Not a super company.

It is a family.

i generally do thinking face when im actually taking time to think about what you're saying before i respond instead of responding instantly

Ok my bad then.

I just took it as a sort of sarcastic remark, no worries.

the nap is fucking gay

i just think that if someone buys something, it's theirs

I can agree with the whole idea of private property shouldn’t just be taken for reasons like ethnicity, but @TraitorGG has a point

Then the nation can be sold to the highest bidder, surely?

The nation is for its people

why is the highest bidder not the nations own people?

If Bill Gates went and started buying property of his own in Japan, and after he died it just remained his, that just wouldn’t be right

because the nation made the mistake of letting jews in, probably

There should be no "highest bidder" at all. The nation is the nation.

why do jews have more money than germans in germany?

if "the nation is for the people"

Because they naturally gravitate towards banking, like we've said.

Feel free to look into the history of individuals like Soros.

yeah yeah i know about all that

Controlling currency allows one to control far more than they should.

A frankly sickening amount of power, honestly.

i don't really see myself as debating you right now as i do trying to solve a really weird problem

Thats fine.

This is how people change their ideas and grow upon them.

Friendly discussion my dude.

also that "there should be no highest bidder" thing spooked me

Why's that?

sounds like communism shit

Do you think someone should be able to buy the nation?

no one person aught to be doing better than another

I simply took what you said and bloated it to a point that you surely should have to disagree unless you are a very, very libertarian individual. Should someone be able to just purchase the United States if they have the necessary funds?

No matter how impossible that amount to get, lets say someone hypothetically has accumulated enough wealth to do that. Should they be able to?

given that a person powerful enough to actually do something like that exists

yeah but mainly because the US is a joke country now anyway

which is your circumstance

i don't see why they shouldnt

Oof.

200 years ago, absolutely not

Well we disagree heavily then.

imagine someone having the funds in hand to buy every square foot of american soil

i mean like gold bars not mason papers

i would LOVE for someone to buy the federal government

and no one, not a single other person or even group of people were able to topple that man

then yeah

accelerationism.erection

let him purchase every square foot

one by one

although

we aren't really talking about someone buying a country

Are you a libertarian individual?

I hope I don't sound accusatory, I'm just trying to understand better.

if i tell you that i am a libertarian, are you going to treat the things i say as "those words which a libertarian might peddle"?

No.

i think we've gone into the hypothetical too much

Even if you were a communist I would just debate you as normal.

because on a base principle i agree with you

i think that a nation aught to do what is best for the most people in the nation

the people who that nation belong to

HOWEVER

it is an interesting case in the united states where we *should* view our government as one which does not grant and ungrant rights to citizens like privileges

but respects rights given to citizens by god

or by their own life if you're more of an areligious person

Well now we come to another problem.

Well it’s not a exactly a *right* if it can be taken away

and i think that private property, amongst other things, aught to be left alone without just cause

The "citizenship" question.

Oh boy

Originally, only whites could be citizens, and only land owning males could vote.

If a right can be granted or taken away at will, is it truly a right, or a privilege?

A privilege, by definition

well i said "we should view our government as one which does not grant and ungrant rights to citizens like privileges"

Well that is what we've done.

and that was the original intention of our government

but now we bannin guns n sheit

also libertarian as i may sound in certain conversations

Its ok if you are libertarian.

I was 2 years ago as well.

i totally believe passing laws restricting the business practices of companies like facebook which run the business of public forum aught to be held in violation of the constitution for undue censorship without a damn fine reason

Its a nice ideology that would work if our reality weren't as it were.

holy shit i started that sentence with one structure and finished it with a different structure

Libertarianism can only work in an ethnically homogenous rural society

the federal government is bullshit honestly. the original conception of the states as sovereign is what we should return to

The Cossacks are a really good example of that.

libertarianism is just weird boneless anarcho-capitalism

Or our own "wild west"

