well no I don't

a sociopath in display

is not just mimicking expressions etc, they are actively processing that emotion

but cannot appreciate its significance

I would speculate some kind of mirror neuron thing going on

and sociopaths do genuinely feel anger, resentment, etc.

some people who lack affect in near aspergers way are sociopaths, but by no means even a significant minority

sociopaths more often than not, process emotions of people going about

than do they deal with their own emotional life

dont you think ?

since manipulations is almost as if their primary concern

the idea is the true sociopath cannot deal with their own emotional life

or gain any insight into it

couple that with inability to feel remorse and you get your 3

my idea is that sociopaths should be dealt with according to their actions, if any deviant behaviors they display

it isn't based off of a collective spirit

as if they are a fact of life just as any other

that isn't what stops people from doing bad shit generally either

except like, Chinese people

and even there, it's a layer on top

No, I was talking about their destructiveness

A sociopath isn't destructive because he feels no empathy

They will more easily be destructive towards society, since they don't consider people or property as of having a value greater than utilitarian

but because he fears no consequence

yeah, that's reasonable

no sense of "sacred"

anyway, the idea is

and i almos forgot

a true sociopath would be unable to produce genuine music

so I'm looking for something that could contradict that because I don't think it would be too hard to find music by a sociopath

their obliviousness to danger almost as a rule comes from their huge self-confidence and sense of infallibility, which they find difficult to overcome

I could be wrong

i.e. huge ego

yeah, because every sociopath is a narcissist

by definition

likely due to the causation

actually I have some evolving views here, about the whole thing, but I don't know where that's going to go right now

everyone knows what a sociopath is, no one knows what a sociopath is

but yeah, music

the idea is, music is deeply appealing because it resonates with the true self

"touches the heart" you could say

good music I mean

will catch up with this later

gtg shop some groceries

I found new sources of fat, food cost now down to $2/day

61 dollars a month

my investments pay for almost 10 times cost of food

american christians really are revolting subhumans. I got a lecture in mental health concepts in different cultures, most of it being focused on perceived diseases according to folk definitions in different cultures, and it said whites in the american south actually believe in witchcraft and hexes

Faith of the American frontier, is one primitive, dumbed down, sensual worldview of sub-tropical areas

And betrays the spirit of the negro villages at every corner

American spirituality has had it's more high points, for example Unitarianism before it was pozzed

But Quakerism, Baptism, etc. are basically, with differences in assumed aesthetical appearanec (though sometimes even here as well) , are basically negro spiritualities adjusted to immediate suburban needs

amish are impressive

they are full nordic

the way quakers shake for example

it's nothing but a direct emulation of dark negro magic rituals

Just consider this - we are speaking about religions who were even persecuted by Anglicanism and Presbyterianism, themselves split from Rome

These people knew what they were doing

Which is itself again, very conflicting and peculiar

Because many Southern quakers

And other smaller sects of similar theology

are composed of people who are physically, 100% Northern in appearance

Tall, sturdy, hard working

Random image

Yet, even as early as 19th century, they were promoting completely subversive ideas

They invented the modern prison for example, which at the time, was a crusade to end all suffering

Typical reformism

Also, it's hugely important to notice how much these religons were geared towarrds the most strict and most slum-styled sense of conformity and uniformity

I think you are quite off base with the negro comparisons

Maybe in the south, but not quakers or the frontier

No blacks there

Blacks are not necessary

spiritually they are coal black niggers

Involution of the spirit, universally leads towards darker, subterranean forms of spirituality

but i emphasized

it's conflicting

because they as population, were perfectly capable of producing institutions of higher spirit

Involution?

and they as population, to amazement, were quite pure in their racial composition

@devolved in Evolian sense

Sounds like you've never actually been to America

bunch of bullshit

KKK was for example a first organization of Protestant whites which had a more racial and universal doctrine, rather than strictly clerical

fine upstanding Anglos

even the niggers behave

compared to the rest of the US

@devolved In terms of "being there" American religions are the most transparent in the entire world

