Message from @DrYuriMom
Discord ID: 508685106391547908
rofl
But is that *really* what you want
how about no. how about we just build a fucking wall and put illegals on the other side of it.
Now THAT is perfectly legal
so riddle me this... why do we have immigration laws if immigrants aren't subject to them
either enforce them, or open the borders...
I'm not going to try and defend that. I have always maintained we should go after employers who hire those not legally able to work. But employers don't get punished, only the worker. If we actually held employers accountable with large fines or even the dissolution of their business for repeat offenders, we'd solve the problem almost instantly.
As long as there is a demand, they *will* be a supply
And as with the drug war, all trying to stem supply when there is a big demand will do is waste billions for little to show for it
I agree with that
the war on drugs is as useless as prohibition was
and statistics confirm it
Because trying to control supply when there is a big demand is nonsense
How about do like we have done with corporate fraud. Make every corporation identify a Chief Human Resource Officer and that person is responsible under criminal law for immigration law compliance. In other words, in addition to fines for the corporation, that person could go to jail for it.
and the hypocrisy of denigrating certain drugs, whilst protecting and elevating the pharmaceutical drug empire... most notably the slacklers and Purdue pharmaceuticals
I have an idea on how to get corporations to pay taxes, by executive order, corporations found stashing funds offshore, have 72 hours to bring it home and pay taxes on it, otherwise, all of their intellectual property becomes public domain and are no longer subject to enforcement and protection from the United States
That would require a law
how fast would apple pay their taxes?
The executive can't just do something without legal basis
The President is subject to the law
doesn't congress have to pass a new law to override an executive order?
And anyway, "stashing funds" isn't illegal, at least not always
No, the Executive needs to provide evidence any order has legal basis. That's why the White House has lawyers.
Just as the Congress needs to provide evidence in every law regarding the Constitutional basis for it. Because even the Congress is subject to the Constitution.
hiding your profits offshore to evade paying your proper share of taxes erodes our economy, especially when they enjoy so many benefits of doing business in the USA
The patriot act slipped through the cracks on that...
Obama couldn't. Only the Congress can repeal laws.
its renewed through 2019
While Obama could not repeal laws, unfortunately he was head of the branch of government which enforces them.
So he could have simply selectively enforce the laws he wants.
@DrYuriMom the US is one of a very few number of countries that requires taxation of income, not earned/generated in its jurisdiction. This is the reason that the US noes not participate in the multitude of double taxation treaties. US is one of a few countries trying to exert its law outside its jurisdiction. Right now the EU is trying to fo the same thing.
A classic example is the global reach of the US law Sarbanes-Oxley
Federal Tax Brackets < Consumption Tax
@Walsp @RyeNorth @Rabbi Shekels @DrYuriMom Anyone wanna talk about the co-opting of words by the humanities, The development of Far-left liberal ideals in academia, and the influence of Russia in Black lives matter. Come join me in chatroom 2 I will moderator it a bit.
Is the use of medical tools to enhance human beings morally troubling?
how the hell can you say anything other than no
like i have no clue how to make tis in to many pages
@DrYuriMom There are already rulings about the 14th, wich was only done to allow Slaves to become US Citizens. That was the thought behind it. Now the Left Extremist and corporatists misuse and abuse it to get citizen rights to illegal Aliens. Tje Justicar did an interestint take.
so in short: How its done today is bullshit and was never intended to be that way
The Supreme Court rules in 1898 that the equivalent of today's illegal aliens, the Chinese, we're guaranteed birthright citizenship by the 14th. It goes back a LOT further than the current debate.
Again, anyone here is subject to US law except diplomats with immunity. That's the whole point of diplomatic immunity- to remove people from jurisdiction of the host country's laws.