Aure yuou guuys rueally duebating oun whuich vuersion uof Engluish uis muore standuard? YOU will never be able to figure out an answer so it might be best for YOU to pick another topic that you can really savoUr

Clearly the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes spoke English the best and had the best version considering they invented the fucking language

Shit I pray I only live to 45

Yeah it’s pretty fucking stupid

That’d be like French-Canadians fighting with French natives over who speaks French better

"Nous le parlons mieux." "Non, nous ne faisons."

Never mind

I was going to say something but as soon as this guy said to read anything from the Strasser Brothers I’m just never debating here ever

I can’t comprehend being that loony

That you’d only subscribe to Strasserism

You know why females vote for Democrats

It’s because of their morality

Women love others more than themselves so they want us to help everybody else besides ourselves

I agree

Whoever @ed me

What say you all to gays who reject the LGBT community, have conservative views, and earn a living by working and contributing to society?

That’s queer

No that’s fucking stupid

You don’t want gays to vote?

Even right winged gays?

No but some are, numbers doesn’t matter.

It doesn’t matter how many gays are and aren’t republican, they should all be allowed to vote. It’s like racial discrimination, it doesn’t matter how much it happens to race X as opposed to race Y, what matters is it happens and needs to be reduced as much as possible.

It’s like when the left cries out that women and blacks are discriminated against way more than white men so therefore white men should be ignored. Discrimination is discrimination and it doesn’t matter how much it happens to who, it shouldn’t happen at all is the principle.

So is this like a bunch of 15 year olds who just discovered Nazism and are going through your authoritarian phases?

Who put that reaction on my comment by the way

No I can’t

Not on the device I’m using

Oh

Not wanting discrimination isn’t a liberal idea. The solution of intersectionality that destroys the freedom of identity is a liberal idea.

Civilization is only based on discrimination because of intersectionality, the left likes to group people into races, sexes, and ideas, and use those to identify people, rather than look at people as people with qualities and unique traits. They don’t want people to be different and do things differently, they’d rather group everyone into categories, look at the category that is the worst off, and then springboard that category into the number 1 position until they realize that now there’s a new group at the bottom and so they keep reusing the same cycle, therefore creating discrimination without them even realizing it. The ones that do realize it are called communists.

No those are called laws, my son.

No we don’t actually.

Discrimination is defined as unjust. What we do to criminals is not unjust, it’s exactly the opposite.

On a very basic definition, discrimination is just identifying the differences between one thing and another. That’s not what we do to criminals. We don’t just look at them and say, “oh, these are criminals,” and go on our way. We justly punish them according to their actions. It’s not discrimination, it’s called justice.

Choke

On my cock

Heh

Lighten up

<:varg:521372050225627156>

Yes, that is basic discrimination, the kind of discrimination I’m talking about is when people are denied something based solely on race, sexuality, age, etc. Illegal immigrants are screened for criminal activity, diseases, malicious intent, and a plethora of other things that would justify them not being allowed into a country, especially the United States. Nobody looks at immigrants and says, “you can’t come in because you’re gay.” Or “turn around, you’re too black.”

Yes, I agree @Kazimir Malevich because those people are criminals, they aren’t being turned away solely for being black, or female, or gay.

I know @Deleted User and that’s why we don’t use the past to discuss the present and the future.

I’m not saying anybody is a liberal.

I’m certainly not one myself.

What group is that?

I believe that whites, and white men in particular should control society. We are best fit to do so. But there shouldn’t be any unfair advantages to that. We should be intelligent and proper enough to do it fairly, otherwise we must not be doing the best job we could be.

@Aki You’re right, it’s not an argument, it’s how our society works, and that type of discrimination is actually already illegal. If you are not accepting somebody into a country because it goes against “your own interest,” well who’s interest is it? Is it that specific border control employee? Is it ICE? Is it the whole country? I doubt you know the interests of the whole country. But if said immigrant will devalue your country based on just claims or actions such as criminal activity or refusing to work and contribute to society, but all means do not let them in. Otherwise turning away someone with no criminal record, who is eager to work and contribute to a country, solely because they’re gay or black is unjustifiable.

