qotd
Discord ID: 452955238186614794
38,285 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 100/154
| Next
surprised
Which is funny because autism usually correlates with that, which is why there's so many trannies in tech, or at least it seems like there is @Doctor Anon
-spooky typing with sweaty hands to discord trust and saftey team-
i find that there is absolutely no point in talking to anyone who brings in race/ethnicity/sexuality into anything, I find it a bit rude of everyone who does that
tbh
Depends on the topic
If you talk about say crime in the USA
Race is going to inevitably come up
and you should rightfully so answer their questions about it
Blacks commit a disprotionate amount of crime compared to other races even when wealth is account for
indeed
i agree with a communist?
what the fuck?
I mean I do consider the family unit being an important part
agree again
Fuck families
fuck you
Imo
and the ***incorrect*** use
we should split up
of the welfare state
every single family
@Silkiri Im a former commie
dark times
ban married straight couples from having kids
you will transition into the right when you realize it
@SilverLining stop shitposting
low-effort shitposting
I've been a De Leonist only recently
before that I was a DemSoc
if youre going to shitpost atleast put some effort into it @SilverLining
@Silkiri Read Germany Tomorrow
Crime where I live is mainly white. While there is a significant population in prisons which are a visible minority, they are over the age of 20 and grown ass adults
But do you what to know what I learned Anon?
most people who are in prison are just generally stupid.
@Pingu What you see v.s what actually happens
nothing short of that
That's just absurd
or poor
usually just poor
Poor people are usually under educated
therefore they do stupid shit
stupid shit gets you in prison
wouldnt refute pingu's point
poverty is cyclic
child abuse is cyclic
doesn't mean there isn't a genetic explanation for it
divorces are cyclic
Child abuse also occurs disproportionately in military and police families
masturbation is cyclic
just saying
domestic abuse in general, really
child abuse is most common on families with shit relationships
Anon
I want to discuss what you said here
k
k
because shitposting is a place for shitposting
Anyway
The White Army committed ORGANIZED atrocities
so did the reds
against their own fucking citizens
Vastly more so than the reds
against rebels
not against citizens
It was justified
<:OOF:459550070942203924>
Anon
They burned entire villages
legit
Of rebels
go on
Reds killed more people during their reign than 10 tsardoms combined ever could
@SilverLining I read some statistics a while back that the mother is usually the one responsible for child abuse, but I don't have any sources on hand and therefore aren't presenting it as fact
Do you believe Communism killed 100 million?
anyways @Silkiri ill talk in about 20 min need to eat this ration from the reds
Then you ain't eating shit
Doctor Anon is a Russian
(satire)
@The Big Oof shut up dont blow my cover blyat
Cool?
it seems believable, but that's only me going off of anecdotal examples. It just seems that there are way more kids who complain about a shitty mother with a father that does nothing about it than vice versa
and?
Hey
I read somewhere that bananas contain a lot of potassium
Just thought you should know for some reason
even though it wasn't a topic being discussed whatsoever
Isn't that cool?
It was being discussed?
not really?
Did you forget what you just said?
I said that cops commit more child abuse
I didn't make any distinction based upon gender
you're conflating a lack of distinction with irrelevancy
most cops and soldiers are male, no?
if we are to go that route
Don't really see how that's irrelevant considering that it's obvious what is meant to be drawn from it
Sure?
I mean, if anything, you saying males have lower rates of domestic abuse
Not domestic abuse
and the fact that most cops and military members
child abuse, my fucking bad
I mentioned child abuse, and I said that I was going off of something I can't confirm that I read a long time ago
but the fact that most are male, and even then have higher rates of child abuse
and domestic abuse in general
So not really in any case
*in either
kinda just goes to prove exactly how significantly higher it is, I guess
Here, let me just
that was an opportunity for you to counter that, but whatever
"1 Johnson, L.B. (1991). On the front lines: Police stress and family well-being. Hearing before the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families House of Representatives: 102 Congress First Session May 20 (p. 32-48). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
2 Neidig, P.H., Russell, H.E. & Seng, A.F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. Police Studies, Vol. 15 (1), p. 30-38."
