Message from @n-
Discord ID: 443895763810910249
personally I think human intelligence is like physical ability. everyone has varying capability, different races have different capabilities on average, some have it in good quality some don't, etc.
both your thumbs are different in finger print too
but who knows for sure until you start looking into it
even though they follow the same genetic code
Wouldn't surprise me one bit if intelligence is bred into/out of family trees.
the best thing to say without a clear method is "I don't know"
Shit is going down between Israel and Syria https://twitter.com/QalaatAlMudiq/status/994333803048062978
you could predict a finger print when it comes to whorls and ridges, based off of the genetic information
not in detail though
that is enviroment
even with a clear method you can't say, its the scientific method,
You make an assumption (hypothesis)
Test it, and see what comes out
If it correlates with what you expected, and happens every time, you have scientific evidence
I think it's difficult to even tell what environmental factors are important towards that. I remember reading that whether or not a baby is breastfed by their biological mother can have an effect on their IQ, and that this difference is noticeable even if any certain child received breast milk from someone other than their mother
man everything can effect iq
age of the mom
amount of hammers to the face
siblings, quantity and age difference
kindergarden
the idea is that genes provide a maximum, and then enviroment diminished it a lil or a lot
but those are individual values
if you however take a sample of 1000 people, and take the average of their IQ scores, you get an average to work with, and can then set categories
you do it by taking larger samples, so you try to eliminate most outlying variables
for example, if I remember right, one of the important qualities of an IQ test is how fast you complete it
depends on the test
could be
there are people who test, who are good at taking tests or who just have that knowledge, like for example if you don't know something just skip it immediately go to the next thing, don't spend 5 years on it
Speed, Answers correct, and the age of the person
myself for example, I'll finish it until I have an answer and I might even check over it if I was unsure
but doing that would make for a lower score, ie. it's more intelligent to just skip it, come back later, then give your best guess rather than trying to figure it out then and there
if you're just there taking a test though, are you really thinking about how to absolutely crush this test into the dirt?
that's just that one aspect. there's other elements, too (which I think have their own ways of being handled). ex. those people who freeze when it comes to taking tests
the data shows that the more intelligent you are the more likely it is you will crush a test
pretty much every competence related task is "g loaded"
which means higher in general intelligence people complete it better/faster
general intelligence is measured with an IQ test
thats why its an intelligence quoefficient
also I wonder things like the level of their general intelligence vs being motivated, or working with things they're intimately familiar with
yes, but this is why you have to take large samples
if 1/10 people are affected by it, then you can still say with 90% confidence the rest aren't
well, I didn't mean that in terms of how it affects general IQ, but rather.. if you accounted for those elements as if they were a separate IQ, what would the differences between those two scores be
per individual, massive