memes
Discord ID: 634415983741763594
23,847 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 40/96
| Next
time to up your game, @HemRoy5
https://twitter.com/yungshitpostr/status/1205623390968729602
I OWN THIS GAME NIBBA
looool ๐
endorsement already retracted, but funny anyway
https://twitter.com/scrowder/status/1205577660052758528
i saw that
They love themselves so much 59% dont try to kill themselves
dafuq are these memes
A joke <:SeriousSloth:465727181570572289>
Jk
Love you bro
No homo
That dosen't even apply to me because I've never had that avi
We must follow suit
@BasedChris This quote is mostly taken out of context.
<:really:640412966008913940>
<:Yes:639977935209627658>
Here, Rothbard is discussing the different potential perspectives on children's rights and their conclusions.
He is asserting that a moral obligation to the parents not to agress against their children is not the same as a positive obligation for them to feed and take care of them. He is essentially making a reductio ad absurdum argument.
His preferred perspective was that the parents become 'trustee-owners' of children which inherently comes with the obligation to take care of the child until that child demonstrates the ability to take care of itself by leaving home, which is when Rothbard beleives the child becomes an adult, able to consent to things adults are typically able to consent to.
You can disagree, which is fair, but Rothbard didn't beleive what you think he beleived.
Still think selling kids is okay, though.
@BasedChris
He literally says
You donโt have yo feed your child
Nope, you took that out of context. As I've just said.
How can you misinterpret that?
Tell me
That was an excerpt from The Ethics of Liberty. There's an entire chapter on children's rights. The book is totally free on the Mises Institute website. Maybe go read it?
Some Libertarians beleive that by birthing a child, you put that child in a position of vulnerability, which comes with an obligation to care for it.
For example: If I take you for a ride in my car, and were going at high speeds, and I command you to get out, does my right to ownership over my car obligate you to kill yourself, bailing out of my car when I'm going 70mph? No. I'm obligated to slow down, and let you out safely.
If *I* put you in position of vulnerability, such as if I pushed you into a lake, I'd be obligated to fish you out, lest I be held liable for your death. I, as a random bystander, am not obligated to put my life at risk to save you, I can't be held liable for your death.
Such a stupid way to think of each other in a group tbh
You ensure your safety by taking care of everyone else but yourself
High trust society time
The libertarian position what you said is very similar to what Ching chongs are doing
Itโs so disgusting tbh
You know when you're on an airplane, and they fell you to fix your own oxygen mask before helping others? You beleive in the reverse of that. But do you know why they tell you to not be a hero and help yourself before you help others? Because you can't help anyone when suffocating to death.
A person who isn't a qualified lifeguard shouldn't risk their life trying to fish out sombody, when they can't swim as well as a lifeguard could.
There's being altruistic, then there's just being an idiot. That sort of disregard your own wellbeing is what brings a collective down.
You take what I say so incredibly autisticly, OFC you donโt put yourself in a position which youโll be unable to help more people with, thatโs lack of long term thinking
Bro, philosophy is pretty autistic. But yeah, collectivism is the default. Doolittle is right about property being a familial institution. A society based on property wouldn't be one dominated by Sargonite individualists.
Why would you base your society on property instead of your people?
Isn't having the requirement of having an oxygen mask on a plane a positive obligation though?
@Angry. A society based on people is a society based on property. People make property.
Not really. It's not as if anyone is forcing you, they advise you to do it, for obvious reasons. @imozzietrash
I'm meaning that in an autistically libertarian society airline companies could just not have oxygeon masks
Would that be breaking the NAP or some other tenant?
Depends. Consumers make dumb decisions imo, even in today's regulated markets. They fly on planes with designs that have already proven faulty because they just don't know any better.
But yeah, the market bends to the will of the consumers. Consumers will eat soup that has literally been simmering for 4 decades. Who are you to judge? If they want oxygen masks, they'll get them if they want them.
I personally have my reservations. People are dumb, afterall. But I don't think the government is any better in a lot of cases.
I don't see any obligation to obey what the government see as "best for us", that's subjective. It's all dependent on their ability to force their subjective will on you.
