qotd

Discord ID: 588205956039442452


34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 73/140 | Next

2019-12-05 05:05:04 UTC

there is the, you are the all group and god is all group

2019-12-05 05:05:05 UTC

or the occasional "lol dumb"

2019-12-05 05:05:09 UTC

i am for the second

2019-12-05 05:05:50 UTC

```Histological, immunological and biochemiccal studies on the flesh and blood of the eucharistic miracle of Lanciano (8th century)```

2019-12-05 05:05:56 UTC

That's the name of the study

2019-12-05 05:07:21 UTC

do you have a link to it?

2019-12-05 05:07:23 UTC

im not finding it

2019-12-05 05:07:33 UTC

does this paper even exist?

2019-12-05 05:10:45 UTC

It's on pubmed

2019-12-05 05:10:52 UTC

Just Google it

2019-12-05 05:11:19 UTC

Copy and paste it

2019-12-05 05:11:32 UTC

It's on literally every site that hosts studies

2019-12-05 05:12:17 UTC

this is literally all i can see

2019-12-05 05:12:18 UTC

<:zoeyirl:517503257464274955>

2019-12-05 05:12:28 UTC

ive looked at like 100 sources and i can't find this paper on a single one

2019-12-05 05:14:04 UTC

Is this it?

2019-12-05 05:17:09 UTC

Addie has the right one

2019-12-05 05:17:47 UTC

From Quaderni Sclavo di diagnostica clinica e di laboratorio

2019-12-05 05:18:12 UTC

So i did more reaserch on this "miracle"

2019-12-05 05:18:30 UTC

Apparently it took place in 700 AD

2019-12-05 05:18:36 UTC

but the first mentions of it were in the 1600s

2019-12-05 05:18:48 UTC

which is pretty strange

2019-12-05 05:20:13 UTC

The first studies on it were in the 1600s

2019-12-05 05:20:41 UTC

But that's not the part of the miracle that we are trying to prove in a lab

2019-12-05 05:21:38 UTC

We have others that have eye witnesses and such too, but this specific miracle has lasted over a millenia, yet it's blood contents are those of someone who's blood is still beating, it's fresh.

2019-12-05 05:21:53 UTC

Despite being exposed to decomposition

2019-12-05 05:22:27 UTC

The flesh is real flesh, the blood type is that of the Shroud of Turin, aka a Jewish man

2019-12-05 05:24:24 UTC

The studies in the 1600s showed that the clots defied normal physics in that the larger ones were weighed the same as the smaller, if I remember correctly

2019-12-05 05:26:08 UTC

Similar miracles show that the white blood cell count remain fresh, which is impossible

2019-12-05 05:26:37 UTC

what the fuck? Did you say that its *beating* and defies physics?

2019-12-05 05:26:43 UTC

yea im calling bullshit

2019-12-05 05:31:44 UTC

I didn't

2019-12-05 05:32:03 UTC

I'm saying it has the blood composition of a heart that is still beating

2019-12-05 05:32:13 UTC

The heart itself is coagulated

2019-12-05 05:38:14 UTC

I don't see where you could have gotten confused in all of that

2019-12-05 05:42:24 UTC

this will sound stupid but how do i open it?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652021937375150101/Screen_Shot_2019-12-04_at_11.43.08_PM.png

2019-12-05 05:43:51 UTC

the shroud spectrum opened up fine but this one doesnt seem easy

2019-12-05 13:04:21 UTC

you probably have to sign in

2019-12-05 13:06:26 UTC

nvm you have to click send to

2019-12-05 14:15:54 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652151166095851530/Screen_Shot_2019-12-05_at_8.16.49_AM.png

2019-12-05 14:16:01 UTC

this is it/

2019-12-05 14:16:02 UTC

?

