Message from @Sin
Discord ID: 451099571301646346
I've seen it. Why do people think that they win this argument by just reposting the link to the archived stream?
He was reporting on it, he admitted he knew there was a gag order. The physical location where he reported from is irrelevant.
The more you argue against things that aren't wrong, the weaker your case becomes. Focus on the the things that are actually outrageous (if they're true.)
Like, Lauren Southern was spreading the thing about the Judge saying "so what if he gets killed?" That could be something to get people up in arms. If true, that is.
Basic truth he is inncocent. Repeating information already in the public domain is NOT a crime
Watch this space. He will be found innocent
Only gag was AFTER he was arrested
No, he said on his own stream, the media wasn't reporting on it because the judge told them not to.
Traitors support unjust imprisonment
utter morons
Yes because they are muslims
muslim are protected
but white males are not
basic truths
collusion
Count Dankula is not guilty and Tommy is not guilty
If tommy knew about the gag order, he shouldn't have done it
It's this simple
mmh, if he didn't want punishment sure
but if he wanted proper justice for the children used and abused by grooming gangs, getting public outrage in a ferver is the way to ensure the trial is squeezed for the correct decisions
A lynching mob would have been justice?
lol
@Sin
Yeah, but that's not a reason to "break" the law
He should have waited until the thing was over
mmh, if a cop tells you to not go into a burning building to save your baby, do you obey the lawful order, or you go in and get the baby?
HE didn't break the law. That's the problem
There is a law in place for the judge to do just that.
So... he did break the law, yes.
he broke his parole,
as far as i'm aware that's what happened
Count dankula broke the law?
no, tommy did
Both did, actually.
Dankula's is an unjust law.
No because he didn't enter the court, and repeated what was public
dankula did not break the law. he committed a social justice crime
no parole breached
The law exists to criminalize being grossly offensive, yes?
no.
If you're going to claim the law doesn't exist, then there's nothing that needs fixing.