Message from @Reaps
Discord ID: 400692666205077505
One thing to think about.
Maybe he is trying to prove that he is not a leader, by creating a movement that no one will follow
That's some 2.5 D chess!
he should just ask for a rematch
Scroll up and you'll see Andy is preparing a second debate already.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/950527640489857024
^Tucker's twitter thread digging into Damore filing suit against Google
oh shit son
a rematch
we read through that lawsuit in <#372507611284766722> on monday, and I pasted that exact quote then
[3:37 AM] DanielKO: What could be a better description against Social Justice? Maybe True Justice?
Anti-Identitarian?
[3:39 AM] DanielKO: Liberalist sounds appealing to people on the left that aren't crazy, people on the center-left, maybe even center-right. But not conservatives.
Yes, but surely, any conservative worth his salt understands what it means and can put aside his feelings if he wants to "join" (whatever that means)
[4:00 AM] DanielKO: Then, there's the question, what would being a "liberalist" entail?
According to sargons video, he/someone should produce a list of principles, so I guess we'll know soon enough
[4:02 AM] DanielKO: One of the big problems of people that are fed up with Social Justice and Feminism: they don't know how exactly to articulate against SWJs and Feminists. Or against the Alt Right even.
That's actually the problem with any person trying to argue against any ideology when they're just a normal person with a family that has other daily things to worry about
Doctor Randomercam made a video talking about how an "anti-" denomination is a weak substrate for a community.
I think the idea is not that we just hate SJWs, it's that our principles are absolutely incompatible with their ideology. Some hate SJWs because bad targets, not bad tactics.
yes, it's facebook cropped, and no I cbf finding the source atm (god forbid the uploader provide *that* in the description) but it's still a fun exchange
its not fun because its retarded
I felt that burn
what the fuck
can we just sum that up, he's an anarcho-socialist-libertarian democrat that wants workers to control the means of production?
and you're not allowed three houses
Bernie can have three though, because he's a *democratic* socialist, not a *libertarian* one
horree sheet
Charlie Kirk debated Hasan Piker? How did I miss this?
Come to think of it, pretty sure he might actually be related to Cenk, which is how he got his job in the first place
I can only get so erect
no more papi stali
Socialists get the ice pick too
lol
kek
I have not watched it yet, but I haven't really been keeping track of what brendan did after he was ousted from mozilla, so I will
So what do you all think about Sargon video with the term “liberalist”
The purpose isn't clear.
i think Sargon was just butthurt over the spencer thing