2019-12-05 15:37:17 UTC

the link is just a citation

2019-12-05 15:39:05 UTC

http://www.mediafire.com/file/2j2j8qalrmcrlb4/Lanciano_Article_16-45-35.pdf/file
that's a link to the study itself, though it's in italian

2019-12-05 17:09:00 UTC

i fell asleep

2019-12-05 17:09:26 UTC

anywho, there is very little on this guy and his "research". So far the only mentions i can find of him are on catholics websites

2019-12-05 17:09:36 UTC

and it doesnt seem like his research was even peer reviewed

2019-12-05 17:09:45 UTC

so i'm pretty confident in dismissing it

2019-12-05 17:10:49 UTC

btw, Im pretty sure the "shroud of turin" blood test was fraudulent

2019-12-05 17:11:26 UTC

The evidence against the shroud vastly outweights the evidence for its authenticity

2019-12-05 17:11:54 UTC

Even if it were an actual burial cloth from the time of Jesus, there is no way to confirm that it actually *belonged* to Jesus

2019-12-05 17:12:09 UTC

But here is the crazy part

2019-12-05 17:12:23 UTC

Even if I were to agree that it belonged to Jesus, it *still doesnt mean he is the son of God

2019-12-05 17:13:12 UTC

(i bring this up because Eoppa said the blood type of the mystery meat matched the blood found on the shroud of turin)

2019-12-05 17:32:11 UTC

@Riley what do you think about the theory that jesus actually lived in 1000ad

2019-12-05 17:39:50 UTC

i think u r gay and u suck on pee pee and eat poo poo

2019-12-05 18:03:32 UTC

Fuck

2019-12-05 18:03:37 UTC

Why is the nword banned

2019-12-05 18:03:49 UTC

@Riley at least I'm not a tranny

2019-12-05 18:14:32 UTC

<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

2019-12-05 18:14:35 UTC

ok poopoo eater

2019-12-05 20:41:58 UTC

@everyone Daily Question ๐Ÿ”–

**-** What should the income tax be for the rich, middle class, poor, and ultra rich? Or are you in favor of flat tax - if progressive tax how steep should the slope be?

2019-12-05 20:42:07 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652248360190869527/image0-287.png

2019-12-05 20:42:09 UTC

Negative income tax

2019-12-05 20:42:11 UTC

Nuff said

2019-12-05 20:42:15 UTC

Remove income tax

2019-12-05 20:42:26 UTC

Replace it with high tariffs

2019-12-05 20:42:28 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652248451299672074/image0-643-5.png

2019-12-05 20:42:36 UTC

^

2019-12-05 20:43:40 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652248751620096035/image0.gif

2019-12-05 20:44:02 UTC

flexible tax; tax professions differently e.g. farmers get a tax reduction, decrease taxes for the middle class and poor and increase the tax rate onto the top 10%, 1% and 1/10% respectively

2019-12-05 20:44:18 UTC

if the economy was reset, a 10% flat rate tax on all commercial trades would be more than enough to sustain the economy. Income tax is bad as it penalizes the poorer population for being poor and the rich benefit since they don't lose as much.

2019-12-05 20:44:21 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652248921673826304/image-1-1.gif

2019-12-05 20:44:40 UTC

<:ben:588490784576110593>

2019-12-05 20:44:45 UTC

Change my mind

2019-12-05 20:44:52 UTC

White women started the mafia

2019-12-05 20:45:03 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/652249097843245092/image0-209.png

2019-12-05 20:46:10 UTC

Also 100% tax on income that exceeds 10 million for every dollar after 10 million

2019-12-05 20:46:35 UTC

some kind of wealth cap would be preferable

2019-12-05 20:48:04 UTC

Also farmers, loggers etc get a tax reduction, aswell as other vital first and secondary jobs such as energy sector jobs that require manual labor

2019-12-05 20:48:43 UTC

yeh the tax system should steer the country towards autarky

2019-12-05 20:49:48 UTC

Is that a bad thing? Frankly free trade has only hurt the bottom half, we need to be more self sufficient and incentivize our jobs at home

2019-12-05 20:50:12 UTC

Also decreases our foreign debt rate

2019-12-05 20:51:30 UTC

autarky is a good thing, free trade has failed to deliver what it promised

2019-12-05 20:52:45 UTC

90% marginal tax rate

2019-12-05 20:52:54 UTC

For highest wage earners

2019-12-05 20:53:14 UTC

U.S has 90% marginal tax rate for top wage earners in the 40's and 50's

2019-12-05 20:53:25 UTC

Tariffs>income tax

2019-12-05 20:53:28 UTC

100% flat tax

2019-12-05 20:53:31 UTC

The rich rely on free trade

2019-12-05 20:54:08 UTC

Also eliminate VAT taxes

2019-12-05 20:54:26 UTC

They negatively effect the poor and middle class

2019-12-05 20:56:21 UTC

Tax on petrol aswell get rid of, only hurts the poor, however incentivize carbon free energy subsidies and phase out carbon fuels in a decade or so

2019-12-05 20:57:15 UTC

Tax on the top 1% and 1/10 will pay for these tax reductions

2019-12-05 20:58:45 UTC

Also tax on stock speculation and bonds would help to cover for welfare programs

2019-12-05 21:00:50 UTC

Id rather ban AI in wallstreet than put a tax on every single transaction in the market

2019-12-05 21:17:06 UTC

The rich should be abolished

2019-12-05 21:30:48 UTC

Eat the rich

2019-12-05 21:54:52 UTC

eat the rich jews

2019-12-05 22:56:52 UTC

Or just the rich in general.