Been reading too much Russian anti American propaganda buddy

That's a wrong assumption

I read Russian writers the least

I don't think it comes from that

I read 20 times more Americans than Russians

do you read Dugin

I've read him

fallot - "even the niggers behave" - most people do not even know how strange it even is that there are any niggers

strange how

Every provincial spirituality has, figurativelly speaking, Africa as it's homeland

But don't take this literally, I'm not pointing in direction of blacks as a group, or even towards association with them

why would there even be niggers in a healthy place

they were brought over to do slave labour

usual reason

Compare ritual, something that tries to establish unity with the higher order

And witchcraft, something that attempts to connect with certain energies, either benevolent or not

The animosity between Evangelical cults is nothing but animosity between adherents of one school of witchcraft towards the other

Again, I'm speaking in general dispositions

Understand this with a dose of flexibility

You can find as many or more adherents to such a worldview among Catholics or any other group

People are like that

But I'm speaking more of the general propositions of a particular theology

There is not much animosity between evangelicals

Unless you're considering Mormons evangelical or something

Any groups that take Bible as sole authority

Sola fide, Sola scriptura

And no high churhiness

Obviously, there is no need to elaborate much on how Protestantism in general, starting from Luther, ruined and profaned, or at best, democratized and primitivized everything it touched

Starting from it's opposition to existence of the sacral language, Latin, much similar to how Sanskrit for example was sacred to Hindus

To it's systematic annihilation of the sacredness and obscurity of the ritual component and it's replacement with "enchanted" flock of gospel preachers

there is tons of animosity between christian sects

although it's pretty hard to say protestantism was a step down when you realize how dalit the catholic church was from the start

pope_foot.jpg

it's like the difference between having one big organized tumor vs a million tiny independent tumors

either way it's still cancer

Protestantism was certanly a step down since it put empasis on preciselly that which was rotten in Christianity, while completely opposing that which was good

I don't know if that's true

That's the standard evolian tradfag position

The more you get to know actual old fashioned protestants, the harder it is to believe

@Deleted User 57835c2c Is this for example, a superior thinking to Protestantism, or inferior

http://www.azquotes.com/quote/1160319

a catholic exhibiting smartism is still a catholic wog dalit licking nigger feet

@devolved I'm not talking about individuals here, who can always act as superior personalities

even if their pope was holy and great, it is still their fault southern europe is brown instead of nordic

I'm talking about general dispositions of these faiths

"me smart me book hard 2 read :)"

2smart4u

Most of these individuals act more often than not in complete *opposition* to the *SPIRIT* (not necessarily formal requests) of these faiths

So what do you think of Mormonism

I think brigham young's mormonism is great

I am not sure what to make of this modern retardation

refugee 😃

canned tuna casserole 😃

I think that Mormon missionaries should stop looking like a couple of Americans from a mile away

brigham young mormonism was basically a whole different religion

And by that I mean like a couple of second hand car salesmen

Haha

I'm not saying Pope was great @Deleted User 57835c2c

twinky salesmen

used gayporn salesmen

Are you a polack or what

I'm saying that Protestantism made things worse, more difficult, introduced tons of misconceptions and ultimatelly, got everything possible wrong

if catholics are dalits and protestants actually managed to make catholicism worse, does that make protestants double dalits?

You see, in Catholic times, membership to a certain social caste, did not by definition mean difference in stated religion

Catholicism didn't interfere with it

Church dogma was that "Every man should have a lord"

catholicism does what islam does

It wasn't opposed to Aristocracy

back then it promoted radical purity in a fashion that made people into hypocrites

publicly virtuous and privately drunken whores

much like their pedophile priests

Yes, zealotry was one of the problems with Catholic doctrine

All that pope commicated was this: "none of the shit we are talking about is grounded in immediate experience. Regular people who mostly live in the immediate should be excluded so we won't have to face the inconvenience and have to deal with it."