So instead of offering any counter or point of your own just tell me what you personally take my points for.

No, not you.

Well that’s why you use quotas, to keep the native population far higher than the immigrant population. That way it has nothing to do with discrimination and you just cut it off after a certain number.

Absolutely fucking not.

I’d only allow a number that would keep the immigration population half of the native population each year.

It could be whatever you want, it’s just a personal preference.

How does the amalgamation of races contribute to globalization?

Globalization occurs because it’s cheaper to make products in Indonesia and pay them 25 cents a day rather than employing Americans and selling higher quality American made products.

Oh you’re relating to isolationism vs internationalism then

Well more autarky then isolation

No

When you said Globalization my mind went to economics but you were talking about it in a political sense and I didn’t pick up on that until you said so

Unity of races has nothing to do with economic globalization though

Political globalization can influence economic globalization but not the other way around

Well actually let me rephrase

The factors of political globalization can impact economic globalization but economic globalization cannot be impacted by the factors of political globalization

I’m not pro globalization in any way

I want immigrants to immigrate legally to work in American business places to contribute to the American economy and sell American made products. But I don’t believe that your claim is true, simply because wage is first and foremost based on economic factors, so immigrants coming into the US are going to be paid a lot more than if a company were to pack up and open shop in India.

It has to do with the factors of supply and demand, that’s what sets wages and prices. Sure immigrants can be paid less but that’s only because they accept less money, and in the United States it’s no longer a substantial difference, unless we’re talking jobs in construction or other basic no-skilled jobs, which cannot be globalized.

You are correct that as the population increases, labor prices decrease because as more people come in needing work, there’s less of a demand for workers, but only in lower tier unskilled work, so immigrants that come in and study to become doctors or scientists will still be highly demanded, and as skill level increases, those are the jobs that get shipped out of the country along with the factory workers. So it’s a small amount of lower tier workers in factories only because they make the goods, but a large majority of occupations leaving are higher in the skill chain, like doctors, because of the medical innovations in France, for example. Doctors are leaving for France to make more money and learn modern methods of medicine.

When did I say the unemployed population doesn’t increase? We weren’t talking about unemployment, and I know that it increases, that’s a given. As far as higher skilled jobs go, people fill factories and unskilled jobs no matter what, because they don’t have to be special, as the skill level goes up there will always be higher demand.

I’m opposed to any and every type of globalization.

I proposed less immigration that what we have now. All I said that it shouldn’t be based on discrimination. There should be quotas that keeps the immigrant population at least 50-75% lower than the native population.

Unfortunately you’re right.

Yes, and that’ll happen with or without discrimination.

I think we can prevent or at least push off the unification of races by outlawing race mixing and introducing a form of eugenics.

As far as growth is concerned, I agree that people should move up the chain and new people should come into factories and so on and so forth. Just because I said people should be discriminated against doesn’t mean I like immigration nor do I support race mixing or whites becoming a minority.

I just said I support eugenics.

Segregation was great in my opinion because it kept the races to themselves while at the same time seeing blacks succeed just as much as whites economically and socially.

I agree

It’s a shame

Elaborate @Deleted User

I am

Indeed

Damn it

Do they have a work blacklisted here

Yep they do

MR KRABS I WANT TO SAY THE N WORD

What about

Hitler

Nazi

Burn the Jews

Pro tip

Use an upside down exclamation mark

So as I was saying, just because I’m anti discrimination doesn’t mean I’m not a white nationalist and anti race mixing. I’m very much a white advocate, as Mr. Jared Taylor would say.

What does btfo mean

If I get banned I’m gonna stab your wife

Oh well me too so bend over queer

Women shouldn’t be allowed to vote change my mind

What do you mean by System?