It's not separable though. You have to have a reward for the people doing the auditing.

Whatever blockchain network someone sets up, there must be a reward for the "miners" the people doing the auditing of the network, and that must be a token/currency.

Oh I'm not saying entirely divorced from it, I just mean that people are attempting to use it as a medium for other systems

pure P2P messaging and such

@Jeremy-Retard I've thought about it but I'm not to sure about getting into it

Well, discord is p2p/torrent messaging is it not?

servers are not "servers" any more, they're distributed records, aren't they?

I've never got into crypto, but the service writer told me to my face that Bitcoin should be outlawed because the government can't control it

Like they do with the dollar

I informed him that the federal reserve is a private bank and he had it backwards

Service writer?

The government should have no power over the dollar especially with an organization such as the FED that has zero oversight

I was under the impression that Discord runs on remote cloud servers

with admins having access to logs but promising not to use them, pinkie swear, and all that

But anyone can start a server with a client command. This tells me that discord doesn't have centralized servers, that instead any peer invited to a "server" is merely another auditor on the network that maintains the chat record and distribution.

I work at a truck dealership

Ah, that makes more sense Edgar

https://twitter.com/MediaJuggernaut/status/987427337879871488

Hey, can I pose a question to everyone??

Go for it

I'm in

I'd like to see what your thoughts are on arming teachers. I got into a hot debate over it last night and I want some further input

if they go through the training and consent to it yes

I'm all for it however I'm with Robert on this I would like to see extensive training and prep for the teachers and it would in my mind be a volunteer thing

However I don't want to see in the case of a school shooter a bunch of teacher running around the halls hunting the shooter

But all in all I'm not opposed to it

I don't think I've ever seen anyone that believes in arming teachers suggest that they should go hunting the shooter.

The idea for me is that the teachers suddenly become able to defend their class in some way other than standing in front and taking the bullets.

The idea for me is that I want a shooter to be forced to wonder who's going to shoot back. Someone in a different server pointed out that a school resource officer is a giant billboard that says "shoot this guy first and you're home free". Which i hadn't even thought about

That is a really good point. I hadn't thought of it either.

It makes schools less of a soft target.

CCW

?

Concealed carried weapon

Yes

I just didn't know if you called it something different

Damn. I'm just catching upnin the chat and so far Inser that it wnt from opinions about currencies, to crypto, and to something about p2p/torrent messaging. Then goes into so.ething about discord running on remot servers. And then we are to arming teachers lol

Okay, so to get my opinion in. I want to make it a personal opinion rather than a general one (sorry not sorry about this). I would love for my kids to grow up in an all white community and I would homeschool, but if they went to public school, mynchildren would only gonto school where their teachers carried.

So I'm all about teachers carrying rather than implementing stringent gun regulation, bc that's where we are today, right? We convince the public that teachers carrying is the right alternative to stringent gun regulation for every gun owner as a solution to reckless teens.

That's a valid opinion I might disagree on the all white part but that's because I prefer women of the darker variety

And pale gingers

Haha, that's no less non - pc of an opinion than my own preference. Just as long as we all realize this, it's all good.

"Might"

@Saint, I also agree with everything you said in your second to last comment.

4th**

Yeah I am in the mind set that if it doesn't interfere with the values that I uphold, then I have no problem with "free association" to be non triggering

Sorry to nit pick, but what sort of freedom of association would interfere with your values?

That is just non triggering way of saying integration

Would policy that enforces non integration interfere with your values?

I would have to say yes a big thing for me is people freedom to choose who they want to spend their time with

You do know i wrote "non integrarion," right?

Oh whoops change that nvm

I'm bad at reading... dyslexia

The ultimate question is: what would the American demographic do in an America that doesn't have integration quoatas?

Good question

America in some lite is a veey secretive tyranny, bc not only do we have i tegration policies that divides whites, but our econimic system also pressures American business (which are predominanly white owned) to hire non white leople2.

Sorry bout the grammar spelling errors...

I think that if we followed the same political course then we would still have the racism and patriarchy claims because the same problems have plagued minority communities for decades

....as if it weren't obvious, i suppose I should state that I'm a white nationalist.

I gathered as much

I asked a white nationalist if I'm white enough for the ethnostate. Apparently I'm white enough to sully the aryans with my impure genes but I'd need a license to marry someone of equal impurity

Simply...and only bc it seems ridiculous to forsake our ancestors, and if anyone would.loke me to clarify that statement i would be glad to.

which ancestors?

The founders of the country

your ancestry goes back further than that though, does it not? can all of those ancestors get fucked?

I'm not defending that person, but there always does need to be a line, ya know. Has to be drawn somewhere.