๐
they found that...
It would be pretty believable
tbh
that sort of thing happening in those families
Police families experienced rates of 40% domestic violence
compared to an average of 10%
ACAB, just saying
back
I don't doubt it
lol, what is your problem here
"just saying"
"Oh my fucking bad, well this sort of proves it"
You realize I haven't attempted to refute anything you just said
okay?
nor I?
your point?
so why are you so passive aggressive here, going "LOOK, LOOK, SEE? I'M RIGHT?"
Why are you passive aggressively bringing up random information?
you more or less implied that you wanted a citation
I gave it to you
and offered its findings
I am not being passive aggressive, argument requires compromise
"Here is what I have always thought, I might be wrong, so you can prove me wrong since I can't prove it"
I mean
being passive aggressive is what got Kevin McAllister abandoned in his house and new york
if you're interested in the random information you brought in
go ahead and research it, friend
I was more interested in yours because I had never looked into it
I'm not going to bring up some study I think I read a while ago
okay, and I gave you a citation
happy?
You're acting like I'm accusing you of being wrong/
That's somewhat implying that what I said was invalid
I mean, either way, idc
it's kinda pointless to talk over something already settled, y'know?
I agree, however, for different reasons than you
no
i'm joking
What are zoomers?
Opposite of boomerz
@everyone Daily Question ๐
Who should replace Sessions as AG? Kobach? Morrissey? The interim AG?
what's AG
Attorney general
american politics ?
i'd rather watch only then
Kobach is the best choice tbh. He may be hard to confirm
Trey Gowdy
Kobach, but it'll be difficult to actually get him into the position
@The Real Head Honcho You sure? We gained 6 Senate seats?
4 officially but 6 when you factor Corker and McCain are gone
7 if you think Lindsey Graham changed
Best form of government is no government
Or limited government
Police is awesome tho
@Earl of Morrrrgantown stop asking such specific questions like AG
Like damn
It should be I forgot his name
But the current acting AG
Should be
Whitaker? lol
Attorney general what does he lead an army of attorneys or somethin? Dvv Dvv!
@Earl of Morrrrgantown Adolf Hitler
Thoughts on LR 129? Is this something established in our near your state?
https://ballotpedia.org/Montana_LR-129,_Ballot_Collection_Measure_(2018)
is race a social construct?
@bleachgang no
According to sociology it is for some reason "no biological basis for race"
Depends on how you define race.
the reasoning just boils down to โum, sorry honey but countries fucked up on classifying it so it ainโt realโ
hence the one drop laws and the racial passing meme is brought up
thats all i seem to hear from race denialists
race is genetic
shh fellow white person race is nothing more than the phenotypic expression of your environment
@everyone Daily Question ๐
What was the golden age of the dissident/alt/new right or has it not happened yet? (It starts in the 2010s as NRx, called alt right in 2015 and achieved national attention at NPI 2016 and you know the rest)
We need to go back in time to 1488
Has not happened yet, give it another 2 years for zoomers to read up more and mature.
There is no such thing as a golden age for political movements, until you achieve your goals don't blather on about some rosy time where things were beautiful
@FlyingCondors I prefer pre 2016 alt right, back when the zoomers in it were in low numbers and granted with higher intelligence then the new stock
What the fuck Is this question
It's gay
I hope the alt right never rises
I don't want basement dwelling cunts in power
The alt-righters are libtards ๐ค
@Doctor Anon thinking they are all basement dwellers means you underestimate them.... yes... good... good.
They are a fringe political movement that has nothing to do with the American Conservative movement
Zoomers rise up.
ZOOMERS
RISE UP!!!
