a lot of it seems to serve the youtube economy of likes and views

I think what would benefit the "community" more would be for Sargon to list a set of principles for people that want to be active voices against progressivism/social justice.

I don't like the idea of organizing it

I feel like he is trying to pivot coming off like a lil bitch into "we need to start a movement"

I think he wants something to get done, but doesn't want to risk being responsible for it, as if it would concede some moral high ground.

Although he already calls himself an activist, right?

What would you rather have? People orbiting an individual, or having a cause/purpose?

no leaders exactly

someone just needs to bring the bantz

there needs to be Trumps of every ideological variety

then we can have a healthy and memeable discourse

I understand as, that's the name that he chosed for himself

If people want to follow, so be it

One thing to think about.

Maybe he is trying to prove that he is not a leader, by creating a movement that no one will follow

That's some 2.5 D chess!

he should just ask for a rematch

Scroll up and you'll see Andy is preparing a second debate already.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/950527640489857024

^Tucker's twitter thread digging into Damore filing suit against Google

oh shit son

a rematch

we read through that lawsuit in <#372507611284766722> on monday, and I pasted that exact quote then

[3:37 AM] DanielKO: What could be a better description against Social Justice? Maybe True Justice?
Anti-Identitarian?

[3:39 AM] DanielKO: Liberalist sounds appealing to people on the left that aren't crazy, people on the center-left, maybe even center-right. But not conservatives.
Yes, but surely, any conservative worth his salt understands what it means and can put aside his feelings if he wants to "join" (whatever that means)

[4:00 AM] DanielKO: Then, there's the question, what would being a "liberalist" entail?
According to sargons video, he/someone should produce a list of principles, so I guess we'll know soon enough

[4:02 AM] DanielKO: One of the big problems of people that are fed up with Social Justice and Feminism: they don't know how exactly to articulate against SWJs and Feminists. Or against the Alt Right even.
That's actually the problem with any person trying to argue against any ideology when they're just a normal person with a family that has other daily things to worry about

Doctor Randomercam made a video talking about how an "anti-" denomination is a weak substrate for a community.

I think the idea is not that we just hate SJWs, it's that our principles are absolutely incompatible with their ideology. Some hate SJWs because bad targets, not bad tactics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tpBhHipMK4

yes, it's facebook cropped, and no I cbf finding the source atm (god forbid the uploader provide *that* in the description) but it's still a fun exchange

its not fun because its retarded

I felt that burn

what the fuck

can we just sum that up, he's an anarcho-socialist-libertarian democrat that wants workers to control the means of production?

and you're not allowed three houses

Bernie can have three though, because he's a *democratic* socialist, not a *libertarian* one

horree sheet
Charlie Kirk debated Hasan Piker? How did I miss this?

Piker is like a younger, dumber Cenk

Come to think of it, pretty sure he might actually be related to Cenk, which is how he got his job in the first place

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHLzNIGeQfA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzKZ7LdWC4c&t=18m50s

I can only get so erect

no more papi stali

Socialists get the ice pick too

lol

kek

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgdANNc6sLI

I have not watched it yet, but I haven't really been keeping track of what brendan did after he was ousted from mozilla, so I will

So what do you all think about Sargon video with the term “liberalist”

The purpose isn't clear.

i think Sargon was just butthurt over the spencer thing

eternally buttmad

seems so

Spencer got exposed as wanting an aristocracy.

Doesn't matter what happens to Sargon.

they're both idiots

Sargon is a sophist and Spencer is a paid shill

At least one isn’t delusional enough to believe that they will be KANGZ in the hwite ethnostate

maybe this is credit to Sargon? but there is at least a lot of open criticism of him here

I don't sense a circle jerk

https://www.scribd.com/document/368838846/Data-Breach-Prevention-and-Compensation-Act-of-2018-Final

cool

cool

cool

https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/951519115575025664

Get the SJW's cut in half with logic and reason and focus on the real problems

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/south-korean-president-credits-trump-with-bringing-north-korea-to-the-table/2018/01/10/ae0ee266-f606-11e7-91af-31ac729add94_story.html?utm_term=.14cbaedc4838

Just gonna leave this there so yalls can share to anyone that says we Koreans dont appreciate Trump.

At least the older generations like em more

well, err, actually, china and SK and other nations have brought both NK and the US to the table at least 5-6 times the past 30 years

and every time, the US has fucked it up

what your president is saying is just asskissing the donald

which I don't have a problem with

lol speak the truth and people will become angry

could he have had this leaked as red meat for his base to cover for the daca negotions?
i mean, that would be fucking beyond brilliant

GRRRRRR DRUMPF I CAN'T BELIEVE HE CALLED COUNTRIES THAT HAVE HIGH POVERTY RATES, SOCIALIST PROPAGANDA LEFT AND RIGHT, AND ALLOW FOR BARBARIANS TO RUN THE COUNTRIES "SHITHOLES"! PUTTING QUOTATION MARKS AROUND "SHITHOLE" MAKES ME LOOK LIKE I CARE ABOUT THESE PEOPLE!

I mean you guys have to admit that's kinda racist of him to say

How?

Are you implying that only minorities come from shithole countries

either way the president of the fucking united states shouldnt be using such labels to describe other countries imo

Some countries are shitholes

Bottom line is , it's racist

Haitians and Norwegians are different people and he prefers one over the other. That's racist

Having a preference for who has the privilege of coming into a sovereign country is not racist

So he would be ok with a rare black person from Norway? He sees no difference?

I do not think for Trump

Maybe one of their new Arab migrants?

And i do not speak for him

Well I can speak for him... of course he doesn't want a black person from Norway

Norwegians and Haitians are at quite distinct branches of the human species.

That's racist man

You are the only one pointing this out

The statement he made is only racist if you think only minorities come from shithole countries

You have projected your opinions onto a statement

Are Norwegians white, and Haitians black?

some white countries are shitholes... no wait... i cant think of one... nvmd