I'm from Amsterdam

Are you from Amsterdam @wahx

I'm from Amsterdam

I'm from Amsterdam

No

Weed needs to be banned for non-residents if the shops agree

Why can't the right admit that they are bad?

It is

Look at this bomber

Look at hitler

Hitler was a right winger

You see

Here it is again

Man of straw

I never said that

It's just that the right doesn't seem to be able to take any responsibility

He didn't

He privatized many industries

He may have had some leftist points on his 25 point program, but none of them where acted out

So no, he was not a socialist economically

He was a capitalist

He didn't.

He didn't support socialistic economic policies

He was a capitalist

He was right wing

Agreed

Hitler privatized many industries

Thats about the most capitalist thing you can do

I agree that he tried to portay himself as someone who cared about the working class

But in reality he was a big capitalist

I mean, that is what the fascists claim, but in reality it's a right wing ideology

And he believed in privatizing germanies key industries

Sure

I mean, wikipedia isn't necesarilly a bad source

But one second, I have to look in my files

That doesn'tmean you aren;t a white supremacist

No it doesn't.

So If I say that whites are superior to blacks and that we should deport all blacks from europe I'm not a white supremacist?

just because I admit asians have a higher IQ score

wow nice insult right off the bat

I never claimed that's what he said, respond to my argument

Answer what I said

No you didn;t

That doesn;t matter

You didn't really respond

Ok

So you admit that you can still be a white supremacist if you admit asians have higher IQ scores right?

All you need to do is say that whites are superior to some other race, or at least imply that.

Just yes or no

Not relevant

Stay on topic

is all you need to do to be a white supremacist say that whites are superior to some other race, or at least imply that?

Yes or no?

Stay on toic

Is the answer to my question yes or no?

Not a respond

How difficult is it to respond to my questions so that we can actually have a discussion?

Let's not work with useless google definitions shallwe

Now, could you answer my question?

Dictionary definitions are useless on topics like this

It's way more complicated then just a sentence

Yes they are

Are you a feminist?

Are you a feminist?

Ok, bye

You seem to be unable to have a discussion seeing as you can't answer questions

You just go on tangents and talk past me

Bye then

Blocked for now

@Obungus How do you mean?

I mean, it's a complicated subject and I don't think you can define things like this in one sentence, but I would say someone who says that white people are better then other races, because of genetic reasons.

I just defined it for you Obungus

I mean, I haven't listened to Jared taylor

But I am familiar with his kind, so I will make a general statement.

I do think that if you constantly atribute positive characteristics to white people (like high IQ) and then attribute negative characteristics to africans (being agresive) and then say that the cause that white people have all this positive attributes, and africans these negative atributes, is race. that yes, you then are implying that white people are superior to at least african.

And I would call you a white supremacist

I mean, depends on how you mean deny.

Let's slow down

And let me answer your first question

I don't deny that there are average differences in certain qualities between races no

For your second claim

I would say yes

I think that certain attributes are good, like most people would agree that a high IQ is good

now if you say that white people have higher IQs then other races, because they are white, then you are saying that white people are better in that deparment

now if you do the same with other characteristics, then yes you are a white supremacist

I mean, I don't think that this comparison is very valid. subspecies of insects can develop in just a couple of years, that doesn't mean that if we isolate two communities of humans for 10 years they will be two different subspecies

I know

I'm saying that you can;'t say that if cheetas develop subspecies in 30,000 years, then it must be the same for humans

However my opinion on these discussion is that it is pointless

Also that is quite the strawman, I don't think anyone is saying 100%

Just that environment plays a big factor

But back to the point

I think that these discussion are very pointless

Especially in an environment like this

This just seems to be purely scientific, all we can really do is throw studies at eachother

And I don't think that contributes to anything

I would just leave this matter out of politics for now, and leave it in the purely scientific.

Making it political only makes research capabilities worse

So yeah, that basically is my opinion on this. I have none on the science because I'm not a scientist, and doubt that anyone in here actually is