Oh I just found it funny

he used the Nuremberg Laws iirc

Fundamentally, historically (which is indisputable fact) America was created by Europeans for European people.

They conquered the land.

Im not in agreement with him totally but the more I see in the news the more I think its heading towards a drastic racial shift

right but Europe isnt homogenous and there were always "better" and "worse" Europeans

In my definition the White race are people of European descent. The sub categories like German, English, Belgian, etcetera are all European and White.

Okay....

right but the point of white nationalism is the elimination of tribalism

Those are ethnicities within the Race

through the removal of the outgroup, is it not?

No!!!!

no? So how do you get a white state?

Note: I didnt say gas the blacks

Segregation?

The removeal of out group within the white race. Radically we would like unity amongst ourselves.

sorry, the outgroup *within* the white race?

like my assumption is that the goal of the "ethnostate" is to have a state of only whites

or mostly-whites, at least

That won't really work you will have dissidents not only outside of your race but also within it

right but that's a different issue

because there's always the political issue

The removal of the outgroup within the European group

but just going off of race/ethnicity right now

okay, so I'm correct in stating that the goal is removal of non Europeans (within whatever % of racial purity)

but the issue with that is the fact that those individual ethnicities weren't really unified until they shed their ethnic ties. Whose to say there wouldnt be the same thing with a removed outgroup. Looking through the lens *of* white nationalism, people look out for their own right?

but there's a lot of ways to split "my own"

Get "whitrs kut kf your head kr vocabulary. Just think "European."

I dont really care which term you use, the same issue arises

the Irish and the British hatefucked each other for hundreds of years. Same with the English and French, the French and Germans, the entirety of the Balkans

Not removal (we're already the majority and rulenourbown countries and nations, the idea is simply to maintain that.

well if you just want immigration control and to produce more kids, there's no problem here

fill your boots m8

that's not the typical position, however

Whites out of*

White nationalists call that "hateducking" Brothers wars, and we demand an end to the Brothers wars.

Maintaining majority is not a problem for me but I will never take the white nationalist or ethno position because of my feelings about freedom to choose who you spend time with

No more brothers wars.

And I like darker women way to much

all Europeans are not brothers though lol

this is like a weirdly romantic view of Europe, and a cynical view of everyone outside it

It is kinda simple

For me, White nationalism means that European states no longer fight each other, we realize that our culture is worth preserving, that Europeans are stronger together, because even though we have bought many times we also have many things in common such as enemies food geographic location and religion not to mention genealogy. We also need to realize that Europeans as defined as the Wave Race only make up about 10% of the world's population. Within our own nation's we act like we rule the world and are the majority. But on a Global perspective European people that is white people literally make up 10% or less of the world's population and in every one of our nations or countries hundreds of thousands if not millions of non-european people flood into our countries every single year. And that is fine that is completely fine if European history and culture mean nothing to you. If that sort of thing does matter to you, then you have to realize then we are in some deep shit as a people. We literally could be bred out of existance within a century if we don't gain some sort of in group preference.

You are right all the Europeans are not Brothers but that's what we advocate for

Bought =fought

Wave=White

Right but I dont see it happening any more than I see racial tension completely going away. It's not like the USSR starved off Ukrainians and the English and Irish killed each other and the Germans killed the Polish and everyone in the Balkans murdered each other for no reason. It's the same tribal reasons you apply to other races. It comes from the same place

so how is it that you can eliminate it from European ethnicities but not non-European ethnicities, especially when we have advocates of Western values from non Western regions, and the people *in* Western nations seem to largely want Marxist memery?

It's not the same, because we put the tribal-ness behind us

are you sure? US politics seem pretty tribal to me

I mean sure you have to agree with me that it is completely within reason to argue for the unification of European paper but it is completely not within reason to argue for the unification of Saudi Arabia Michael Chinese people and European people like that is aski g too much

Paper = people

I'm using talk-to-text and I'm in the middle of a busy ass bar so I'm sorry if my texts are kind of incoherent

I havent been having too much trouble translating autocorrect-tier word replacement

but I dont agree, no

Sikh's get along with Europeans in Canada better than the former Yugoslav states did, by several orders of magnitude

I'm going to back out of the chat and go talk to peeps. I'll catch up later. Ttyl

The way I see it and this might be the liberal in me showing and I know you will disagree but I would like the values I hold dear the values the I seek to uphold and that I took an oath to defend are shared amongst everyone

Fijians and Asians are bigger proponents of western values than the masses of European marxists. And alright

Yeah that's where I'm at, DA

But don't forget, this is about PRESERVING a culture, not gstting along with another foreign one and mingling fantisifully

You preserve a culture by bringing forward cultural practices

I do HEMA and have started playing Violin. I read classical literature and listen to classical music. I bring those things forward and sell them to other people

