lol

@Sin
Yeah, but that's not a reason to "break" the law

He should have waited until the thing was over

mmh, if a cop tells you to not go into a burning building to save your baby, do you obey the lawful order, or you go in and get the baby?

HE didn't break the law. That's the problem

There is a law in place for the judge to do just that.

So... he did break the law, yes.

he broke his parole,

as far as i'm aware that's what happened

Count dankula broke the law?

no, tommy did

Both did, actually.

Dankula's is an unjust law.

No because he didn't enter the court, and repeated what was public

dankula did not break the law. he committed a social justice crime

no parole breached

The law exists to criminalize being grossly offensive, yes?

no.

If you're going to claim the law doesn't exist, then there's nothing that needs fixing.

Last time he went onto court property

it didn't exist prior to dankula being convicted of such crime

This time he only repeated the allegations

Did they make the law up on the spot?

They use whatever law they can get away with

You two aren't even making sense. Also, this silly argument isn't <#377519739380957184> material.

Deck of cards they play whatever they think they can

the way the british criminal justice system works, via laymans explanation to me, is that british law is determined by precedent, i.e. if there is no prior law regarding a specific crime, it is taken before a court and determined whether or not a crime has indeed occured, and then if it has, it is then judged and precedent is made by which all such crimes in the future will be pursued and treated

What occured is utter nonsense. Politically motivated as Tommy is getting bigger, day of freedom must really pissed them off.

in otherwords, if dankula had gone to jail, then all others commiting grossly offensive comedy would by then be criminalized and put in jail

I thought we were agreeing 😃

dankula was the pillar that fell down in terms of precedent, and now it's fineable for saying something racist

"Swift injustice" http://www.thelawpages.com/court-hearings-lists/crown-court-daily/33/lists/2018-05-25

or more specifically antisemetic

The law exists on the books before the precedent. The precedent determines the intricacies of how the law is applied, how it's weighted against other laws.

Aye, no precedent for what happened with tommy though

lol

Especially how quick the courts

i'm not talking about tommy specifically

No precedent for breach of a gag order?

im talking about dankula tbh

no gag order