Message from @Sin
Discord ID: 451100150689955840
but white males are not
basic truths
collusion
Count Dankula is not guilty and Tommy is not guilty
If tommy knew about the gag order, he shouldn't have done it
It's this simple
mmh, if he didn't want punishment sure
but if he wanted proper justice for the children used and abused by grooming gangs, getting public outrage in a ferver is the way to ensure the trial is squeezed for the correct decisions
the issue with it is mob mentality can often cause pressure for a false guilty verdict
A lynching mob would have been justice?
lol
@Sin
Yeah, but that's not a reason to "break" the law
He should have waited until the thing was over
mmh, if a cop tells you to not go into a burning building to save your baby, do you obey the lawful order, or you go in and get the baby?
HE didn't break the law. That's the problem
There is a law in place for the judge to do just that.
So... he did break the law, yes.
he broke his parole,
as far as i'm aware that's what happened
Count dankula broke the law?
Both did, actually.
Dankula's is an unjust law.
No because he didn't enter the court, and repeated what was public
dankula did not break the law. he committed a social justice crime
no parole breached
The law exists to criminalize being grossly offensive, yes?
no.
If you're going to claim the law doesn't exist, then there's nothing that needs fixing.
Last time he went onto court property
it didn't exist prior to dankula being convicted of such crime
This time he only repeated the allegations
Did they make the law up on the spot?
They use whatever law they can get away with
You two aren't even making sense. Also, this silly argument isn't <#377519739380957184> material.
Deck of cards they play whatever they think they can
the way the british criminal justice system works, via laymans explanation to me, is that british law is determined by precedent, i.e. if there is no prior law regarding a specific crime, it is taken before a court and determined whether or not a crime has indeed occured, and then if it has, it is then judged and precedent is made by which all such crimes in the future will be pursued and treated
What occured is utter nonsense. Politically motivated as Tommy is getting bigger, day of freedom must really pissed them off.
in otherwords, if dankula had gone to jail, then all others commiting grossly offensive comedy would by then be criminalized and put in jail
I thought we were agreeing ๐
dankula was the pillar that fell down in terms of precedent, and now it's fineable for saying something racist