Asians are Fierce proponents of American freedom because they know that if they can become the majority of America then they can change it in their favor. Do you think that wants some Asians become majority but they are going to give any leeway to people who aren't Asian no they're not they defend Western freedom because that freedom can get them the majority they want. Which is the majority I'm advocating for. European Americans are already the majority. All I'm advocating for is that we maintain that. No other people on the face of the planet would give away their Nation to foreigners except crazy dumb white people

I can tell you right now that people fleeing from the Chinese government don't want the west to become China

just like people who fled the USSR dont want to bring that shit over here

honestly a lot of groups like that are *more* sympathetic if anything. China really did a number on its own heritage *for the party*

But they wouldn't mind if Asian population surpassed a European population within their own nation. That is also true.

there's a difference between wanting and not minding, but even then a lot of Asians actually actively speak out against that shit

so no, that's not necessarily true either

Lots of Westaboos

White people matter. That's all I'm saying. We habe the same rights to nationhood as any other people.

I think the issue you're looking at is the weakening of cultural values

which is why a lot of socialists think there's no white culture, and honestly come by that opinion rather than being malicious cocksuckers

I mean, there's no monolithic culture, but there's an American culture and a Canadian culture and an English culture etc

I do think in reality there are better cultures though

oh absolutely

I'm not a cultural relativist by any means

I admire governments that put thenpreservatkon of their people above anything else. Lije the Japanese, Polish, Chinese, Congolese etcetera. And America was always good, unifying Europeans upnuntil the 1960s. Post 1970 has brought us today. In 1965 America opened up its borders to non-european people. If that had not happened we would not be having the divisive conversation that we are right now and neither would anybody else. Because we would be unified as a second Europe. The European people would stretch from the European continent across the north American continent and it would be known and it would not be questioned. It is our openness and our liberalism that has brought us to the conversation that we have today.

I wouldnt consider China admirable at all. Also China is multi-ethnic

ok. In what universe is Europe united, or has it ever been united??

and Japan stomped all over its smaller ethnicities, and now people are seeking that cultural heritage again

in none lol

thats "the dream"

If I remember correctly, we went over to Europe twice in the beginning of the last century because none of the white people could get along

I hear what you're saying about China, but the Chinese people are a broad category in the same way that European people are. People from Europe or european people are known to be simply as white people everybody in the world knows that. China is a large country and everybody knows there are many ethnicities within it however all around the world if you are from China we still say you are Chinese it's a general term we all get it we all understand Chinese is the equivalent of white

not to mention the fact that if all Europeans can get along, what purpose do the colonial nations serve?

and no, a lot of people from China do not call themselves Chinese

and hate China

Europe has been a hotbed of landgrabs by different ethnicities of white people for almost as long as the Middle East has

Well again your point is the same as what I'm saying a lot of people in Europe don't like the European Union however we Outsiders will still call them European

European Union is not a nation, it's like saying people are NATO

There are regions of China trying to break free from the whole. Those places are still recognized by the Chinese government *as* Chinese, but if you call those citizens Chinese they will call you ignorant

The European Union might not be a nation but that area and geographic location might be stronger then a nation. The European Union is composed of All European people it has its own military force led by the United States called NATO, each state has its own military force like France has its own England has its own Germany has its own, each has their own Constitution, just like each United States has its own Constitution you could say that the European Union is just as strong if not stronger America as long as they can cooperate with each other and stay unified there's no telling as to say that they are weaker than the United States well that is to say if the United States would let them be as strong as them

European Union is a sham lol

I'm actually really surprised that you're speaking so highly of it when it's the primary driver behind the migrant crisis

The EU is is a fucking joke

the EU is a house of cards, and it has been since it's inception

It was essentially the third German attempt to annex Europe, and they are on the tipping point of it currently

trying to put Greece and Germany on the same currency was a hilariously poor decision that they were warned of well in advance

So if I have you correct Beemann you're from the UK

nope, Leaf

about an hour from the Freedom Border

Well what the hell can you guys say to me that would prove that the EU is not sturdy the thing you is not strong tell me why it's a sham

Brexit comes to mind

The fact that they were allowed to have a state secede proves that it's more legitimate than the United States democracy if someone can vote out there out in the United States you can't have that

because it's multiple disparate economies with a singular currency, something economists told them was retarded. Because it's an undemocratic system that removes national sovereignty. Because it's incapable of taking care of its member states

The absurd amounts of money its spending on absolutely nothing

Source: Look at the fucking European Union today

I think the white race needs a little bit of non democracy I'm fine with a little bit of fascism

Personally I think we're a bit retarded

Asking how I know the EU is a sham is like asking how I know the car wrapped around a tree got in an accident

how does putting retards in power help with the retard problem?

