!agree

@HungBunny 'Is it true that most indigenous people's around the world have red yellow and black as their colours?' that is not the case that i'm aware of, red yes, black maybe (charcoal and embers of ash) yellow? sure. however prior to the colonization of the americas (or possibly before) the mayans had blues, greens, and oranges due to abundant flowers and different kinds of bugs that secreted specific pigments when squished or ground up with various other items.

not to mention that the colors of many native american tribes in the united states regions having various colors that they used for different things

so did many cultures worldwide, as far as we know 5-6 of the seven continents have advanced structures upon them, i'm unaware of australia specifically tbh, so can't comment there

true, however if you'll permit me to speak slightly in context but in another case it may clarify some points

1. europe and asia(including india for the most part) developed significantly faster technologically than all other locations in the world.

2. it stands to reason that the majority of other locations would be just as far along evolutionarily (technology wise) than another culture as well

it's potentially possible that (lets face it) australia has many of the worlds most deadly creatures, a lot of the leaders in innovation may have died long before they had a chance to blossom into the minds needed to advance culturally

but there's plenty of other factors involved as well, my presumption is but one of many

i wouldn't dream of putting that opinion upon you, i'm just making the assertion that it could be environmental and no fault of their own.

well there's many factors as well there, the majority of europeans are eurasian by nature, which may have had the 'special sauce' for the culture to advance as quickly and as far as it did

india and asia as a whole have some of the worlds longest standing civilizations under their belts after all

when you aren't starving and working on the next meal you have time to find other pursuits

if true nep, that's incredibly unfortunate

in some regions the first painting was with chalk or ash specifically, whatever was most available, ground up then blown across their hand to make certain images or using their fingers to draw types of animals

some are FAR more advanced than their counterparts however and can be even seen as more modern

i think there were also painted stones in australia.. but i could be wrong

and could have been hoaxed, only heard it once in a documentary and never again

it does, and it also looks like a lot lifted assets from other games

specifically the guns look like CS:Source

or 1.6

.... err 1.3? it's been ages since i touched the original cs game

...

seems like a glorified troll to be honest

/pol and 4chan at it again

wouldn't be 'extremely' difficult to mod counterstrike, post it to steam with a false acct and then inform media tbh

@Ϻ14ᛟ that doesn't even look the same game they posted.. hmmm

oh sorry

i missed that bit, was tabbed out and came back that i thought it was that game where you could mass shooter a school and be taken out by cops

...

i'm laughing internally about those people

bulshittery needs more updates

arma was a good 100 dollar expendature

till i realized my system was too old to run it well

reposting

you know that moment you buy a nice car, but then realize it's shocks are absolute crap on gravel and you work on a farm
then around month 3 you realize they didn't properly pad the seats.. yep that's my buyers remorse on arma 3 early. had to buy a crapload of hardware to run it(edited)

i found out they throttled my processor on my old rig by a lot

so new motherboard later.. XD and arma 4 is gonna have the same issues arma 3 had when it launched

well duh, if you're a nazi you're a second class citizen, much like the (fill in the blank)

that was the bit where you said kekistani people

how about better at-launch optimization?

dunno if you saw arma 3 day one, but franky had a 3k cash pc and even he was getting 30 frames top end

absolutely, it eats up resources like a starving ethiopian afraid that their father will eat that rice grain he found on his foot first

when half the optimizations done to your game was due to open source modders and coders, you know the dev team didn't put much work in XD

well then...

surprised this got out if it's in china tbh, weibo and the other social media typically catch it before it gets out

ah should have spotted that.. it's early in the morning.. is what i'd like to say for that terrible realization. also interesting

also i may be overly critical here, but did anyone else see the concrete powder between the officers and the grounded gun wielder?

bad trigger discipline methinks

you drew carl wrong

he never wears a suit

it's really well done in all honesty, i can see the erased right eye but otherwise that's what happens with pencil shading

hmm, it may have actually been the two officers who fell there. they may have been mortally injured

hard to say since the video is 32 seconds

one needed a hand up, while the other tried to get up but failed at the tail end. well to be fair, the true answer when fired upon to end a threat is 'as many as needed till the enemy stops moving'

can't tell from distance, but one droppe pretty fast while the other looks like lost footing

yes one of the officers who fell looked hit

both were really close to one another so hard to see for sure though

well if the cops didn't die, they certainly are feeling it

getting hit by a gun even with kevlar sucks ass

i wonder if those 'common sense' gun reforming narratives in the united states will become a platform in the UK for free speech reform

might not have articulated it well, but i think it'd make a good counter argument or at least funny to note for half a moment

'britain needs comprehensive common sense free speech reform, these damned righties need to stop with their weaponized vocabularies, it's literally killing people'

also thanks cetronius

i will still say: thanks for the welcome

technically the head would be the slave to the head between the legs so which is the server and which is the merry maker?

a man's own philosophical dillema right there

hmm.

so tell me if my argument is invalid here, as i do not believe my arguments were inaccurate or inarticulate.

also if this question is in the wrong place i can move it

firstly, i got into a bit of a debate with a person who claims that (after some reasonable debate) count dankulas case should not be given the same considerations as the trial tommy robinson was attempting to cover. it was my consideration that as a matter of principle, both cases should have been givven the very same considerations one way or the other universally. however they believe i am wrong. what say you well reasoned and not entirely trollish group of pepe's? (post above is reply to this one)

and i agree. i see it more as a matter of principle that one way or the other both cases (and to be more general, ALL cases) should be afforded the same fundamental protections by law to prevent undue influence, or none at all should. there should be no in-between

true, however they had one person judging the case

and one is just as easily influenced as 12 or however many jurors there are in a british trial

i am mostly a centrist by nature, so i have conflicting views on most subjects, however in this case, the principled path would be to choose an 'either, or' option. either both have media blackouts regarding the trial, or they do not

any partiality just shows the inequal method by which people are tried

-shrugs- i know i've got him on the ropes as he's intentionally ignoring the 'or' side of my point

either way i've given him enough of my brain power for the day, moving on

i'm aware of that dko

it's one of my arguments that either they should have the same media coverage, or not have any media coverage

as it skews one way or another with or without them

to make the argument more concise i made the point that 'you cannot eliminate all biases in all counts, but you can eliminate the inequity of one trial having more protections than another by affording them the same protections period, it's only a matter of how you might decide which version of protections you use. by making invisible trials from the public, or by making all trials visible to the public

nazibot isn't right. needs to be a chainsaw attached to an ar-15

oh, i can't actually link it directly, i'll PM then

must be pepe eh?

well i'm not one to bend the knee for false idols of kek

kek was a great prophet, but not the sun.. son? of kek

mmh, if he didn't want punishment sure

but if he wanted proper justice for the children used and abused by grooming gangs, getting public outrage in a ferver is the way to ensure the trial is squeezed for the correct decisions

the issue with it is mob mentality can often cause pressure for a false guilty verdict

lol

mmh, if a cop tells you to not go into a burning building to save your baby, do you obey the lawful order, or you go in and get the baby?

he broke his parole,

as far as i'm aware that's what happened

no, tommy did

dankula did not break the law. he committed a social justice crime

no.

it didn't exist prior to dankula being convicted of such crime

the way the british criminal justice system works, via laymans explanation to me, is that british law is determined by precedent, i.e. if there is no prior law regarding a specific crime, it is taken before a court and determined whether or not a crime has indeed occured, and then if it has, it is then judged and precedent is made by which all such crimes in the future will be pursued and treated

in otherwords, if dankula had gone to jail, then all others commiting grossly offensive comedy would by then be criminalized and put in jail