Message from @Sin

Discord ID: 451100109120339971


2018-05-29 19:01:04 UTC  

Yes because they are muslims

2018-05-29 19:01:10 UTC  

muslim are protected

2018-05-29 19:01:15 UTC  

but white males are not

2018-05-29 19:01:18 UTC  

basic truths

2018-05-29 19:01:21 UTC  

collusion

2018-05-29 19:02:43 UTC  

Count Dankula is not guilty and Tommy is not guilty

2018-05-29 19:04:24 UTC  

If tommy knew about the gag order, he shouldn't have done it

2018-05-29 19:04:31 UTC  

It's this simple

2018-05-29 19:07:26 UTC  

mmh, if he didn't want punishment sure

2018-05-29 19:08:10 UTC  

but if he wanted proper justice for the children used and abused by grooming gangs, getting public outrage in a ferver is the way to ensure the trial is squeezed for the correct decisions

2018-05-29 19:08:38 UTC  

the issue with it is mob mentality can often cause pressure for a false guilty verdict

2018-05-29 19:08:42 UTC  

A lynching mob would have been justice?

2018-05-29 19:08:55 UTC  

lol

2018-05-29 19:08:57 UTC  

@Sin
Yeah, but that's not a reason to "break" the law

2018-05-29 19:09:15 UTC  

He should have waited until the thing was over

2018-05-29 19:09:50 UTC  

mmh, if a cop tells you to not go into a burning building to save your baby, do you obey the lawful order, or you go in and get the baby?

2018-05-29 19:09:54 UTC  

HE didn't break the law. That's the problem

2018-05-29 19:10:14 UTC  

There is a law in place for the judge to do just that.

2018-05-29 19:10:28 UTC  

So... he did break the law, yes.

2018-05-29 19:10:39 UTC  

he broke his parole,

2018-05-29 19:10:47 UTC  

as far as i'm aware that's what happened

2018-05-29 19:10:50 UTC  

Count dankula broke the law?

2018-05-29 19:10:56 UTC  

no, tommy did

2018-05-29 19:11:03 UTC  

Both did, actually.

2018-05-29 19:11:15 UTC  

Dankula's is an unjust law.

2018-05-29 19:11:16 UTC  

No because he didn't enter the court, and repeated what was public

2018-05-29 19:11:22 UTC  

dankula did not break the law. he committed a social justice crime

2018-05-29 19:11:23 UTC  

no parole breached

2018-05-29 19:11:38 UTC  

The law exists to criminalize being grossly offensive, yes?

2018-05-29 19:11:44 UTC  

no.

2018-05-29 19:11:50 UTC  

If you're going to claim the law doesn't exist, then there's nothing that needs fixing.

2018-05-29 19:11:57 UTC  

Last time he went onto court property

2018-05-29 19:12:03 UTC  

it didn't exist prior to dankula being convicted of such crime

2018-05-29 19:12:06 UTC  

This time he only repeated the allegations

2018-05-29 19:12:16 UTC  

Did they make the law up on the spot?

2018-05-29 19:12:37 UTC  

They use whatever law they can get away with

2018-05-29 19:12:41 UTC  

You two aren't even making sense. Also, this silly argument isn't <#377519739380957184> material.

2018-05-29 19:12:51 UTC  

Deck of cards they play whatever they think they can

2018-05-29 19:13:37 UTC  

the way the british criminal justice system works, via laymans explanation to me, is that british law is determined by precedent, i.e. if there is no prior law regarding a specific crime, it is taken before a court and determined whether or not a crime has indeed occured, and then if it has, it is then judged and precedent is made by which all such crimes in the future will be pursued and treated

2018-05-29 19:13:46 UTC  

What occured is utter nonsense. Politically motivated as Tommy is getting bigger, day of freedom must really pissed them off.

2018-05-29 19:14:36 UTC  

in otherwords, if dankula had gone to jail, then all others commiting grossly offensive comedy would by then be criminalized and put in jail