Is anyone here familiar with the Artificial Amazon theory

essentially, the dirt in the Amazon region is of a type known as "terra preta", a very fertile black soil

other regions like pennsylvania or ukraine have natural fertile black soils but terra preta is found to have pottery shards, shards of bone from animals consumed by humans, ashes made by unnatural fires

much of the soil is compost, basically. not to say that the Amazon is completely fake, but much of it is artificial

yup

Hello

So, one of the reasons I can't believe in a flat earth is that it doesn't work with plate tectonics

if we're a disk flying upwards through space, either the disk has a molten core driving the processes, in which case, why doesn't the magma melt its way down and fall out of the world?, or tectonic processes are a hoax, which, the globalists or whomever's to blame would have to had planted not just the fossils, but *all* the rocks and soils known to geology

unless there's a flat earther theory of geological processes, in which case, I'd be very interested

flat earth also doesn't account for gravitational anomalies. Certain regions of the earth do have slightly higher and slightly lower gravities and a flat plane/disk flying upwards doesn't account for that.

Finally, I've been to the observation deck of the new WTC and I've seen the curve. Now, if the window's a subtle fish-eye lens, the other buildings ought to be slightly distorted too, but they're not. If it's a screen, well, I've seen flecks of windblown dust on the glass so that must be a hella advanced screen. At that cost, why would they go through the trouble in the first place?

Gravity pulls objects to the center of mass so a gravitational flat earth would result in diagonal directions of fall for people towards the edges

it would have to be to have gravity on a flat earth

in which case, there wouldn't be volcanic activity in the arctic circle, which there is.

ralk?

Yes, with a donut core

but then there'd be no volcanic activity in the arctic, as it wouldn't have any core under it

and we've directly seen the effects of arctic volcanism, for example, the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in 2010, so that can't be true.

lol ikr

yeah, it's a disk flying upwards, supposed to be

which doesn't explain slightly different fall speeds in diff areas which gravity does explain, or geology, or how the earth retains a core

I think that was a mockumentary vitmar

actually yeah it was, I know what you're talking about

bruh, it showed world governments doing public picking of the best passengers and the building of a massive generation ship, are any of those happening rn lol

yup

yup.

Bruh that's a map made by a redditor, it's not a well-thought-out prediction of the future

also the tidepod thing was astroturfed, really only like 700 people have actually been confirmed by medical reports to have eaten tide pods and needed serious medical help

also I support the green new deal
irregardless of what you think of climate change, it includes provisions for the fixing of infrastructure, transitions to renewable energy, stuff like that, which'd be good to do anyway and create lots of jobs.

Especially when our dependence on oil benefits the Saudis and international capital the way it does

Dems hate the GND because Dems are controlled by capital

as we all know

gov agency jobs don't enrich them, so they don't want it

a *faction of the democrats hate aoc

She better

people have gotten sick of neoliberalism, it's why clintin lost

like it or not, socialism has invigorated the left

people are more involved then ever

bruh private business is not going to improve anything if it's not profitable

"buy a tesla" c'mon

No, misconception

it wouldn't ban gas cars, it would ban the manufacture of new ones after 2030

So you didn;t read it.

Bruh what you just said shows you didn't actuall read the GND

anyway this is getting too heated so I'm gonna duck out

the world ran on sail for hundreds of years. So?

You're being quite rude tbh

I didn't come here to fight with anybody so I'd appreciate not getting called a weakling and getting told to leave

Ane nobody thinks that

yes I know it's a joke lol

it just degrades the quality of the conversation is all.

>impact font

Bruh that's a summary of the GND not the GND

we all know that the media lies so why would you trustem on this

Also you conveniently ignore the fact that this isn't meant to make any of this happen instantly, nobody's coming to steal your car

"completely replace" by 2030

lel

not next week, 11 years. or longer, it's only a framework for these ideas, not set in stone

oh here we go w/ the 70% thing

that's a *marginal* tax rate, that means for the top

in the eisenhower era, they were 90%, this is relatively merciful compared to a *conservative*

let's see your source?

Source? send the tweet or the article pls

otherwise, can't take you at your word

"X said" is not an argument. You need sources.

Who verified you? The mods?

Appeals to authority are inherently against the spirit of the conspiracy community

Theorists figure things out for ourselves, we don't just trust people because we're told to.

so idc if you're "verified" tbh

A senator made fun of something, therefore it's bad

yeah, sure. lol

not an argument.

Bruh taking the time to make a meme doesnt make it right

I could take the time to make a meme that birds are made of jello, doesn't make it true

so you're saying he's trustworthy because he's a senator doing that? what happened to skeptiscism?

when one only sees news about her that's calling her stupid, course one thinks she's stupid

what you have to do with a new political figure or ideology is go in expecting nothing and form opinions after hearing them out

idk why if you make a claim in here it's ok but if I disagree I need to go to civil debate and not you, but ok

lol

why don't you name one thing she said that is?

why is the burden of proof only on me?

so the burden of proof is only on me, you're just right by default, got it

bruh there are different definitions of words, a word doesn't mean one thing and only one

I am going into Linguistics so I would know.

Bruh I mean that I am studying it professionally

unless linguistics is a commie plot too? ok

You can't declare yourself the winner, that's not how this works lol

wait so I can't say my points now? k

nah I don't claim to be the victim

I just think dishonest tactics have been used
anyway thanks for the "civil debate", gotta duck out for the night

yeah whatever you think lol

bruh you're literally the one declaring yourself a winner and touting your verfied role

What did Nils do?

He didn't break the rules?

So you didn't like what he had to say

so he's being punished?

K that tells me all I need to know, bye

this is a public channel that everybody can type in

c'mon

anyway you're a power-drunk, ad-hominem-using, easily offended jackass, anybody who reads this channel'll see that you've already defeated yourself, so I suppose I'm done here, seeya