Message from @Adoring Fan
Discord ID: 450709855221710848
capitalism
so
stalin was a capitalist pig
kill him
You forgot about the second part of my definition
Waged labour
no, like you said
"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"
the communist loves to abuse definitions
this goy isn't falling for it.
and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao
before and after stalin
But it wasn't waged labour because the means of production were owned by the workers
look above your own quoted definition
if x then y
x = corporation existing
y = capitalism
x existed in communism
therefore it was capitalism
Corporations didn't exist in the USSR during 1929-1956
this kind of discussion belongs in the regular politicord but alright lol
!rank
legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself
you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong
one man can undertake the role of a corporation
and in my example the man does so
if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit
Look, I can't precisely translate the term to English. In my language there's a term for a company where owners theirselves don't participate in the process of production. English word 'corporation' is just a rough equivalent.
Where you form anyhow
a russo obviously
Ukraine
Huh
same thing
Ukraine huh
bloody separatist!
Interesting
@Advocatus Diaboli that doesn't matter
private property isn't just made in the form of a corporation
you said yourself you arent allowed to sell for profit if you make your own wares
Again, capitalism = private property + waged labour