2019-12-05 22:57:04 UTC

**especially landlords**

2019-12-06 00:40:58 UTC

@Riley it was peer reviewed, and you completely ignore what I claim the lab was testing about the miracle

2019-12-06 00:59:10 UTC

idk, you would think something like this would have a lot more attention lol

2019-12-06 00:59:17 UTC

im super skeptical

2019-12-06 01:11:57 UTC

It did

2019-12-06 01:12:01 UTC

These happen all the time

2019-12-06 01:12:15 UTC

We have plenty of verified miracles

2019-12-06 01:12:36 UTC

The Egyptian government (who isn't even Christian) literally recognizes the Zeitoun apparition

2019-12-06 01:12:42 UTC

Which we have photos of

2019-12-06 03:16:30 UTC

Nasser himself reportedly saw it

2019-12-06 03:16:39 UTC

And he was as secular as they come

2019-12-07 15:52:41 UTC

Hm

2019-12-07 23:18:57 UTC

@everyone Daily Question ๐Ÿ”–

- How should education be controlled? Should it be only national standards, state standards, localized standards, a mix, privatized, chartered, etc etc. Include your view on vouchers

2019-12-07 23:20:08 UTC

Remove private subsidies of the school system

2019-12-07 23:20:15 UTC

And increase spending

2019-12-07 23:20:20 UTC

it should be run on state standards, however the federal government should have significant control over the curriculum.

2019-12-07 23:21:48 UTC

Nationalize standards, nationalize powerful private education institutions like College Board and ACT

2019-12-07 23:31:25 UTC

National standard, while I am usually a fan of state autonomy when it comes to education from what Iโ€™ve seen it usually leads to disaster.
Privatized schools can have a place but they should be under strict state supervision and need to certify that they are not falling under the state standard

2019-12-07 23:36:22 UTC

Combination of National State Local. Primarily public with private school options not funded by the government.

2019-12-07 23:52:16 UTC

I need to learn more on how any of these work and what are the pros and cons from each kind. Thus I'm uncertain.

2019-12-07 23:52:51 UTC

I also need to know what exactly is common core and why was that bad.

2019-12-07 23:53:59 UTC

Educational reform on compulsory education while also creating a unified national
framework, national standards, core curriculum, and guidelines for schools to follow, will give
success and prosperity for the nation. Schools nationwide will now be directly controlled by the
federal state no longer allowing for slight regional differences in educational approach. I wish for a
more classical education system of Trivium & Quadrivium expanding to practical skills in high
school (shop class, auto repair, home-ec, etc). Mandatory Phys Ed based on fitness training
then mandatory extracurricular exercise after school (sports, boxing, etc). A higher starting
salary for Teachers at $55,000. Teachers should also wear a uniform like any other public
servant. Decorations of academic achievements should illuminate their chest as a visual display
of a teacher's services. Teachers should receive raises or pay deductions based on the
performance of student academic achievements. Homeschooling and parochial schools will be
allowed for families and communities that desire to educate their children in that manner. A propose a complete overhaul of the entire education system controlled by the Federal state so an
emphasis on history, national identity, and comradeship that the national community provides. The old college system will be dismantled completely for we want higher affordable education
thus we will implement a new national system of affordable higher education based on the guild
system providing low-cost vocational education, trade schools, specialized colleges including
domestic industry and manufacturing trade schools creating low-cost higher education. Forgive all current student debt.

