Message from @LotheronPrime
Discord ID: 409844910393655306
This needs to be a shirt now, the three beanies of the beanforce.
Btw @Good tagging is not enabled. Well the everyone tag.
Ever wonder why these guys only appear in groups? Give them the stage, well just one person, not the whole group, and then they will shrink back.
Its either them not having enough experience with speaking in general, or loosing confidence due to being alone, or knowing how they will make the movement as a whole look silly.
Thank you kind of figured that out when I didn't highlight yellow just didn't care enough to change it back
Nah man, just be aware why that was the case.
Alot of people spamming links, we aint here to read news, we all already do that. Give something we cant already get from the news, some calm nice discussion.
Just some advice about the subreddits singled out; if you want to know more about KIA then contact either the hatman or netscape. Both individuals know a lot; Hatman was an admin for that subreddit.
Whoa what
did they purge KIA?
oj, no
they were called out as problematic and I'm just saying KIA is the kind of community that would love to offer up their perspective on it. The hatman is really my top suggestion for any kind of follow-up; he is no longer on the admin team, but he was their early enough and long enough to be able to offer historical context as to how the subreddit operates.
Tim Pool with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying discussing Evergreen
"protect your money in the event of economic stability" 🤔
stability or instability?
gj tim
although, I skipped that part
habit
he literally said stability
nervousness? doing an ad while in someone elses home before an interview?
Keynesian economics
Save, save, save during economic boom, spend, spend, spend during economic bust.
I think this was already discussed somewhere but. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/25/ai-face-swap-pornography-emma-watson-scarlett-johansson-taylor-swift-daisy-ridley-sophie-turner-maisie-williams
I'll go full tinfoil: Imagine. You've been to the amazon store, and because of all the cameras there they now have a perfect image of you: how you walk, what you buy, what you usually wear, how long you usually stay there, how you behave, and your face from every angle imaginable. But you said something that upset a corrupted institution, and now they are out after your blood. A week later, the police comes to detain you, they have video proof you killed someone in another state, where you looked into the camera and how you behaved there etc. It's definitely you, even if you didn't do it. All because of this algoritm.
As far as I know, the algoritm is self-learning, and I've seen the first versions of the porn subreddit related to porn from this algoritm and the latest ones - the latest ones are almost perfect. I'm definitely sure someone will use this AI to frame someone in a bad way - whether it would be a government or a jealous ex who would send your SO a fake clip of you having intercourse with them - this will end so badly.
Oh please, that's just the start.
yes i brought this up in the technology channel, its a small scroll up right now there,
but it ended with people talking about self driving quantum computers :P
and yes me and grenade discussed this, this tech will make video evidence unreliable
You can't trust anything being said about politicians now
'see, here's a vid of them saying they hate white/black people!'
to be fair, you can't trust politicians ever, even if they're in the flesh saying what they're saying, i.e. modern democrats
Read again.
i know what you meant, i was refering to the fact that a politician generally will say whatever people wanna hear, and that they in general hate/don't care about anyone else
it was a joke 😦
but back on the subject, this tech will make video footage unreliable as evidence, and until the world realises this tech is already here, fake news is gonna boom soon
@Rain deepfake is not the end all solution for faking something, i've been over this
it's more of a step back if you are looking for perfect replication
it is currently not even close to being on the level that you get it accepted as evidence in court
too high quality and it's blatantly fake
too low quality and it's not good enough to prove a murder
you can prove if a photo was photoshopped 99% of the time... and you only have to prove that for a single frame of a faked video...
you two are right,
But these days next to a court of law
you can also get a bad conviction in the court of public opinion, which in certain careers is a death sentence, just look at metoo, or other such tainted witch-hunt events, that coolest monkey in the jungle incident at H&M
court of public pinion... watch orville episode 7... we are getting there...