Message from @nekomata
Discord ID: 405127356353609748
yes
You want clicks
"OK guys, well... this gun is cool looking, and it's black, and it fires bullets, so.... it functions. I mean, I hate guns, but I can imagine someone liking this for it's.... power....?"
They still are loosing money last I heard
anyhoo, gotta fly, gonna play heroes of the storm with some friends, i'll be around later
Cya then
It just makes no sense for games journalists to not be gamers.
Well I can say they hate black guns
if they wanted money, they should've gotten loyal audiences instead of spit on anyone that doesn't follow the progressive narrative
Nobody pays for news anymore however
I pay Tim to do that
Just need to replace press conferences with Twitter AMAs
Then maybe there'd be a lot less bullshit
Beautiful B-roll shots today, Tim. Also, the Text overlays are great.
Why do I get the feeling that "What you're saying is" is going to become a longer standing meme?
Also, how long before someone claims that saying "What you're saying is" as a means to take a dig at the left is a form of hate speech?
All I know is 'what you're saying is' is usually followed up by a strawman of what you were actually saying, at least from my experiences with it.
Aye, but since Kathy Newman used it so extensively, I've noticed people starting to use it satirically, like Tim does in today's video
on a related note, I'm wondering if there's any way to persuade Kathy to watch Cassie Jaye's TED Talk - in it Cassie talks about how she used to do the same thing back when she was of a feminist mindset
And to get her to see her "The Red Pill" documentary.
I'm wondering if it could be a good way to prod people into listening to what they're actually being told rather than what they think they're being told
I still need to watch the Red Pill myself, so not sure if Cassie actually explains how she used to think when she started the project
She does. Admittedly, she does spend more time on the MRA's point of view more than feminists, but she does both justice pretty alright. There was one part in there, however, where I am not ashamed to admit that I cried.
Where they were talking about boko haram.
Boko Haram is the islamist group that is against girls being educated if I'm remembering right?
Yeah.
All you heard about them was that they stop girls from getting an education, and kidnapped them that one time, right?
What you don't hear about is what they do to the boys.
They light them on fire.
aye, they don't report that on the news
And that they were killing the boys for months, and often the reports would use terms such as "people" or "villagers", even though they were mostly men, but since there was *one* woman in the group, they used the term "people."
And that that they only got the attention they did from the world once the kidnapped those girls.
Killing men and boys for months, even years, in unimaginable ways such as lighting them on fire.
Yet when they kidnap some girls, the world freaked out.
"#BringBackOurGirls"
This was an important lesson for them, obviously. "Just stick to brutally killing men. Noone cares about the men."
"They light them on fire."
Oh.
This got dark, didn't it? lol
I mean, hey, the darker parts of Islamist groups need to be showcased. Not enough light is being shed on it, because people are afraid of offending Muslims. If only they'd get on board with Muslim reformation, and see the current religion as it truly is. So many people are a prisoner of that faith, afraid to speak out, or run from their oppressors. That and pile onto that the fact many people have only known Islam. So when you have the atrocities on one hand, and basically all you've ever known on another, things tend to become muddled. Whereas, in other peoples' cases, they've been on the outside, looking in, seeing the problems rising from Islamic extremism.
The media is, in a sense, making peoples' chances of escape from actual maniacs that much harder by refusing to attribute the radical Islamist tag on pretty much any act of terrorism. And then there's the reality of them straight-up ignoring some attacks. A lot of attacks, actually. I have to actually look up the terrorist attacks in Europe. You'd think something like that would be top news. People are dying, and yet still, so many are willing to turn a blind eye. The literally only thing that they are accomplishing is further entrenching good people within their own prison. The prison that they, in the majority of cases, were born into.
And it's giving really shitty people free reign. It somewhat reminds me of the recruitment process of _actual_ white nationalists. Not this _blanket statement_ made up by many left-leaning individuals, who use it to discredit and defame their ideological and opinionated opponents. Basically, stories have been going around where (actual) white nationalists and skinheads have been recruiting kids and others at a young age who have been discarded by society. And what becomes of this is a sort of _"what if" situation. What _if_ these kids hadn't been manipulated and warped into someone else's twisted image at such a young age? Would they have been good people if they hadn't been thrown away so easily?
That's why I'm for Islamic reformation. _Technically,_ it makes little to no sense in one regard. Faith is about believing in something blindly, not changing what you have faith in. So it's kind of stupid on that front. Otherwise, why did you ever have faith to begin with if you were just going to change it? But on another more important side of things, Islam isn't going to go away. So the best chance the world has to step in the right direction is Islamic reformation, where the Qu'ran is revisted and revised to better fit a more peaceful and less barbaric way of life.
>wall of text
>rambling
Oh. My bad.
Let’s just say if Islam is the religion of peace than I really don’t want to know what the religion of war is.
^
^