international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 234/3012
| Next
ur such a provocative cunt
you don't know the life I've lived
as a 12 year old?
And you get to make baseless assumptions
Age is a spook
And now my honeytrap snaps shut, FBI freeze! ๐ซ ๐ฎ ๐
Your egoist cabal is going into the slammer
Am I being detained?
@Deleted User STOP! You have violated the law!
Your stolen goods are now forfeit
Pay the court a fine or serve your sentence
egoists have invaded
*leaps into spookbunker*
Then pay with your blood!
ive fought mudcrabs stronger than you
โใใใใโใใใใโใ โ
โใใใใใใโฐโฏใ ใ โ
seattle has big problem due to the rise of minimum wage
merely a coincidence I'm sure
any farsi speakers on this server?
farsi is a real thing?
Also is there anything more pretentious than the forber quote of the day thing they do
MUH minimum wage socialism
Damn commies and their wage slavery
Just typical leftist having a backfire from their policy
war on poverty, another success
what practical purpose does theory even have
what has theory accomplished for the proletariat
Minimum wage isn't necessarily leftist. I don't support it.
I don't support anything that is meant to justify capitalist wage labor.
HURHUR LEFTISTS
any tax is socialism obviously
1% tax? S O C I A L I S M
Read basic economix(neoliberalism)
0.1% tax? N A Z I S
what next are we gonna live under big brother
Gommunism fails again, minimum wage sux
0.0000001% tax?
O P P R E S H U N
muh taxation is theft
mor privat roeds
>no good country has private roads
>lets make out country one with them
hmpf
Technically taxation is theft
Eating other organisms is also technically theft
Didn't Rome have like a 0.005% tax?
We had lower taxes under socialist regimes than now lol
At one point they did at least.
That's because there is more services now.
property is theft
because a sad man can crawl up to cancer medicine
and you can claim its yours
and by nap rules no one can counter you
government usually as well
#freeEverything
Taxation is theft
Property is theft
existance is theft
Stealing is theft
Existing is theft
<:Thonkeng:325807856228106250>
๐ค
I never claimed the minimum wage was socialism
But it's undeniable that the people pushing for this are more to the left
that's why i said leftist instead of socialist
Papa bless all
Any MLs here
breathing is theft of oxygen
^
Maybe if we came to a voluntary agreement with the trees we can have an exchange of oxygen and CO2.
Treat each other as the proletariat that we are.
Functional Discord server ^
>liberals trying to fix and legitimize capitalism is leftist
๐ค
Wouldn't the preferable option just be basic income.
The issue is rising living costs and capitalism not being able to compensate for that on it's own.
Minimum wage doesn't solve that and only minimizes the options people have while choosing how they work.
You're gay and glib and probably a kike lel
leftist is on a spectrum, again if people on the left but outside of socialism generally want a higher minimum wage
You're strawmanning so fucking hard
The one thing in our economy that has shown time and time again not to be able to compensate for a lack of equality is the government
The government is run by capitalists
In a sense but they always push for more government involvement, they go against the free market
The free market doesn't exist
The market is run on government currency
Also
b i t c o i n
"the market" is more full of capitalist collusion than competition
If they get to call more of the shots you get a freer market, I'm not talking about a 100 percent unregulated market
the free market is soon
They use their power to enforce more regulations, making it harder for anyone new to compete with them
They use the government to do it
Capitalists in the end want more profit against other capitalists, but they have much more contempt for their workers than they do for their fellow capitalists
Capitalists ike the government
I don't think you know that, the people on the top aren't the absolute monsters you portrait them at
contempt in a symbiotic relationship
they know this regulation stops the chances of workers rebellion
Certain capitalists yes, but not the ones who are just starting
Do you mean petite bourgouise?
You agree that the government is in the pockets of big corporations right>?
No
All governments have class nature
It is one of the capitalists
So what do the lobbyists do?
influence government to restrics the free market
starting a small busines nd not being wage cucked makes you evil tbh
wallmart lobbied for a minimum wage
they can take a hit from higher wages, the upcoming business cannot
tbh running a meme small tech business sounds great. Get a couple of m8s who know how to tech and see where it gets us
I'm strawmaning?
that's how silicon valley got big
little restrictions on who they could hire and how they could work
@Timo))) What is ur ideology/tendency?
I'd say libertarian
But I've been more socialist a few years back and a little more pro government before this now
Sure
@Timo))) would u like to have a peaceful debate
Sure but it's really late here, but I'm on a lot here
next time
@BoleslawBierutLover if you want a sekret club serverm don't leave links laying around
@Shaggy Blanco being exiled is not a punishment we have plenty of exiled in our server
exile, a way of being told to fuck off nd presumably die leaves a very distinct impression
@Shaggy Blanco did u leave?
yep, assumed it was a meme punishment roles like in several other serbers ive been in
u can join back
"Daily News Thread 7/12 "
thats oddly very attractive never thought i would see a nun that way
Anybody who watched the video I posted this afternoon, are there any thoughts or criticisms that you have about it?
@Danov It was fine
Want to watch my cringy videos
?
Funnily enough, you're the first person to call it cringey.
MY CRINGY
@BoleslawBierutLover show me whatchu got
hi
No Huns allowed.
oh ok
Yet we allow animals like neoliberals in?
