When you use a moral condemnation to describe someone instead of a neutrally descriptive term you're a polemicist and not documenting reality impartially

Ok, bye

im a white supremacist

like all trump supporters

White Powder

You seem to be unable to have a discussion seeing as you can't answer questions

You just go on tangents and talk past me

👃

Bye then

womp womp

Blocked for now

so sad to see you go

you refuse to define anything

I'll never recover

blocking people is for pussies, srsly get over yourself

@Obungus How do you mean?

What is a white supremacist?

someone who thinks whites are superior to other races

hush you

This is really the best point that has been made in the entire conversation so I'll repeat it one last time:
When you use a moral condemnation to describe someone instead of a neutrally descriptive term you're a polemicist and not documenting reality impartially.
"Racist" and "white supremacist" are vague synonyms for "jerk" or "asshole" and not intended to describe a position. The belief that East Asians score higher than whites on IQ tests and the belief that all black people should be killed are both "racist" which goes to show you how ridiculously vague of a term it is.

I mean, it's a complicated subject and I don't think you can define things like this in one sentence, but I would say someone who says that white people are better then other races, because of genetic reasons.

We are not asking everything a white supremacist believes

but if they exist then they have a defining quality

I just defined it for you Obungus

Does Jarod Taylor have this quality/belief?

I mean, I haven't listened to Jared taylor

well technically if its a fact then its not racist. like if i were to say that there is a higher percentage of black people arrested every year than whites. thats a fact, but it doesnt make me racist

But I am familiar with his kind, so I will make a general statement.

What is his kind?

Jared Taylor is a hereditarian i.e. he believes the black/white IQ gap is heritable.

Heritability basically means measured variation between individuals is a % result of genetic differences

we can determine this between individuals with twin studies

How it basically works is you get a group of fraternal and identical twins

If the identical twins are more similar in let's say height

you measure their height to be on average more similar

You know that even though both groups have the same "shared environment" at home, the identical twins ended up more similar as a result of greater genetic similarity

We assume that its' a 50% increase in genetic similarity

comparing identical to fraternal

And if you see a 40% increase in correlation of scores i.e. greater similarity that would roughly work out to a .9 heritability coefficient

or 90% of differences in height between individuals are a result of genetic differences

so what even is the argument here?