Oh, yeah... How they are all too similar when it comes to writing

Indies don't need games journalists, because they demand money for actual coverage unless they "want" to cover it, which means the game needs publicity beforehand, which if it got pre-existant publicity would mean it doesnn't need the journalists spreading it

Well, that actually makes sense.

Also, helps that I find most of my games through steam reccomendations

And well.. User reviews

yes

steam is a better marketing tool now anyway

cuz the actual gamers that buy stuff have spat out any journalism cuz of gamergate

so all games journalists will generate nowadays on games tehy cover is hate from a mob of people taht arent even customers

Hmm, I guess they are benefiting from the hate.

Makes more sense that way.

well it depends

if it the journalists only cover the game its bad

if they go "look at this hated game" people will respond by buying it out of protest

Well, makes sense with clickbait actually

yes

You want clicks

"OK guys, well... this gun is cool looking, and it's black, and it fires bullets, so.... it functions. I mean, I hate guns, but I can imagine someone liking this for it's.... power....?"

They still are loosing money last I heard

anyhoo, gotta fly, gonna play heroes of the storm with some friends, i'll be around later

Cya then

It just makes no sense for games journalists to not be gamers.

Well I can say they hate black guns

if they wanted money, they should've gotten loyal audiences instead of spit on anyone that doesn't follow the progressive narrative

Nobody pays for news anymore however

I pay Tim to do that

Just need to replace press conferences with Twitter AMAs

Then maybe there'd be a lot less bullshit

Beautiful B-roll shots today, Tim. Also, the Text overlays are great.

Why do I get the feeling that "What you're saying is" is going to become a longer standing meme?

Also, how long before someone claims that saying "What you're saying is" as a means to take a dig at the left is a form of hate speech?

All I know is 'what you're saying is' is usually followed up by a strawman of what you were actually saying, at least from my experiences with it.

Aye, but since Kathy Newman used it so extensively, I've noticed people starting to use it satirically, like Tim does in today's video

on a related note, I'm wondering if there's any way to persuade Kathy to watch Cassie Jaye's TED Talk - in it Cassie talks about how she used to do the same thing back when she was of a feminist mindset

And to get her to see her "The Red Pill" documentary.

I'm wondering if it could be a good way to prod people into listening to what they're actually being told rather than what they think they're being told

I still need to watch the Red Pill myself, so not sure if Cassie actually explains how she used to think when she started the project

She does. Admittedly, she does spend more time on the MRA's point of view more than feminists, but she does both justice pretty alright. There was one part in there, however, where I am not ashamed to admit that I cried.

Where they were talking about boko haram.

Boko Haram is the islamist group that is against girls being educated if I'm remembering right?

Yeah.

All you heard about them was that they stop girls from getting an education, and kidnapped them that one time, right?