The fact that Slavs, Germanics, Saxxons, Norse, and Mediterranean Hellenists have been at near constant war for 3000 years

Simple we need leaders and we have none

so a retarded leader is better than no leader? I have a political system to sell you, comrade

Again no more Brothers Wars

you cant just say "nuh uh" to the problem of european ethnic conflict though my dude

whats your model for eliminating it?

Well it seems that a bunch of fucking liberal pussies have lead us to the multiracial toilets that we all live in today those toilets are the reasons we're having the conversation we're having today. Perhaps if we can get some retard some fucking idiot stand up and say no nationhood is about defending people not open borders perhaps will be secure and Amalgamated as a people

Here comes the " no u"

border control and multiracial/multiethnic countries are not mutually exclusive

the problem you have is with Marxists my dude

Again I don't see a problem with race mixing its cultures and ideology that are the problem

I need to take a big boy time out, I'm fucking wasted. I'll catch up in the chat tomorrow.

alright

'later

Cool

See ya

take care

Piss Christ death Archer which fucking major countries in the world are leaders besides the United States that have single cultures and are successful

define success

Japan is dying, China is an authoritarian hole

The Koreas have had guns pointed at each other for 70 years

And in America is it the tyranny of people that makes us strong or is it capitalism that creates that tyranny

That makes us strong

Because I assure you there is no free market

No dude it's people lacking moral convictions and have no balls to stand up for what they believe in

America has been weakening itself with retarded world policing and removal of fundamental rights

or attempted removal at least, in most cases

And it is our fault for letting this corruption fester for so long

yup

Canada and Australia have the same issue without the same foundation

UK is already turning completely Orwellian

America was at its peak strength when we were at near homogenous levels of Europeans are decline has come as we increase our ethnic diversity and other great powers like China and Japan have risen as they increase their homogeneity

Not capitalism not our leadership its it is our fault

America was at peak strength when it still had a concrete value system it fought for

I think one of the problems with the UK is the fact that the crown has turned most of it's power over

and wasnt being undermind by retarded tribal politics

America = 1960

Exactly bee

And exactly when did America stop having its peak value system?

Around the point when the federal government decided it needed more state power, that freedom became secondary to safety, that surveillance of the citizenry trumped their privacy for political ideals

The answer is since 1965. We have a mass media system that lowers our value system to a low Point such that each different culture of people we allowed to immigrate here can accept it to a point that as a collection of different groups of people or threshold of value is so low that we are all just fucking DeGeneres

lolno, America was already slowly slipping prior to that

Nah

the effects of moral and cultural changes are seen after the fact

it's not an instantaneous shift

Again that is not founded in fact man show me the data and then I'll believe you

Diversity = degeneracy

Not you bee

diversity = genetic necessity lol

Ask Pakistan about that sometime :^)

Not true degenerate culture = degeneracy

Diversity equals degeneracy on a cultural level and the United States Implement that because it must be so an order so that our government can control us as a people.

Ask the Amish about that sometime, @Beemann

I respect the shit out of the Amish people cuz they keep to themselves and they don't try to push their culture on other people yet they have survived is it people. I come from Pennsylvania Amish Dutch Country so I understand them very well

your ideology seems to stem primarily from a consistent assertion that you havent done a whole lot to back

Again how that is not the case allowing people to live on equal terms does not lead to degeneracy

Beeman, what would you have me do?

yes, well the Amish are paying men big bucks to come seed their women because their community is running out of genetic diversity

Not calling people on there bullshit is what leads to degeneracy

No no no no no no the thing is when there is a indigenous native culture and you allow thousands and millions of foreigners to come and then you make all of them equal what you do is devalue a native culture and that's what is happening to White America

so does that mean whities get off native land reeeee? :^)

White America isn't an indigenous culture

Not by a long shot

The American system first applied this to Native Americans then they applied it to white Americans after they settled here and then now today we implement the same system on new natives we don't allow them to form their own told you they basically just have a super watered-down piece of shit culture that is just movies and television and bars

No no no White America is an indigenous culture of North America because we North America by force we basically Droid estimated killed all of the Native we effectively replace the natives with ourselves and if somebody wants to try the same thing for us I'm all for it

so then you're all for open borders :^)

No it's not you could European culture an indigenous culture but only in europe

Say euro*

Let me clean up that comment European Americans settle expanded colonized then Concord North America after we did that we implemented a genocide on the native effectively replacing the old natives with European people that is the reality of the world that we live in today. If no one can except that I'm sorry but you're living in a fantasy world

And even then, it's nearly impossible to trace the indigenous culture there, because all five major tribes of people have ruled that continent at one point or another

Concord = conquered