Ngl I usually disagree with Libertarians in the ethics department because their ethical systems become so complex that the average citizen either can't understand, or won't care to.
With all of that in mind why would you be a libertarian?
The society is managed by all the millions of consumers
and you admit that they're dumb?
That's subjective. Will is subjective. Might makes right, basically.
That's the perspective of an atheist, yes.
Not necessarily.
Weaboo now all Iโm thinking about is a chick birthing a child out of a car going 70 mph
the thing is, why do we need to apply ideas like 'trustee-owner' or 'rightful owner' or anything like that, when we have the idea of 'parent and child' already? Are these ideas more specific, do we gain anything out of them? Not really, we already have a word for the parent-child relationship
its a bit like those memes where you endlessly define something, you define every word in its definition, and every word in that definition
wat lol
Is that from that fucking porn comic
That people keep spamming
Disgusting shit
Some 1488
Hooks up with that girl
Disgusting
People keep spamming that shit on /pol/
Disgusting
<:picard:429195062266691595>
@BasedChris Dosen't hookup. Just becomes friends. Lol
It's funny. Skyla is cute.
"just becomes friends"
bruh moment
holy ffffff
๐ญ
that fucking video got me
There's around 6 trillion cookies in that tray, Milo
get the DLC - *The Ballad of Gay Milo*
โFEDโ neck tattoo is a nice touch.
Bottom right
@Str3tch curses be upon you for that ghastly meme
By Allah, Itโs 600,000 at most, they added a zero.
in disguise?
have the strength to do what epstein didn't
kill yourself
@Sgt.McVeigh Did Ilhan really get trolled by a Greta parody account? Link
Those tweets are all real
Greta Thunberg tweet?
<:yay:638817157840502815>
I was the 69696th user on the unofficial leftypol server to say the n word
the only thing you ever do when you have a lot of blood handy is find the nearest mirror and start writing
this is the only proper way to use blood
maam you are suffering from mental fembrain
look I had a nosebleed in the shower once
and what else are you gonna do with all that blood
you can't just waste blood
go to the nearest mirror
write some cryptic shit
why the mirror?
why not the walls?
wipes down easier
gay
just in general cleaning mirrors is easier
cleaning is for women
<:dab:395562678153904128>
yeah so if you use the mirror then you do less cleaning which is less womanly
why clean it at all?
when you could be full man
and just leave it
@Slavic Infidel the WW2 collage clip you posted, do you know where is the music from? What is the name of the track? Great deep fried tech beat
@Jess I shazamed it and it said "Behemoth Remix, perturbator and GosT."
@Slavic Infidel many thanks slav bro
Cat: my legs have given out from under me and I can't breath
Human: M E G A C H O N K E R
I dont remember the reference <:athHM:647800394612998166>
Final Fantasy 6
i.e. the best one
I don't get it
iirc those were mock-ups used by the CIA to look around Argentina and see if Hitler had actually survived the war and escaped there under a different identity
@Norik he did
my friend drew this caricature of me when I was in high school.i used to be a leftist. big oof.
I can only name like half of those anime characters
so not a weeb
gas
b-based
auth unity is killing furries
Wtf is a chemical waster
You also didn't notice the second caption
"iinto"
Short for chemical waste disposal bucket
Itโs a large abs plastic waste bin
But itโs a tradie term idk why itโs used there
Iโm a Chem E and Iโve never heard โchemical wasterโ in my life
They just misspelled "chemical waste"
Pretty funny ngl
My grandma always just said "take it or leave it".
So am I the only one who actually loves sprouts?
theyre good
dont overcook then mash with butter
They're okay with butter
But I don't mind on their own
Yeah can sombody explain how beauty is objective?
I'd say that ultimately beauty is subjective but it is influenced by our biology.
You can find outliers with weird tastes
and you can find things that most people find beautiful
but its probably biological
asymmetry where there's supposed to be symmetry is a sign of unhealthiness
thus ugly
so symmetry would be objectively beautiful
at the same time, though, randomness and chaos have their own beauty
the explosion of a firework, the billowing of a cloud
yeah, i'm talking about certain facets in nature and living organisms
and saying that unhealthiness means ugly is a very biological take on it like I said
yeah
23,847 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 40/96
| Next