by taking their names and searching through foregin registries for people with similar names

then filing the report as undeclared foregin property

what the fuck

I reported it already, everybody else here should do it

Is it doxing if they put out everything on LinkedIn themselves?

DId they give you their linkedn profiles?

It’s public, so yes.

Why is it that there hasn't been as much left-wing street violence lately? It's pretty clear that the underlying rage and self-righteousness hasn't gone away. Why aren't they smashing and burning as much as they used to?

Winter?

Hot as fuck in Cali where most of the leftists are. So probably not because winter. Also it’s spring there almost summer (I think).

There are apparently protests scheduled for the 30th. There will probably be some random assaults and smashed franchise storefronts, but without an organized opposition group there probably won't be any street battles.

I wonder if we'll see another targeted attack like the Scalise shooting before long. There's so much irrational apoplectic rage right now on the left.

I wonder if there are more or less raging leftists since the election. Almost want to say less.

Well, there's always the same number of useful idiots. Dumbass college kids who took their first liberal arts course and think they understand the world. Not much change in the celebrity sphere; they still virtue signal with basically the same frequency. Other than Kanye there haven't been any changes there.

And there's no good way to gauge the number and efficacy of mid-level leadership, as they obviously try to keep a low profile. Like the 'community organizer' types.

Herdsmen for the slogan chanters and sign wavers.

It's really hard to get a feel for this stuff because of the bubble effect. I am definitely in a bubble.

I wanna revive Kekistan. It's an amazing weapon against identity politics

Sargon's initial plan was to get it registered as an ethnicity

So I've watch a great number of videos discussing this "EUR-Lex - 52016PC0593" article 13.
But they all just read from news-sites and not from the article itself.
So I looked it up at <https://eur-lex.europa.eu>.
I may just not understand lawyer words, but it seriously doesn't seems so bad at many say it is.
From I understand it's saying sites should have some sort of feature that allows copyright holders to flag/notice the site of copyrighted material...

What's throwing me off is the "**such as** appropriate and proportionate content recognition technologies" in part 3.
So it doesn't mean it HAS TO be like YouTube's ContentID system, right?

I suggest reading up on the copyright algorithm that is supposed to be used for the implementation of Article 13

Do you know where I can find that?

@XDRosenheim imagine article 13 has passed, and i'm tying to start up a new chat service or search engine and it allows for links. Now i'm going to start operating in the EU. I have no way of knowing a website has invoked its copyright holder rights. If i allow someone to post that link, i'm in serious trouble. So the logical choice is to block all EU based links until they get added to a list i have of places who have given me permission. So i don't have links in the EU, at least not a first. Now lets each individual link from a site has the potential to be flagged as copyright because each link is a different story so maybe one the copyright holder wants money for and the other they don't. Now i need to ask for permission FOR EVERY LINK. Why would i bother enabling links at that point when they won't show up for possibly days or weeks if at all or cost me lots of money?

what happens if a link is posted and i don't get notified its copy right status was no good or perhaps even changed?

also, did you read article 11? because it is also related if i remember

The open letter here sums it up pretty well https://savecodeshare.eu

"Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users shall, in cooperation with rightholders, take measures to ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rightholders for the use of their works or other subject-matter or to prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by rightholders through the cooperation with the service providers. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. The service providers shall provide rightholders with adequate information on the functioning and the deployment of the measures, as well as, when relevant, adequate reporting on the recognition and use of the works and other subject-matter."

That is paragraph 1 of article 13. That sounds like youtubes copyright systems.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/20/politics/charlottesville-washington-white-nationalist-rally/index.html

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3k4wk3/valve-disables-item-trading-for-dutch-counter-strike-players-making-their-expensive-gun-skins-worthless

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2018/06/21/een-leeuw-ontsnapt-in-planckendael-hulpdiensten-ter-plaatse-be/

lion escapes zoo, gets shot
this is harrambe all over again
nyannyanbe

i think the family separation thing is a "big ask"

trump changes policy to prosecute all illegal entrants

they go to jail, kids go to holding facility

now trump walks it back

and everyone is guna go wooo we did it

then ignore the actual enforcement on the border

wasnt it going on for over 16yrs? ... and he ended it?

ask for something really big, then walk it back acting as though youve conceded ground