Why did I get linked this
I'm an anarcho-capitalist
You're also a gay baby lel
lol k
What led you to capitalism and Austrian economics
Who hurt you
logic, statistics, and practicality
๐ค
Any specific reasons
That the state only serves to perpetuate itself and take the liberties and property of the people
While selling it as for their own good
Oh word
The power behind the upper class doesn't worry you?
lets kill the rich
Oh it does, but not because of the upper class themselves, merely their ability to lobby government into monopoly-perpetuating regulations
You don't think some monopolies tend to develop in certain industries? Or regions?
Lobbying is obviously one of the corporation's greatest strengths.
Well, without state regulation, any monopoly could only perpetuate itself by either outperforming the competition or providing the best prices. State monopolies on the other hand are maintained by regulation and force.
Private property and capitalism need to be maintained by force though anyway.
I mean you'd just have private companies acting as government, no?
No, that violates the NAP
as such
people with guns tend to stop those that use means of aggression
Guns are good. No guarantee in a world with large centralized military and nukes I suppose.
How do you define a state?
A means of involuntary control and theft maintained by force funded from said theft
As Murray Rothbard puts it, there are two ways to make capital, the *natural means*, that is to apply labor to natural resources and exchange the products of that labor, and the *political means*, that is to steal pillage and loot. The state is the organization of the political means.
You see though that lefties tend to think both the government and capitalist organizations fit that description.
The surplus labor point?
They see both as theives
A job is a voluntary agreement between employer and employee.
That "surplus labor" that lefties like to say is stolen is that of the person who puts effort into running a business, and fronts the financial risk to create one
@Apophis False, you ignore that somebody who does not own the means of production and had no initital resources has absolutely no choice but to sell his labor power to somebody above him
No, he has the choice not to, but he'll deal with the consequences of not actually working to survive
the employer offers a voluntary alternative to inevitable starvation
It isn't the question of working, it s the question of being subject to somebody else's expoloitation
as workers do not get the value of their labor
A choice having consequence does not make it not a choice. It isn't exploitation
Yes it is
Yes they do, they get what they voluntarily agreed was their labor's value
But they do not have a choice
they must sell themselves to a capitalist
Yes they do
They can choose to face the consequences of refusing to contribute to something
That is not much choice, be exploited here or here. Talk to anybody who actually works because you clearly don't, nobody fucking likes their job
@Apophis People want to contribute something they actually want to it isn't about being lazy you retard
*I can't actually disprove so I throw ad hominems and non-cited, false consensus anecdotes*
I just did
I said people must sell themselves to a capitalist. They are subject to them, that is not a free choice
Capitalists need to make a profit
And as such they need to pay their workers less than their value, that is exploitation
Capital is the measure of contribution to society. If one does not contribute, then they should not freely recieve the property of those who do
Smh, but they must contribute to a capitalist, somebody profiting off their labor.
@Apophis join vc of this server you have so much misconceptions I cannot type this
Yes, and capitalists make their money providing goods and services to those who need or want them
I don't *do* voice chat
Than we are done here
Fine.
@Apophis Get a job please.
Don't critisise people who contribute when you yourself do not
That's not how leftists define a capitalist. Which is fine.
Maybe ask around for some books
Or something
Right, it's not like I work to provide the internet I'm talking to you with @BoleslawBierutLover. Quit your ad hominem bs
>Capital is the measure of contribution to society.
What about volunteering or unpaid work? It is a bit cynical to say all contributions are reducible to creation of capital. It is not mandatory and when someone else takes the credit for you work, that's exploitation also.
Alright, you can choose not to accept capital for work. As a proponent of voluntary charity, I'll concede that, but in general that claim stands. They've contributed labor, or goods, or whatever it may be, and that causes them to get capital
hence why those the consumer favors get more
So it is possible to do unpaid work. There is not a necessary relationship between work and capital. Therefore your statement that capital is a measure of contribution is arbitrary and assumes something that is not inherent in the nature of labour. Capital is optional result of labour, among many things. You are putting too much weight on the assumption that all society ought to be run this way. This is called ideological bias.
there is a relationship between work and capital, if some wish to not take any form of capital for their work that's fine, I've nothing against that. But people are generally compelled to make a profit, and it's through labor, be that as a business owner or as an employee of a business that satisfies the consumer, that that capital is made. Therefore, while work can be done without making capital, capital cannot be made without doing work.
Are investments considered work?
Yes
That's kind of what investing is
So the act of buying and selling is considered work, probably the minimal kind. Should you get paid according to the amount of work?
You should get paid based on voluntary agreement as to what the labor or exhange is worth. If the investor voluntarily agrees with the investee that he should get X return on profits, and both parties are okay with that, then X return of profits would be the value of the investor's contribution
Fuck no, investing isn't work
Wanna elaborate at all?
Yes, but i have no idea why someone would think that in the first place
Well when you say "work", do you mean profession, labor, or what?
>voluntary agreement
Here is the problem. If the conventions of the market are not favourable to you, you can not negotiate with it, else you have no market. You are assuming that all traders have equal footing. If you are in a disadvantaged position, as dictated by the market, there is no such thing as 'voluntary agreement'. You will starve.
Again what I said workers are subject to what the capitalists decide for them
Yes, and one can choose not to contribute through work and face the consequence of starving. The employer merely offers an alternative
VOLUNTARILY
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 234/3012
| Next