It also better be Hoppean libertarianism or you are gay

and the nap is gay

Also fuck the ATF

we lost sovereign states when we lost the civil war

also fuck the atf, cia, nsa, fbi, and repeal the nfa

yes

We lost sovereign states after the Articles of Confederation were scrapped

this country went off the rails in 1830

or thereabouts

<:feelsbad:385730682888126474>

The industrial revolution was also partly to blame for the huge change in America’s economic system

the important question is what comes next

civil war 2

the real question is will civil war 2 be avoided by voting or are we actually gonna have to kill feds

A civil war is inevitable

Well given the circumstances, I don’t see a civil war II being likely but voting seems like the thing more people would be willing to do

not imminent, but inevitable

on one hand i really don't wanna kill anyone
on the other hand i really wanna live in good america

If demographics keep going the way they are and rural and urban america keep drifting further away there will 🅱 a war

i think the changes we need can’t be achieved until the federal government dissolves

nap posting a bit hard

but yeah we need a new fed

lol i’m not an ancap. i think states should be able to do wild shit

Thats a chad post

this time we REALLY need to drill it into our kids heads why we dont let government get too big

the bill of rights shouldn’t apply to the states

and drill it into their heads that they should drill it into THEIR kids heads

okay thats too far bill of rights is fuckin great

the 14th amendment was a disaster

If the bill of rights didn’t apply to the states, every blue state in America would’ve probably repealed the 2nd amendment by now

Bill of rights is just the first 10

state constitutions has their own guarantees of rights

The 19th amendment was a disaster

14 and 19 are really fuckin gay

AYY

it’s not like without the 14th amendment states would just ban everything

there are too many "come and take them" types in all fifty states for guns to just be banned

states had their own constitutions because the federal bill of rights was not meant to apply to them

@seafer on his phone thats me baby

>assault rifles banned in michigan

good luck doing that in detroit

no seriously

i don't think hawaii has too many pro-gun people

good actual fucking luck

Hawaii has the least guns of any state

Hawaii is mostly minorities isn’t it

hawaii isn't even america tbh

some states would go to commie shit, others would do different stuff

Hawaii is mostly Asian

we should just glass it

honestly we should've given hawaii the puerto rico treatment

Puerto Rico should be independent

yeah

i’m fine with some states turning into shit. if that’s what they want to do

^

Cali can fuck off just lemme shoot machineguns in Iowa pls

hey fells take some time and critique my unfinished article on gun rights

if states could act more independently I can almost guarantee that the Mexican population would never had gotten as high as it is now in Texas

yeah that's true

if Texas could defend its own border it would've

Illegals should be shot on sight

same with arizona

Treated as invaders

The Aztecs should be exterminated from Texas.

is that too bad of optics

i have several mexican contacts who say the following

It kind of defeats the purpose of the “United States” if each state is basically entirely sovereign, but idk there might be more to it

Reminder that an ideological litmus test would result in an ethnostate

"yeah mexicans are kinda shitty but half the invaders are shitty south americans and even we hate them"

not even joke

They are united in dealing with foreign powers @Al_Bi

the united states are a union of states

like the european union

but without all the uhh

fucking gay

All the jewness

Like if France said "you know what, we actually want the Purchase back," the states would whoop some baguette ass

and brother hatred

before about 1830 the common conception of the country was a union of states, not as a single entity

also military

and post

Hmm I see

Very interesting

the massachusetts legislature threatened to secede in 1841

see the european union wouldnt be so bad if all european countries didnt start off hating each other

thats what the us was

little known fact

imagine the european union but all the member states actually like each other

that was us

also less autism

The EU wants to become its own country like the US <:ree:378697077066039297>

yeah but they cant

That’s the good part

because they all hate each other

germans hate frenchies and frenchies hate italians and so on and so forth

They like to leach off eachother too

Greece needs all the shekels it can get

yeah the small ones are basically the dont talk to me or my son versions of the big ones

not even 20 years after threatening secession from the union, massachusetts was sending its boys to kill their southern brethren for seceding

