Message from @🦅 𝓔𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓔𝔂𝓮 🦅
Discord ID: 450709886217748480
stalin was a capitalist pig
kill him
You forgot about the second part of my definition
Waged labour
no, like you said
"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"
the communist loves to abuse definitions
this goy isn't falling for it.
and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao
before and after stalin
But it wasn't waged labour because the means of production were owned by the workers
look above your own quoted definition
if x then y
x = corporation existing
y = capitalism
x existed in communism
therefore it was capitalism
Corporations didn't exist in the USSR during 1929-1956
and the wage was the profit the man makes from selling his object
this kind of discussion belongs in the regular politicord but alright lol
legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself
you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong
one man can undertake the role of a corporation
and in my example the man does so
if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit
Look, I can't precisely translate the term to English. In my language there's a term for a company where owners theirselves don't participate in the process of production. English word 'corporation' is just a rough equivalent.
Where you form anyhow
a russo obviously
Ukraine
Huh
same thing
Ukraine huh
bloody separatist!
Interesting
@Advocatus Diaboli that doesn't matter
private property isn't just made in the form of a corporation
you said yourself you arent allowed to sell for profit if you make your own wares
Again, capitalism = private property + waged labour
yes, and selling a duck toy for a profit is a wage
WHAT