2019-12-08 00:01:00 UTC

@Zoltanous What was wrong with the states controlling education? Wouldn't that lead to less teaching of the state's history and erosion of state and local cultures?

2019-12-08 00:09:05 UTC

I don't like the regional state system. I despise republicanism, democracy and any type of liberalism. The state system ensures a culturally, histrically and identity that is not fundamentally unitary. A nation is only a nation when it fully fits these while America has never done so.

2019-12-08 00:43:01 UTC

@Zoltanous A monarchy was relatively decentralized that local regional cultures throve. It's possible to have a decentralized state without a republican government.

2019-12-08 02:20:42 UTC

Dont care

2019-12-08 02:20:52 UTC

Still wont pay my taxes

2019-12-08 03:01:03 UTC

Or, an easier solution here that requires less typing

2019-12-08 03:01:24 UTC

Just remove all education requirements, have you raise your kid as you see fit

2019-12-08 03:01:37 UTC

he can go on to places of education later on if he needs to

2019-12-08 05:09:45 UTC

@Louis XIV (aka 1685Violin) depends, feudal monarchy was decentralized, absolutism was not and neither was fascism. I'm not interested in Liberalism or the feudal order. I'm interested in Empire, absolutist ontology and metamodernism

2019-12-08 05:28:31 UTC

This dude has it

2019-12-08 08:57:18 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/653158149943197696/hello_based.mp4

2019-12-09 01:31:11 UTC

@everyone Daily Question ๐Ÿ”–

- It has become clear that the House will be moving on to official Impeachment of President Trump. What do you believe the results of the ensuing senatorial trial will be? How long do you believe it will take to conclude? Is there a possibility that President Trump lies under oath?

2019-12-09 01:31:41 UTC

I honestly donโ€™t care about any of it

2019-12-09 01:31:50 UTC

the senate is republican dominated, love him or hate him, hes going nowhere

Infighting between globalists, I couldn't care less.

2019-12-09 01:32:07 UTC

**american hour bitches**

2019-12-09 01:32:09 UTC

Bro who the fuck cares

2019-12-09 01:32:18 UTC

Its gay normie politics

2019-12-09 01:32:19 UTC

it will never happen under the senete so why do democrats bother.

2019-12-09 01:32:21 UTC

I wish he was impeached but the senate wont allow it

2019-12-09 01:32:24 UTC

Pelosi's an old hag, anyway.

2019-12-09 01:32:35 UTC

But ya know

2019-12-09 01:32:41 UTC

I say we impeach them all

2019-12-09 01:33:03 UTC

A wise man once said "if we cant vote them out, we must shoot them out. It's our constitutional right, stated in the constitution"

2019-12-09 01:33:07 UTC

^

2019-12-09 01:33:15 UTC

american politics went to shit when john mccain left

2019-12-09 01:33:44 UTC

it was shit after 1963 my man

2019-12-09 01:34:16 UTC

America died with the civil war

Try anytime before the 20th century.

2019-12-09 01:34:45 UTC

america went to shit when we won the war of 1812

America went to shit with the Revolution.

2019-12-09 01:37:02 UTC

America went to shit when the Europeans stepped foot on it

scratch that, with the end of Salutory Neglect

lol no it went to shit when it broke from pangea

2019-12-09 01:37:57 UTC
2019-12-09 01:38:00 UTC

Lol.

2019-12-09 01:38:49 UTC

smh, no good neo cons have come around ever since john mccain died (rip king)

2019-12-09 01:38:57 UTC

who's gonna lobby for bombing iran now?

2019-12-09 01:39:00 UTC

>neoconservatism

2019-12-09 01:39:17 UTC

it should die off with the boomers

2019-12-09 01:39:20 UTC

Iโ€™ll do it if nobody else will. @901

2019-12-09 01:40:27 UTC

does anyone actually give a shit about the impeachment hearings? It just feels like such a waste of time

2019-12-09 01:40:45 UTC

I do. Wouldnโ€™t have asked the question otherwise. @Deli.v2

2019-12-09 01:41:29 UTC

Mostly because I see it as a potential way to determine if the partisanship of the GOP has gone too far.

