kill him

You forgot about the second part of my definition

Waged labour

no, like you said

"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"

the communist loves to abuse definitions

this goy isn't falling for it.

and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao

before and after stalin

But it wasn't waged labour because the means of production were owned by the workers

look above your own quoted definition

if x then y

x = corporation existing

y = capitalism

x existed in communism

therefore it was capitalism

Corporations didn't exist in the USSR during 1929-1956

and the wage was the profit the man makes from selling his object

this kind of discussion belongs in the regular politicord but alright lol

!rank

legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself

you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong

one man can undertake the role of a corporation

and in my example the man does so

if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit

Look, I can't precisely translate the term to English. In my language there's a term for a company where owners theirselves don't participate in the process of production. English word 'corporation' is just a rough equivalent.

Where you form anyhow

a russo obviously

Ukraine

Huh

same thing

Ukraine huh

bloody separatist!

Interesting

@Advocatus Diaboli that doesn't matter

private property isn't just made in the form of a corporation

you said yourself you arent allowed to sell for profit if you make your own wares

Again, capitalism = private property + waged labour

yes, and selling a duck toy for a profit is a wage

WHAT

I love selling stuff