human beings morally troubling?
how the hell can you say anything other than no

like i have no clue how to make tis in to many pages

if you come here illegaly you arnt deserving of the same protections

yes and it would be wrong to take it from citizens

illegals arnt citizans

!rank

if you use subjet to the laws of a nation does that mean any one born at a us embassy deserves citizenship, or since international corporations are subject to us jurisdiction and those employees are subject to the company does that by extension grant them rights.

Did yall hear the second native American woman got elected to congress

And abortion is gone in alabama

Yeet

No warren is an actual native

All like. . 5%

And the crazy Cruz lady won

Can't wait to see her get fucked over by the democratic establishment

You can apply to college with that

Ban his ass again

He'll is real