*I r o n y*

the secession was perfectly legal reeee

lincoln was a rude dude for not allowing it and then trying to work it out during his presidency

>letting your country fracture itself whenever it wants

the problem started when the union just outright told the states to fuck off before listening to what they wanted

lincoln should have been assassinated MUCH sooner

"you should not be able to impose laws on us territories that aren't states yet"

that's literally it

Eh, i could never advocate for assassination but i see your point

>not working with your countrymen to better understand the issues they face that are totally different to the ones you face in the north and instead just saying "eh we'll just crush em in like 6 months" but then you get your ass handed to you for 5 years straight

yea that

Read Guns of the South if you want a book about the confederacy winning the war

assassination of political leaders is a gray area in my book

It also has time traveling South African boers

not in mine

they need to have skin in the game

if you don't like your leaders kill them idfc

think about how shitty someone has to be to get assassinated

Assassinations are just morally wrong the way I see it, but I can see a point being made for them

either that or how insane someone has to be to assassinate someone

and telling them how you feel about assassinations probably wont do any good

i think it was montesquieu whose preferred form of government was “monarchy tempered by the occasional assassination”

<:bigbrain:385729869209665536> Assassinate leaders of other countries so they can become destabilized and the Jews can have one less enemy

there are very, very few assassinations that can be justified. Even if someone deserves to die, killing the leader of a nation will often spiral it into chaos unless it has a good enough system to ensure it doesn't.

^

Even if Saddam Hussein had deserved it, his nation still would’ve been fucked like it became after his death

well ok sure, you need a clear successor like in a monarchy

or a vice president

i’m still surprised nobody assassinated obama tbh

everybody thought it was gonna happen

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2018/04/18/fake-starbucks-coupon-aimed-blacks-uses-n-word/527964002/

HAHAHAHA

it just fucking implodes

I'm minutes away from Starbucks Ground Zero

Those blacks need to shower

Nick is fighting with the Ralph Report. He's taking Baked Alaska's side. Its a power move. He knows that Baked, despite being an idiot, can get him connected with good guests.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIOa4lKwNZI&feature=youtu.be

I wonder how could this starbucks incident escalate even further?

Personal opinion: Nick is incredibly manipulative, but he's pretty smart. He's taking BA's side because he know's he'll be able to play it off as being morally superior. Its a good move. Most people are blaming Baked for things that they can't directly connect to him. Baked is an idiot, he's not smart enough to do all the schemes that people are connecting to him. He's probably innocent of more than half of them.

Prediction: Nick Fuentes understands that if he wants to grow his audience he needs to make alliances. Right now Baked is in desperate need of allies if he want's to defend his position. He will take Nick on as an ally, Nick will get Bake's views, he'll also be seen as morally just when half of the things said theories about Baked turn out to be false. I think JF understands this too, which is why he has yet to condemn Baked as much as Andy.

I honestly at this point would just tell those people to fuck off and get a life

I dont think the starbucks shitshow will really turn into anything

it is hilarious to watch

Yeah lol

I sometimes wonder if it should be us weeping at the leftist dominance in america, and if it is the left that is laughing at our defeat.

California is putting forth legislation to ban the Bible

i heard

cant say i'm surprised

so much for the first amendment

I wonder (((who))) is behind this

Jews don't care about the 2A

I don't even think an atheist would push for this shit

But a Jew might

this is also the same state who knocked down knowingly infecting someone with HIV/AIDS from a felony to a misdemeanor

I dunno

i bet you some neckbeards are cumming themselves

This is just sick

AH YES FINALLY THE SHEEPLE WILL WAKE UP

I know the nwo is seen as tin foil hats and conspiracy theories, but wtf look

NWO isnt a conspiracy

its happening in real time

Exactly

I think the pope has something to do with it too

they want to turn the world into one big beige one tongued government