2019-12-09 01:53:39 UTC

@DrRisen Asking a foreign leader to investigate an American commiting crimes in America using a foreign nation is not impeachable

2019-12-09 01:55:31 UTC

@Maksim Would you agree that an investigation by a foreign power into Biden could be beneficial to Trumpโ€™s election campaign?

2019-12-09 01:55:35 UTC

Biden gave foreign aid money to Ukraine, but he didnt, he gave it to the largest bank in Ukraine, owned by the same person who owned a oil and gas company which Bidens son was on the board of directors on even tho he has no experience with oil or gas

2019-12-09 01:55:53 UTC

@DrRisen That is utterly and completely irrelevant

2019-12-09 01:56:04 UTC

Humor me.

2019-12-09 01:56:06 UTC

You can not ignore Bidens crimes

2019-12-09 01:56:23 UTC

I mean his son is a tried-and-true piece of shit.

2019-12-09 01:56:27 UTC

The partisanship of the Dems has gone too far

2019-12-09 01:56:30 UTC

It is unacceptable

2019-12-09 01:56:34 UTC

He flunked out as an LDO in the US Navy because he tested positive for cocaine.

2019-12-09 01:56:55 UTC

Well, so much for having a conversation.

2019-12-09 01:57:11 UTC

Ukraine has missed out on billions of foreign aid money because Biden funneled money thru a bamk and gas company back to his son and himself @DrRisen

2019-12-09 01:57:17 UTC

I think you can understand why I hate Biden

2019-12-09 01:57:43 UTC

The Dems are unbelievably partisan

2019-12-09 01:57:44 UTC

I absolutely understand why you would hate the man, but my question remains.

2019-12-09 01:58:05 UTC

The question is ingenious

2019-12-09 01:58:08 UTC

As I asked, just humor me.

2019-12-09 01:58:12 UTC

No

2019-12-09 01:58:17 UTC

The question is disingenious

2019-12-09 01:58:25 UTC

Ignores heaps of context and information

2019-12-09 01:58:48 UTC

@DrRisen I can pitch my thoughts in.

2019-12-09 01:59:04 UTC

Regarding your campaign question.

2019-12-09 01:59:27 UTC

Ingenious. That word, you keep using it. I do not think it means what you think t means.

2019-12-09 01:59:38 UTC

@Enkrum Go ahead.

2019-12-09 01:59:39 UTC

Disingenious

2019-12-09 01:59:41 UTC

I fixed it

2019-12-09 01:59:44 UTC

Kk.

2019-12-09 02:00:26 UTC

I'd make a deal to inpeach Trump if Biden and his son and all those involved in this as also put behind bars

2019-12-09 02:00:38 UTC

@Maksim I can assure you I am being sincere, but if you donโ€™t believe so then thereโ€™s not much of a point in conversing with me is there.

2019-12-09 02:01:08 UTC

I believe that if the investigation came to ultimately nothing or became a deadlock before the elections, it could definitely be used as leverage against the incumbent Democratic Party within the US government.

Specifically, Trump, and not just him, can use it as a catalyst to influence public opinion that the Democrats have led a four year-long investigation, with so much money, so much time, and so much effort, that has provided no proof nor any feasible results. It can most certainly be used as a political weapon for the upcoming elections.

2019-12-09 02:01:48 UTC

@DrRisen I don't see the point in talking with you if you don't agree Biden and his son, along with all those involved are also criminally guilty and should be put behind bars

2019-12-09 02:02:37 UTC

I do not know the specifics of the Ukraine situation, so this is a general hypothetical of mine on how things could potentially go.

2019-12-09 02:03:05 UTC

@Maksim I donโ€™t know. They could be. That said, you know Iโ€™m an innocent until proven guilty kind of guy. More to the point though, you asked if the action was impeachable, not if Biden did something highly illegal.

2019-12-09 02:03:43 UTC

@Enkrum So you would in short agree it has the potential to be beneficial for Trump, yes?

2019-12-09 02:03:47 UTC

Yes.

