Not just pictures with estimates.

I want exact.

Or else it's not proof.

Ye exact proof

🌟

😂

Oh wow, amazing proof!

That helps

I guess I'm a flat-earther now.

**Sarcasm**.

Yes

U r

@welcome to fe

I apologise in advance, if I'm rude.

I haven't had a full night's rest, I woke up in a bad mood. Anyway, so, may I get your proof?

Test the moonlight vs moonshade

Why believe anyone but your self

that doesnt answer his question tho

^

I asked how does the moon imite its own light, without the correct gases/chemicals.

Shall the conversation end here? I haven't gotten an answer.

are there any endothermic reactions that emit light?

i dont think there are cause that doesnt make sense, but 🤷

The ones fireflies imite.

They use a chemical.

well, obvious it uses a chemical

But, according to @Soldz (CF), it doesn't contain any chemicals, own any gases, or reflect light.

^

So, what does it gain its light source from?

We have been asking him this from an hour.

And he refuses to answer.

Ye

Either continue the conversation or end it, it's pointless to say one sentence.

No responses? Conversation ended. @Soldz (CF), this did not help me understand anything.

I never said that but k

Are you sure?

"I'll get someone to explain it better to you".

Never happend

@⎛⎝/(Drqgon)\⎠⎞ sorry that I couldnt

Its just not possible to find that sort of thing without going to the moon

Sorry for being rude, again, woke up in a bad mood.

It is, using the right equipment.

There is a way to do moon light tho

At least show the effects of it

An ALMA.

Yes, but, that doesn't show how the light is created.

There **MUST** be a source.

However, I haven't met anyone who could portrait that for me.

he is asking for how, not if the moon creates light

Brrr

How does a light create light? @DrPeper

Like a light bulb?

Or just as a general question how is light created

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemiluminescence

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphorescence

What about them

@shroominati !

What about it? Its just about other explanations other than just saying its a reflection.

Ok, what is causing the light then

There are ways to tell what made the light

@⎛⎝/(Drqgon)\⎠⎞ have you ever tried taking a dust covered ball and tried to reflect light off it? Have you tested the temperature of the moonlight vs the moonshade?

You can reflect light off of dirty things, how do you think you are seeing it?

You can see the light but try to reflect it onto something else

Get a powerful enough light source and it isn't hard

Well try it

What am I going off about. You don't need to do that

If you can see something it is reflecting or giving off light

How your eyes work

No..I'm talking about reflecting light

The moon lights up the surface of the earth like reflecting light off a mirror

Yeah, if you can see it and it isn't emitting light. It is reflecting light

https://youtu.be/fDYYcFn5BYE

You can view this for yourself

Ok, what is cause the moon to emitt light

I dont have all the answers for you unfortunately. I can just tell you there is more than one explanation. We must still discover for ourselves if we know the exact truth or if there is more to everything

Maybe the sun charges the moon. Maybe some type of radiation charges the moon.

Z, I will tell you how I feel about people just shooting down ideas without a better idea. It's useless not just talking about fe, in everything; politics, science, history, whatever. If you don't have a idea to replace the bad idea. It's useless to say so. Just saying it's bad isn't helpful . you need something to replace it.

You only have ideas. What do you think saying the moonlight is only a reflection of solar radiation? Thats an IDEA.

Why or how the moon lights up is currently misunderstood. it is recognised that the amount of light we receive from the moon exceeds that which could solely the suns reflection.

The moons non atmosphere is flourescing under the effects of other solar radiation.

Its theorized the earth daylight is generated the same way. Tesla understood this principle and was illuminating his labs by making the air at ceiling level fluoresce creating indoors daylight.