That was preciselly it's more subtropical attitude

maybe that's got to do with the fact that they directly colluded with the Roman government to import POCs

thus bringing the subtropics to Europe in the first place

But never forget that Catholic Church was way less partisan and proletarian than what came to challenge it

The "depth" of the Bible is the product of abstraction and reason. But ultimately this is all removed a degree or more from the narratives in the Bible. So getting back to the stories gets us back to world we actually experience

@vigil#3835 You are giving "depth" the meaning that masses attribute to it, namely, the weight of emotional lessons

Or "foresight into achievements of contemporary science" at best

no I'm talking about all the theological fluff behind Catholicism

The stuff that pope is defending against the assault of the layman and his immediate experience

I certainly agree that Bible is best read without Catholic dogma in mind

But not from the same reason that Atheists do

Atheists read it literally not figuratively as intended

Even if they read it figuratively they still don't get it, but neverind

Yeah it's besides the point

That exactly is the point, that every story can be read from many different angles and with many different ambitions in mind

Reading and discussing the Bible is best done with somebody who isn't a complete normie

You can take a Bible story and contemplate on it from political perspective, from perspective of symbols, from historical perspective, from all these combined

From ritual perspective etc

I disagree the Bible is written the way normies think about the world, as figuration

the bible is written the way constantine wanted it to be so he could make a cancerously expanding dalit empire

and the new testament is probably 75% outright forgery

Hmmm I'm always in dilemma about the worth of NT myself

Revelations for example

Esoteric symbolism in disguise of prophecy

Or deranged phantasmagoria of the type of personality which Nietzdche has described as "man of resentment"

Saying that you are 100% certain on it's worth wouldn't be appropriate atm

I mean, some people are certain and decisive in what they will take from a certain work and what they will dismiss

Varg has a simple answer

Archaeologically and culturally, Bible isn't *us* hence screw everything written there

for some reason I was always quite drawn to the bible

I don't know if it's because my family was catholic for generations and generations and it had become congenital, or what

It has to draw you to it

Think about it

It's was written in the era, in the hotspot of mixed cultures and societies, and above all, mixed worldviews and spiritual proportions

It describes conflicts, agitation, breakdowns and rises of groups and ideas

It gives pages and pages of testimony in politics, religion, society, war

It deals with some of the most important societies to have existed, namely, Babylonian, Persian, Egyptian

And forces you to read between lines, since you are aware that narrator is being subjective

And forces you to take every symbol and study it, since it has got to have had both a significance, and a different meaning than a modern man, due to his separation from such a mode of thinking and speaking, cannot comprehend

Even if the worldview of the Bible is to be completely rejected

You still have to read it in preciselly in order to study it, and it's participants and their modus operandi

that is not even what draws me

what draws me in are two books, genesis and revelation

if you threw out all of the bible except those, I would not feel personally that I lost much

Personally i find the story of Hebrews in Egypt quite intriguing

What a great political and social drama, so misread by the general population eager for bedtime stories

most of that is garnish not the meat and potatoes of the story which everyone gets

it's great for hebrews, historians and hobbyists but that's about it.

Hebrews in Egypt is a great story. Not only political and social, but also personal drama.

@The Enlightened Shepherd

I dug around a bit because I remembered in the back of my mind

https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1085951

if you dig around you can find some prozak posts on there too

if I'm not misremembering

dauq did i just read

an old VNN thread where people try to dox Greg Johnson

I'm pretty sure Johnson himself used to post on VNN too

oh actually @Deleted User 57835c2c

this may be something you want to check out, I don't know

forums are degenerate

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2017/04/food-for-thought-ten-ways-to-save-the-white-western-countries/

and people who congregate on them are the worst of the worst

what about Discords

in all fairness, VNN was full of humourless nazi fetishists

who always tried to signal their hardness

these ten ways sound cool but they reek of "ethno-nationalist" sentiments

yeah that's them

i.e. history should stop from going on because we said so

close all borders and stop everything from happening

let me try

1. not close, but MAKE BORDERS

2. exclude people

3. bring about the reign of quality

how to enforce

4. shut down all revolutionary and democratic activities

5. scale back industry

I really doubt hunter Wallace is gay in any way

6. dalit grinder

He's a sensible southern man

yeah I was just looking around

7. reduce tolerance

7 sounds good

I mean you can stop there

I am so glad this wasn't a post about 25 things

Expectations: Subhumanity won't ruin everything it touches

Reality: Subhumanity ruins everything it touches

tell me how you feel @devolved

I can sense a desire to interject

Yeah but I'm doing other things

k