Message from @Adoring Fan
Discord ID: 450708846059454464
So is hunting grounds considered for profit?
What
there has never been a system where a man did not make something and sell it to someone for profit.
Because most hunting grounds are either state owned or private property
and there never will be one
USSR
wrong
1929-1956
you dont think there were people who created objects and sold them?
you think that was outside the realm of possibility?
they existed
they existed for profit
therefore
capitalism
so
stalin was a capitalist pig
kill him
You forgot about the second part of my definition
Waged labour
no, like you said
"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"
the communist loves to abuse definitions
this goy isn't falling for it.
and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao
before and after stalin
But it wasn't waged labour because the means of production were owned by the workers
look above your own quoted definition
if x then y
x = corporation existing
y = capitalism
x existed in communism
therefore it was capitalism
Corporations didn't exist in the USSR during 1929-1956
and the wage was the profit the man makes from selling his object
this kind of discussion belongs in the regular politicord but alright lol
!rank
legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself
you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong
one man can undertake the role of a corporation
and in my example the man does so
if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit