Message from @Weaboo Kempeitai
Discord ID: 655497721725190186
You take what I say so incredibly autisticly, OFC you don’t put yourself in a position which you’ll be unable to help more people with, that’s lack of long term thinking
Bro, philosophy is pretty autistic. But yeah, collectivism is the default. Doolittle is right about property being a familial institution. A society based on property wouldn't be one dominated by Sargonite individualists.
Why would you base your society on property instead of your people?
Isn't having the requirement of having an oxygen mask on a plane a positive obligation though?
@Angry. A society based on people is a society based on property. People make property.
Not really. It's not as if anyone is forcing you, they advise you to do it, for obvious reasons. @imozzietrash
I'm meaning that in an autistically libertarian society airline companies could just not have oxygeon masks
Would that be breaking the NAP or some other tenant?
Depends. Consumers make dumb decisions imo, even in today's regulated markets. They fly on planes with designs that have already proven faulty because they just don't know any better.
But yeah, the market bends to the will of the consumers. Consumers will eat soup that has literally been simmering for 4 decades. Who are you to judge? If they want oxygen masks, they'll get them if they want them.
I personally have my reservations. People are dumb, afterall. But I don't think the government is any better in a lot of cases.
I don't see any obligation to obey what the government see as "best for us", that's subjective. It's all dependent on their ability to force their subjective will on you.
Ngl I usually disagree with Libertarians in the ethics department because their ethical systems become so complex that the average citizen either can't understand, or won't care to.
With all of that in mind why would you be a libertarian?
The society is managed by all the millions of consumers
and you admit that they're dumb?
That's subjective. Will is subjective. Might makes right, basically.
That's the perspective of an atheist, yes.
Not necessarily.
Weaboo now all I’m thinking about is a chick birthing a child out of a car going 70 mph
the thing is, why do we need to apply ideas like 'trustee-owner' or 'rightful owner' or anything like that, when we have the idea of 'parent and child' already? Are these ideas more specific, do we gain anything out of them? Not really, we already have a word for the parent-child relationship
its a bit like those memes where you endlessly define something, you define every word in its definition, and every word in that definition
wat lol
Is that from that fucking porn comic
That people keep spamming
Disgusting shit
Some 1488
Hooks up with that girl
Disgusting
People keep spamming that shit on /pol/
Disgusting
<:picard:429195062266691595>
@BasedChris Dosen't hookup. Just becomes friends. Lol
It's funny. Skyla is cute.
"just becomes friends"
bruh moment
holy ffffff
😭
that fucking video got me