debate

Discord ID: 450683222653796353


16,153 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 5/162 | Next

2018-05-28 16:53:59 UTC

Taxes dont matter

2018-05-28 16:54:04 UTC

this guy

2018-05-28 16:54:06 UTC

Capitalists believe it is good for a nation to have a people whose goal in life is to make money.

2018-05-28 16:54:42 UTC

what is your definitive understanding of capitalism, tankie?

2018-05-28 16:54:42 UTC

This guy is so far left he literally thinks if you believe in private property you're a capitalist.

2018-05-28 16:54:57 UTC

Because it's true

2018-05-28 16:55:08 UTC

I'm a corporatist and a distributist.

2018-05-28 16:55:20 UTC

So?

2018-05-28 16:55:22 UTC

@Advocatus Diaboli define capitalism

2018-05-28 16:55:27 UTC

i'll humor you

2018-05-28 16:56:20 UTC

considering you believe that a pogrom is anti jewish violence

2018-05-28 16:56:29 UTC

i dont see your definitions as being wholly correct

2018-05-28 16:56:30 UTC

Capitalism is an economic system with private property of the means of production where wage labour is used to produce goods and services

2018-05-28 16:56:51 UTC

define private property then because no system today has total private property

2018-05-28 16:57:34 UTC

using your definition only anarcho-capitalism abides

2018-05-28 16:57:56 UTC

your understanding of capitalism is a system that has any private property at all

2018-05-28 16:58:01 UTC

which is completely untrue

2018-05-28 16:58:21 UTC

and has never been treated as such by anyone except for marx and his followers.

2018-05-28 17:03:26 UTC

Private property is a right of individual to manage things he owns in a way he considers the most beneficial

2018-05-28 17:04:22 UTC

@Advocatus Diaboli ok, so then by your definition of capitalism there is no system in the world that is capitalistic. Because every system has **some** public ownership

2018-05-28 17:05:12 UTC

again, if your definition of capitalism is that there just **is** private ownership at all, then I do not accept your definition and think it is ludicrous

2018-05-28 17:05:56 UTC

Please put in mind that personal property =/= private property

2018-05-28 17:06:36 UTC

Lol wtf

2018-05-28 17:06:47 UTC

@Advocatus Diaboli and there is public property in every system too, if you want me to abide by your differentiation

2018-05-28 17:07:03 UTC

natural monopolies, for instance

2018-05-28 17:07:12 UTC

national railways

2018-05-28 17:07:19 UTC

fucking streetlights

2018-05-28 17:07:25 UTC

and roads

2018-05-28 17:07:35 UTC

sewage systems

2018-05-28 17:08:07 UTC

Teddy Roosevelt will always be one of my favorite presidents

2018-05-28 17:09:24 UTC

If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism

2018-05-28 17:10:17 UTC

Because the only purpose of private property is making profit

2018-05-28 17:10:49 UTC

What do you mean by private property

2018-05-28 17:11:14 UTC

@Advocatus Diaboli like I said, that is not capitalism

2018-05-28 17:11:17 UTC

What is the purpose of profit though?

2018-05-28 17:11:19 UTC

that's an absolutist take i've never heard of

2018-05-28 17:11:20 UTC

that is your view of capitalism

2018-05-28 17:11:27 UTC

it's a very uneducated and broad view

2018-05-28 17:11:33 UTC

What is capitalism then?

2018-05-28 17:11:33 UTC

Is it profit to fund something, or profit because you just want to be rich?

2018-05-28 17:11:40 UTC
2018-05-28 17:11:50 UTC

What is private property to you

2018-05-28 17:11:51 UTC

Capitalism exists on a spectrum.

2018-05-28 17:11:58 UTC

@GucciToiletSalesman Scroll up a bit, there's my answer

2018-05-28 17:12:02 UTC

K

2018-05-28 17:12:30 UTC

Wait

2018-05-28 17:12:32 UTC

Capitalism is not a political ideology, it's an economic system

2018-05-28 17:12:38 UTC

By your definition every system EVER has been capitalistic

2018-05-28 17:12:43 UTC

So is hunting grounds considered for profit?

2018-05-28 17:12:44 UTC

What

2018-05-28 17:13:04 UTC

there has never been a system where a man did not make something and sell it to someone for profit.

2018-05-28 17:13:06 UTC

Because most hunting grounds are either state owned or private property

2018-05-28 17:13:25 UTC

and there never will be one

2018-05-28 17:13:30 UTC

USSR

2018-05-28 17:13:34 UTC

wrong

2018-05-28 17:13:40 UTC

1929-1956

2018-05-28 17:13:47 UTC

you dont think there were people who created objects and sold them?

2018-05-28 17:13:59 UTC

you think that was outside the realm of possibility?

2018-05-28 17:14:08 UTC

they existed

2018-05-28 17:14:11 UTC

they existed for profit

2018-05-28 17:14:12 UTC

therefore

2018-05-28 17:14:17 UTC

capitalism

2018-05-28 17:14:19 UTC

so

2018-05-28 17:14:23 UTC

stalin was a capitalist pig

2018-05-28 17:14:26 UTC

kill him

2018-05-28 17:15:03 UTC

You forgot about the second part of my definition

2018-05-28 17:15:06 UTC

Waged labour

2018-05-28 17:15:54 UTC

no, like you said

2018-05-28 17:16:02 UTC

"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"

2018-05-28 17:16:10 UTC

the communist loves to abuse definitions

2018-05-28 17:16:17 UTC

this goy isn't falling for it.

2018-05-28 17:17:01 UTC

and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao

2018-05-28 17:17:08 UTC

before and after stalin

2018-05-28 17:18:01 UTC

But it wasn't waged labour because the means of production were owned by the workers

2018-05-28 17:19:02 UTC

look above your own quoted definition

2018-05-28 17:19:19 UTC

if x then y

2018-05-28 17:19:27 UTC

x = corporation existing

2018-05-28 17:19:31 UTC

y = capitalism

2018-05-28 17:19:37 UTC

x existed in communism

2018-05-28 17:19:46 UTC

therefore it was capitalism

2018-05-28 17:20:02 UTC

Corporations didn't exist in the USSR during 1929-1956

2018-05-28 17:20:03 UTC

and the wage was the profit the man makes from selling his object

this kind of discussion belongs in the regular politicord but alright lol

2018-05-28 17:20:32 UTC

legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself

2018-05-28 17:21:30 UTC

you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong

2018-05-28 17:21:48 UTC

one man can undertake the role of a corporation

2018-05-28 17:21:53 UTC

and in my example the man does so

2018-05-28 17:22:29 UTC

if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit

2018-05-28 17:26:00 UTC

Look, I can't precisely translate the term to English. In my language there's a term for a company where owners theirselves don't participate in the process of production. English word 'corporation' is just a rough equivalent.

2018-05-28 17:26:11 UTC

Where you form anyhow

2018-05-28 17:26:21 UTC

Ukraine

2018-05-28 17:26:25 UTC

Huh

2018-05-28 17:26:28 UTC

same thing

2018-05-28 17:26:31 UTC

Ukraine huh

2018-05-28 17:27:14 UTC

Interesting

2018-05-28 17:27:38 UTC

@Advocatus Diaboli that doesn't matter

2018-05-28 17:27:58 UTC

private property isn't just made in the form of a corporation

16,153 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 5/162 | Next