Message from @Aetius

Discord ID: 429991188788019200


2018-04-01 11:35:27 UTC  

As if Trump himself would have to come and clean up the room himself.

2018-04-01 11:35:36 UTC  

well they cleaned it themselves

2018-04-01 11:35:51 UTC  

***WHAT WAS THE POINT THEN.***

2018-04-01 11:36:01 UTC  

I can't even English right now.

2018-04-01 11:36:10 UTC  

i dunno, i'm not sure who played who in that

2018-04-01 11:36:30 UTC  

Trump derangement syndrome actually netting his business profit

2018-04-01 11:37:20 UTC  

or well, profit.. it might drop, i for one wouldn't wanna sleep in a room that contained live rats for a few months/years, and since they prolly wont announce which room, i wouldn't go there

2018-04-01 11:38:24 UTC  

still, i'm not sure if handing 1600 dollar is a good way to "get at him"

2018-04-01 11:38:32 UTC  

I prefer to use 'trump induced derangement syndrome' because that allows the acronym of 'TIDeS' as in, Tide Pods

2018-04-01 11:38:41 UTC  

Worst case scenario is that he orders all of the rooms to be given a deep clean.
Cleaning that other people, all with low-paying jobs, will have to do.
Again, do they think Trump himself would come down to clean those rooms? lol

2018-04-01 11:39:33 UTC  

its prolly just a publicity stunt

2018-04-01 11:39:56 UTC  

It is, but it's a stunt that resulted in handing 1,600 dollars to the business.

2018-04-01 11:40:09 UTC  

So, congratulations, you guys played yourselves.

2018-04-01 11:40:15 UTC  

considering they literally have a picture that says "Rats will eat anything, even their rat king"

meaning they're calling trump supporters Rats (as opposed to only 50% which would be deplorable)

2018-04-01 11:41:11 UTC  

but yes, this is playing yourself 101

2018-04-01 11:43:00 UTC  

and the article isnt april 1st published, so not a joke? 😛

2018-04-01 11:49:19 UTC  

Hopefully they get sued for a lot of money.

2018-04-01 11:51:53 UTC  

if they're willing to dole out 1600 dollars for a bad piece of cliché performance art, they won't care much about money

2018-04-01 11:52:25 UTC  

i mean look at them in "criminal" suits with balaclavas, these are LARPers

2018-04-01 12:54:15 UTC  

Narrator: The resistance is entirely larpers

2018-04-01 13:11:28 UTC  

Larpers who are great grifters

2018-04-01 13:24:52 UTC  

Some of these “performance” artists are using OPM (other people’s money), either government grants or money they conned rich libs out of. It’s easier to larp like that with OPM.

2018-04-01 17:40:04 UTC  

Holy shit guys

2018-04-01 17:40:12 UTC  

Boogie2988 died last night

2018-04-01 18:10:35 UTC  

**@someone** (⁄ ⁄•⁄ω⁄•⁄ ⁄) ***(Viva)***

2018-04-01 22:37:33 UTC  

Tell me about Boogie’s death tomorrow and maybe I’ll believe you

2018-04-02 00:40:42 UTC  

Fair enough

2018-04-02 00:54:30 UTC  

Do you have a source for this?

2018-04-02 09:02:04 UTC  

He is pretty active on twitter for a dead guy 😏

2018-04-02 14:12:18 UTC  

Question: Could it be possible/feasible for journalists/news outlets to start watermarking recordings with the date of recording, of events. I am sick of 10 year old footage being used as current events ..

2018-04-02 14:28:17 UTC  

possible? yes, easy

Will they though?
Not a chance, these people would sell newborn babies to pedophiles if they could get away with reporting on it

2018-04-02 14:46:26 UTC  

@Acenan it could still be digitally removed or altered

2018-04-02 14:57:13 UTC  

Yes, it would make it more difficult to do misuse footage. But i see as technology gets even better it will be easier to change/remove..

2018-04-02 15:11:52 UTC  

we discussed a while ago is there a way you can bake in something into these files which cannot be edited, not without a lot of effort, so you can figure out if something was editted with like photoshop

2018-04-02 15:12:39 UTC  

perhaps using something like a block-chain will do it. Rather than try to harden the source, get security through redundancy.

2018-04-02 15:13:32 UTC  

if 100 people have the file and it says it was made on like 1/1/2018. and someone tries to say "no, it was made 1/1/2017" despite those 100 people have copies from the original file, everyone can say "no, you are wrong or a liar"

2018-04-02 17:05:43 UTC  

Well, there's hashing, natch.

2018-04-02 17:06:05 UTC  

Perchance a hashing algorithm that also uses the last date of modification or something?

2018-04-02 19:23:36 UTC  
2018-04-02 19:24:05 UTC  

you can already use existing blockchain technologies to sign images for basically free

2018-04-02 19:24:31 UTC  

but that's not going to mitigate photoshop