Whoa what

did they purge KIA?

oj, no

they were called out as problematic and I'm just saying KIA is the kind of community that would love to offer up their perspective on it. The hatman is really my top suggestion for any kind of follow-up; he is no longer on the admin team, but he was their early enough and long enough to be able to offer historical context as to how the subreddit operates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzChkzNDmuc

Tim Pool with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying discussing Evergreen

"protect your money in the event of economic stability" 🤔

stability or instability?

gj tim

although, I skipped that part

habit

but I'm also a patron so meh

he literally said stability

nervousness? doing an ad while in someone elses home before an interview?

Keynesian economics

Save, save, save during economic boom, spend, spend, spend during economic bust.

I think this was already discussed somewhere but. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/25/ai-face-swap-pornography-emma-watson-scarlett-johansson-taylor-swift-daisy-ridley-sophie-turner-maisie-williams

I'll go full tinfoil: Imagine. You've been to the amazon store, and because of all the cameras there they now have a perfect image of you: how you walk, what you buy, what you usually wear, how long you usually stay there, how you behave, and your face from every angle imaginable. But you said something that upset a corrupted institution, and now they are out after your blood. A week later, the police comes to detain you, they have video proof you killed someone in another state, where you looked into the camera and how you behaved there etc. It's definitely you, even if you didn't do it. All because of this algoritm.

As far as I know, the algoritm is self-learning, and I've seen the first versions of the porn subreddit related to porn from this algoritm and the latest ones - the latest ones are almost perfect. I'm definitely sure someone will use this AI to frame someone in a bad way - whether it would be a government or a jealous ex who would send your SO a fake clip of you having intercourse with them - this will end so badly.

Oh please, that's just the start.

yes i brought this up in the technology channel, its a small scroll up right now there,

but it ended with people talking about self driving quantum computers :P

and yes me and grenade discussed this, this tech will make video evidence unreliable

You can't trust anything being said about politicians now

'see, here's a vid of them saying they hate white/black people!'

to be fair, you can't trust politicians ever, even if they're in the flesh saying what they're saying, i.e. modern democrats

Read again.

i know what you meant, i was refering to the fact that a politician generally will say whatever people wanna hear, and that they in general hate/don't care about anyone else

it was a joke 😦

but back on the subject, this tech will make video footage unreliable as evidence, and until the world realises this tech is already here, fake news is gonna boom soon

@Rain deepfake is not the end all solution for faking something, i've been over this

it's more of a step back if you are looking for perfect replication

it is currently not even close to being on the level that you get it accepted as evidence in court

too high quality and it's blatantly fake
too low quality and it's not good enough to prove a murder

you can prove if a photo was photoshopped 99% of the time... and you only have to prove that for a single frame of a faked video...

you two are right,

But these days next to a court of law

you can also get a bad conviction in the court of public opinion, which in certain careers is a death sentence, just look at metoo, or other such tainted witch-hunt events, that coolest monkey in the jungle incident at H&M

court of public pinion... watch orville episode 7... we are getting there...

"bad conviction in the court of public opinion" 🤔

oh no

the people that autistically screech with completely unfounded opinions

i wish i could agree they're just harmless screechers,

but people have gotten their reputation damaged, got fired and such over just allegations, imagine if theres even a "video proof" claim

i mean this shit has been going on since humans existed

the difference is that in the past you could ask if they have evidence, and they have none, and some will actually then realise it might not be real

with this it'll simply guarantee gullible people will buy whatever you serve them,

and with CNN peddling stories like Two scoops of ice cream, fake forged videos won't be off their realm of narrative telling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk

They already can fake video.

Well to an extent.