2019-12-09 02:03:56 UTC

It all depends on how itโ€™s framed by him.

2019-12-09 02:04:12 UTC

@DrRisen Is it impeachable?

2019-12-09 02:04:39 UTC

To ask a foreign leader to Investigate a crime committed by an American in America using a foreign countries aid money?

2019-12-09 02:05:07 UTC

For me, I couldn't really give a shit

2019-12-09 02:05:12 UTC

I think pence would be better anyways

2019-12-09 02:05:14 UTC

@Maksim If you agree with @Enkrum it would be a conflict of interest, which makes an investigation justifiable because of FEC laws.

2019-12-09 02:05:33 UTC

This one in particular.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/653416917570289724/image0.png

2019-12-09 02:05:59 UTC

Biden literally violated this but ok ignore that

2019-12-09 02:06:34 UTC

I disagree it's a conflict of interest, because there is no evidence

2019-12-09 02:06:43 UTC

All you are doing is drawing imaginary connections

2019-12-09 02:06:47 UTC

No tangible proof

2019-12-09 02:06:56 UTC

Zelensky himself denied quid pro quo

2019-12-09 02:07:42 UTC

A conflict of interest isnโ€™t evidence based, its context based. The presence of a motive so to speak.

2019-12-09 02:07:57 UTC

Conflict of interest is evidence based in court

2019-12-09 02:08:15 UTC

Context can be interpreted to fit whatever narrative you want

2019-12-09 02:08:17 UTC

It is unreliable

2019-12-09 02:08:47 UTC

Itโ€™s evidence at minimum to warrant an investigation into if the possibility of malpractice holds any water.

2019-12-09 02:09:15 UTC

I don't really care about the investigation

2019-12-09 02:09:16 UTC

And that is what impeachment would cause, an investigation into the matter.

2019-12-09 02:09:21 UTC

I don't care if he gets impeached

2019-12-09 02:09:25 UTC

I want to see Biden locked up

2019-12-09 02:09:39 UTC

Pence would be better anyways

2019-12-09 02:10:01 UTC

This here is the only thing Iโ€™m attempting to address.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/588205956039442452/653418044709928991/image0.png

2019-12-09 02:10:19 UTC

If the bidens used US aid dollars and gave it to Ukranian banks to make them rich-while in office-that seems criminal

2019-12-09 02:10:34 UTC

If you want to talk about motive, look at how pelosi said she wanted to inpeach Trump *and pence, that is motive

2019-12-09 02:10:42 UTC

Because she would be next in line for the presidency

2019-12-09 02:10:55 UTC

As per the line of succession

2019-12-09 02:11:31 UTC

@Shalopy Biden gave foreign aid money to Ukraine, but he didnt, he gave it to the largest bank in Ukraine, owned by the same person who owned a oil and gas company which Bidens son was on the board of directors on even tho he has no experience with oil or gas

2019-12-09 02:11:34 UTC

Has she said anything about Pence?

2019-12-09 02:11:39 UTC
2019-12-09 02:11:59 UTC

And does such an action violate FEC laws?

2019-12-09 02:12:52 UTC

I haven't read FEC laws

2019-12-09 02:12:56 UTC

I would assume so

2019-12-09 02:12:59 UTC

Conflict of interest

2019-12-09 02:13:16 UTC

"Foreign aid" as in govt expenditures for self-enrichment. Not sure if that would fall under FEC or not

2019-12-09 02:13:19 UTC

Conflict of interest isnโ€™t inherently illegal.

2019-12-09 02:13:21 UTC

It might

2019-12-09 02:13:28 UTC

Itโ€™s when one of the two interests is illegal.

2019-12-09 02:13:29 UTC

@DrRisen there you go then

2019-12-09 02:13:31 UTC

It's illegal

2019-12-09 02:14:01 UTC

Pelosi and Dems want to inpeach Trump and pence so that pelosi becomes president

2019-12-09 02:14:08 UTC

Doing things for self financial benefit is basically illegal

2019-12-09 02:14:09 UTC

...

2019-12-09 02:14:19 UTC

The partisanship of the Dems is

2019-12-09 02:14:21 UTC

Unbelievable

34,778 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 73/140 | Next