☭ ⊕ Korovsky ⊕ ☭ (Discord ID: 549852235136368660), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
186 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
It's not really a problem of who can vote but how.
Representative democracy doesn't do a good job at keeping its voter base informed, and the media deliberately keeps it this way
Party politics and the media circus drummed up at election time aids in voters turning it into nothing more than a sportsball game where they just want "their" party to win no matter how shit they are.
In effect, the multiple party system is a sham.
Anybody who is seriously working outside of the two parties in the real world knows this. You can explain every aspect of your policy and get somebody to agree but they still won't vote for you because they've got some Game of Thrones blood oath to their party "because my dad voted for them, and so did his dad and I'm gonna uphold the tradition" or whatever the fuck.
It should be a one-party system where individuals vote according to the field they work in (agriculture, industry, etc.) which exists to advise the government how best to proceed on certain policies. That's the only way I can plausibly see informed votes happening.
Another reason why I wish the revolution would be televised
no gods, no masters, except for my landlord
Combination of cultural warfare, the sanctity of marriage and a lot of rope, some assembly required
I don't know if you would count this as a book of an explicitly political nature in the same vein as other ideological works
But *The Impeachment of Man* is perhaps one of the best books I've ever read.
Essentially it's a manifesto of Deep Ecology, if you want to call it that.
Some might call it that, though I believe that any person who is seriously concerned with nature in general can learn from it even if they do not explicitly identify as a Fascist.
The government is definitely not going to use it to make everybody outside of their cliche extremely stupid.
That would be an abuse of their power and they've never been known for that before.
You cannot be a Capitalist and a Nationalist is my stance.
@Attika i must have Alzheimer's cause ion remember asking
From the point of view that 'good' is to be interpreted as the 'common good' as opposed to individual good.
A certain policy might be 'good' for a select few individuals, but not for the majority of citizens who have to live with its results.
Old morals are good but they should be implemented into a futurist framework.
The industrial revolution and its consequences.....
'Progress' is as subjective as 'good.'
If we're to believe that there is no such objective thing as 'good', then 'progress' is just as moot a talking point.
Ok loser <:shoot:591451983647473707>
🖕🏻 dont care didnt ask plus youre a monarchist 🖕🏻
A good authoritarian government is one that can afford to remain largely unintrusive in people's private lives
Porn would go through a slow phase of being uprooted imo
Being socially shunned like smoking is, and then gradually banned
Could just set a bar for what 'dissent' is. Like for me, disagreement with certain small policy is not the same as outright sedition
The only way you could be an enemy of the state is if you are either a Capitalist or anti-White
Unless you're like a CEO or some shit
Freedom isn't gay, it's just been turned into an overused buzzword that's been boiled down to "if I can't choose wrong, you're oppressing me"
The Trotskyists in my city support HK
He should've finished what Hitler didn't start but should have
Third World should've listened to Gadaffi
Depends on the totalitarian regime. If it is moral and fair, then I have no problem with it.
The depressed announcer voice on the train is my aesthetic.
Western Civilization began to decline when it disobeyed the law of God.
Public/State ownership and control of the means of production; cooperative business is allowed to exist
Heavy environmental protections
Minimal taxation - ideally *none* but that is perhaps unrealistic
State-subsidized culture fund
This post was made by Christbol gang
Muslims are cool, they just don't belong in the West
Atheism is for fags, hippies and nihilists
"bro what's 2 + 2, but don't answer with any of that '4' stuff"
Because Aquinas had studied like centuries of literature and dogma??
he's a theologian so it counts as a source
okay then we're arguing from a subjective standpoint; even if somebody *can* prove that god exists, you can just go "well it doesn't look like proof to me"
okay well run through with me, what were your critiques?
okay so number one of the first way, our senses prove that some things are in motion
number two, things move when potential motion becomes actual motion,
number three, only an actual motion can convert a potential motion into an actual motion.
number four, nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality in the same respect.
i.e: if both actual and potential, it is actual in one respect and potential in another.
number five, nothing can move itself
number six, each thing in motion is moved by something else
number seven, the sequence of motion cannot extend *ad infinitum*
it is therefore necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other, and this everybody understand to be God
okay but we have to deduce that there had to be a beginning point, having had no objections prior to point eight, right?
okay, so the thing is that whatever you replace with God as the beginning point
has to logically exist outside of Time itself
since Time is also a factor that is in motion
can you soundly demonstrate that at all?
okay so what alternatives would there plausibly be?
if not a thing/being that exists outside of time
no, which is where we go into the next point
well perfect is defined as having all desired or required qualities, characteristics and elements - as good as it is possible to be
but i'm a bit puzzled here, you said you disagreed on a lot of things
it's a bit of a copout to try and disprove via laws that he created; you would have to conclude that somebody who is *outside* of these laws is not beholden to them
since he himself defines what they are
i would say that the opposite is true actually
contradictions within laws he exists outside of though, that's the problem here
you're arguing within boundaries that he exists outside of
i'm not understanding how you reach that conclusion though
if it is purely applicable to our world, and he exists outside of that world
how is it applicable to him therefore?
for arguments sake, if he chose for it to exist then it very well could
but the reason why it doesnt is because he has not ordained the law to behave in such a way
again, we're trying to make arguments within boundaries he is not beholden to
if he wanted a square circle to exist, he very well could have chosen to do so
that's a bit of a silly question, don't you think?
it's like asking why he invented mathematics
it would be just like saying 'god lets me ask if 1 + 1 can equal 5 so therefore he can't be perfect'
@ilovemyself AWD would be more useful if it *had* a party
but there isn't anything particular wrong with it in principle
and i'm not trying to sound like an elitist or a snob or anything like that
you wouldn't have them in charge of actual important national policies if they did happen to take power
Outlaw all other parties, make the militant wing of the party and the armed forces synonymous, term limit of ten years per head of state unless a vote of extension is cast
@Spergerger basically the Sith party then
Infighting between globalists, I couldn't care less.
Try anytime before the 20th century.
<:absoluteretardation:591182455885660178> you rn
SIEGE is maybe good for the US. Literally useless almost everywhere else.
Hitler was okay but he didn't go far enough.
That counts as something he did wrong.
@Otto Could've taken the nuclear option.
Oh well, the entire world is Jewish now.
I probably wouldn't say by 2021. Shit will definitely go sour within the decade though.
I can't remember how much debt the US has to rack up but like
Basically it's when they can't even *service* the debt.
That's when you'll see things start to move along.
First the class war then the race war 😤
Anti-White rhetoric should be under severe scrutiny in European nations
If Trump stays, woo, more support for Israel and gun rights stripped away
If he goes, who is going to replace him?
Lose-lose situation, it's just theatre to distract us.
Medicare works wonderfully in Australia. If you proposed privatizing it, you'd get politically crucified.
That doesn't explain how it's slavery though.
Even assuming what you said was true.
I'm shocked you won't provide me a reason as to how it's slavery.
Not really. Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's.
You haven't established a premise as to how it's slavery.
If you can't understand that what you're describing isn't even slavery, I'm not sure I even want to have a discussion.
So you're aware, you need to be 13+ to use Discord.
Private healthcare is stupidly worse.
The US has a worse healthcare system than Saudi Arabia.
The worship of money is the root of all evil.
186 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.