how would cutting the head of a dick off be not as bad as FGM

shitjitsu = brainlet

the dick wouldnt work

I’m said that’s when it would be equal

no you said it would not be worse

Yeah women

As in fgm wouldn’t be worse if that were the case

we need a #dickdebate channel

lmao

@shinjitsu
Female circumcision is also defined DOWN to nicking or cutting the clitoral hood, the LITERAL analogue of male circumcision.

Do people really find female soldiers as a badass thing. Am i the only one thinking its a joke to see

Yeah but people aren’t talking about nicking the clitoral hood

@scorch no

If that’s all you’re talking about then sure you’re right it’s not worse

If you’re talking entire removal of the clitoris then that’s worse than snip snip on foreskin

#changemymind

Btw I am anti circumcision

@shinjitsu
That is the MAJORITY them! Infibulation is only a tiny fraction! And clitoredecromy removes only TINY distal bit of the clitoris.

Okay fine then I didn’t know that but when people hear it, that’s not what they think is meant by fgm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suLJJplFSQU listen to this, patrick little is much more intelligent and viable than Nehlen

fellas do we really expect muzzies to do it scientifically

People who knee-jerk say "FGM is worse" are operating on feminist horror propaganda.

he quotes lots of facts and stats and historical events

Wrong. Most people understand fgm to be a literal removal of the clitoris

Which I guess you could say in a roundabout way may be feminist horror propaganda but it’s a bit of a stretch

More like Israeli anti Muslim propaganda

time to start putting people to death for circumcision

An uncircumcised man tends to have more confidence than his circumcised counterpart, controlling for all other factors of course

Where is that research

the virgin doubter

He says “controlling for other factors” as if there is research on this, so I’m simply saying show me the research

It is true that intact men are happier with their status than any other group. Men circumcised in infancy had the least satisfaction.

Uncircumcised men tend to be longer and wider as well

Any research noble?

Indeed

I have at least seen Greg back what he says up

Plenty of peer reviewed research h

Link one paper

circumsicse this

@NobleManWithABigHeart
A 1995 Australian condom sizing study found that circumcision in infancy reduces both true girth (intuitively) and (rather surprisingly) length of the adult penis.

The Bossio study inadvertently admitted that intact men are the happiest cohort.

WTF

Where is this Australia study I can’t find t

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/999355619390865408
Elongated Muskrat is goin Hamtaro

BATTLEFIELD 5 CUCKED

@Gregory Malchuk Plenty Of evidence out there

not surprised Coming from DICE, DICE is a Swedish company

They're all cucked

Exclusive Preorder character : Gimp Bitch

all of EA is run by fanatic progressives and feminists

out and open

@NobleManWithABigHeart
Indeed. But at the end of the day, I don't need a damn study to justify male human rights to physical integrity.

@Gregory Malchuk “This study indicates that neonatal circumcision is not associated with changes in penile sensitivity and provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the foreskin is not the most sensitive part of the penis.”

Literally from Bossio

Even anecdotally I’ve know uncircumcised men to carry themselves with an aura that is largely absent in their circumcised counterparts

@NobleManWithABigHeart HAHA WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN?

@shinjitsu
That is one of the Bossio studies that tested sensitivity, not the one I am talking about. And they only probed the OUTSIDE of the foreskin, which is laughable.

Lolololololololololol

"an aura that is largely absent" can we have a faggot-to-english translation please

@Barry N. Terdastein Basically a level of confidence and even, dare I say it, nobility that you just don’t find in the average post circ

Ok you lost me there

"protocols assessed touch and pain thresholds and warmth detection and heat pain thresholds at a control site (forearm) and three to four penile sites (glans penis, midline shaft, proximal to midline shaft,** and foreskin**, if present)." @Gregory Malchuk

@NobleManWithABigHeart
So
A: they were more chad than u
B: And you saw their dick?

wrong

foreskin was tested in that exact study

@shinjitsu
They were probing the outside. I have a forekskin right here. You want me to probe mine right now?

What do you mean 'the outside'

@NobleManWithABigHeart
Sounds like youre admiring Bulls too much

as in not pulling back

?

@shinjitsu
The foreskin retracts. The inside is an extremely soft and sensitive mucous membrane.

Fucking Boomer

So you're saying the testing was done without pulling back the foreskin and doing the testing underneath?

and fortgay ruins Battlefield

NO COUNTERSIGNALING FORTNITE

@shinjitsu
Suppisedly. Sorrells et. al made an attempt to measure these regions and found them quite sensitive.

@Barry N. Terdastein It’s simple sociology. I can basically identify pre circs and post circs solely in demeanor at this point

Who cares man

As long as u can r word women

Who cares

idk I'm uncircumsised and I'd say I'm pretty godlike

He he he he

> women
> disabled
> fortgay game mode

jfc

hmm I am just not seeing where it says that they didn't test the actual area that one would expect to be tested if they were going to test sensitivity of the foreskin

@NobleManWithABigHeart
Are you claiming to be a dick whisperer?

An uncircumcised man largely discusses ideas, while a circumcised man indulges in gossip

Is it still illegal to rape post?

I don’t wanna break rules so I’m asking

wtf is this garbage

i thought i was supposed to be ww2

Black queen

it

@NobleManWithABigHeart
Pretty hardline their

Black queen slaying nazis @Punished Scaredd

@shinjitsu
Because the researchers were agenda-driven liars trying to make the foreskin look useless.

It honestly doesn't matter though. Male human rights to a whole body do not depend on sexual utilitarianism.

Doubt it..
I wouldnt know bc Ive only seen my own dick