The alt right now is trash but back then, it was just racially aware paleocons + NRx
We must secure the existence of...
brown babies
Die
I was counting on you guys
The alt right had a pseudo golden age with coming to media attention, this resulted in their well, absolute burial. However the alt right is heading moreso towards a schism. Youll be left with the alt right that has 1488 cringy bois and then the nationalists will break off, right now they are a vocal and large group within the alt right, both racially aware and isolationist, some are fascist monarchist democratic etc. However their place isnt officially IMo in the alt right. They will eventually splinter off when they realise the differences between them and the alt right, IMO that might even be the difference between the revolutionary drive and the reformist
and generally people find reformists more palpable unless the revolutionary has some absolutely absurd charisma (also there is more htan enough pan euro rhetoric and ideas in the alt right. such as white nationalism being a thing for all euro nations and not at all will be used to subvert them in the future. *Cough* Richard spencer)
Former alt lite people are now becoming alt right mainstream, and theyโre shifting this kind of alt right mentality to replace the mainstream right wing, people like Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern, so soon the alt right will be the mainstream right and once again it will be controlled
I see the issue of it being controlled. This is the #1 danger
and IMO it does need a revolutionary spirit to it, a warrior spirit
IMo the way the west survives is rising up and embracing the "dark" masculine warrior nature, bringing back patriarchy and the warrior class
sure it might bring a lot of turmoil but it guarantees succes and cannot be controlled effectively
Golden age will begin after the system collapse
well i posted that in the wrong place wtf. welp time to delete
It hasn't happened yet. The high point was getting side-mouthed pandering to by Trump and Shillary trying to nag at them for how 'immoral' they are. The movement hasn't died. No one who seriously becomes aware of demographic changes and the failure of the political parties in nearly ALL white nations suddenly just says, aw fuck it I'mma vote for the neocon now. It goes one direction only, further right.
I have a feeling we're going to see a dissident group of new-money billionaires funneling resources to someone with some strong New Right positions, and willing to go the distance. Otherwise they get to see lots of things they like about American/European culture **die** when Western civilization turns into a giant 3rd-word favela. Depending on how their assets are secured, they may even lose it all if the US economy shits the bed (someone better informed on how billionaires secure their wealth, please fill me in). The country is full of people that are alienated by the media, alienated by all the major institutions, and now their one "God Emperor" is failing to do a single fucking thing they elected him for, and signaling his alliance with a separate class entirely. It's absolutely ripe for a real leader with some new positions and the willingness and ability to push them through. There's no where else to run. People can sense it. Now you get to see if it was a good idea to corner the animal.
@everyone Daily Question ๐ Should the west reintroduce Imperialism as a means to control third world migration and to strengthen industry destroyed by globalization? (think of the American Colonies's roles in mercantilism)
Yes
how will Imperialism help
Yes
no
defend, not attack
Imperialism got us into this mess
@Deleted User If you have control of Africa, you can control who moves northward
sharing our technology got us into this mess
No, we should boot them from our countries and let them grow on their own. Had enough of fucking with those shitholes
Considering how people in the 3rd world have advanced with technology, that sounds like a recipe for diaster.
agreed
@L0GAN and the shittest
you might be powerful but that doesn't mean you are any "good"
i;m meh about immigration
as long as it brings in more of the working class it's fine
but poor syrians seeking refuge? nah man
fuck brown people ๐
@Deleted User If you make the people there happy, they won't migrate. Especially if you control the borders of the region
so you do that by invading a country and expecting it to stabilize because whites run it
you could do that shit with foreign affairs
When we take power, the UN and NATO will not limit us
A resurgence of nationalist fervor
Destroying the Paradigm we have lived and suffered through since 1918
No international treaty or organization will stop us
In fact, the puppet masters who control the west shall be executed by the same methods they used on our people
by indoctrinating them with moderately-left agendas?
sounds stupid
@Deleted User No. We shall give the public the ability to decide their fate, just like the crowd did with Jesus
They chose him over the murderer Barbaras and these same people will be subject to us avenging him
<:Chad:476653434637123584>
38,285 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 100/154
| Next