The earths sky changes during the day. It can be very light blue to a deep blue depending on the time of day.

ok, even if i agree with you, you still dont have a better answer

that is my problem

you dont have a better answer

You dont have an answer either. Just assumptions and theories also

You dont know. Just like i dont know.

here is my point, the main stream model for the light is there for what ever reason you want to say. If you cant give a solution that is better then it. Then what you are saying isnt useful

you cant answer the simple question of what is making the moon light emit light. The whole point you are making is that the moon is creating light. If you cant answer the question of how, why is your theory any more useful

There is solutions. You choose to downplay them or ignore them.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/incredible-inventions-of-nikola-tesla/

ok, so the moon is fluorescent

Just as good

Considering we dont know for sure.

if it is equally good, then it still doesnt matter. A new idea has to be better to replace the current idea. In anything, again not just here

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Meaning, one idea might be good to one person but another idea might be just as good to another

i am not saying its a bad idea, i am saying if it isnt better then there is no point, at the current time, trying to replace it. if it becomes better, sure replace it

Ive given a pretty good explanation i think. Considering chemiluminescence or phosphorescence can light up minerals and showing that fluorescence can do the same thing and even make it look like a moonlight

Reflection is the easiest answer

But not the right answer necessarily

actually all you said is that bio/chem/phosphoreencence are a thing and something looks on the surface looks like moonlight

Also the temperature differences of the light

Which brings everything into question

you expect them to be the extact temperature?

There must be something more to it all

If the moon was reflecting the sun light, then the moonlight should be warm not cold

But we see the opposite

how it is "cold"

the experiments done show a few degree drop in temp

thats not "cold"

Its sure not hot

Yes its "colder than"

so do you expect them to be the exact same temp

well i can tell you it isnt flurescent or phosphorecent because both of those rely on the sun to function

or an other light source

Or radiation

light is a form of radiation

so, yes

visible or UV radiation

im struggling to grasp what you mean bby cold light, does a mere drop in temp make the light cold

It can be energy absorbed then it is released as light

so then you have chem/biolumicentent

The drop of temperature makes it cold yes

and going back to my orginal question of, what is the actual cause of the chem/biolumicentant, how it getting the reactants needed

@Satan i mean, if you take a temperature reading of the surface of something being hit by the moonlight, it is generally colder than the same surface just inches away in the moonshade. So moonlight is cold.

@DrPeper solar radiation

that a) isnt chem/biolumicentant b) still requires the sun to hit the moon with visible light

So ?

so when the visible lights hits the moon, it would reflect off

Sunlight ≠ Moonlight | just do an experiment it will show you the results of moonlight lowering the temperature on a plant for example @Satan

The sun light hits the moon. Charges it then the moon glows

I dont know for sure. Neither do you

Gtg. Bbl

Visible light would just reflect off, aka the mainstream model. UV radiation is what you need for phoroscent or flurencent lights sources

also, i am just going to assume it isnt biolumiencent since i doubt you think there are living things on the moon

i wonder why f.e's wont use spectrometer

i thought i mentioned that

What about them

you can figure out what emited the light

Fluorescence is light energy produced by a process wherehigh-energy radiation (such as ultraviolet or X-ray) is absorbed byelectrons surrounding an atom and is re-emitted as light energy. Phosphoresence is light energy produced by a particular typeof chemical reaction where the excess chemical energy of thereactants is given off as light energy. http://www.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_use_Phosphorescent_in_a_sentence

u did pepe

Chemical reaction

no

it isnt a chemical reaction

a chemical reaction emitting light is chemiluminsscent

the only differnce between fluresencet and phosphoresence is the time it takes for the energy to be realeased as light

the former is immediately and the latter is over time

https://www.aulis.com

https://youtu.be/QdWPYgrP4uQ

Looks like something's happened that might make for an interesting debate. The main subreddit for the Qanon conspiracy was just banned.

<:ohheck:485078351162376202>

Lmao

I am just the messenger and don't want to debate I've got a long day ahead don't have the time

have a great day

Have a safe day my dear @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS

@Kφsho™ yo

had your roles messed up, you should be able to speak man

dang I just now seen this

@Deleted User no offence; nearly every aspect of what’s come from that sounds like its been positive; just I’ve come to see it a little differently. As in the wolf in sheep's clothes, the king of this world satan can warp reality; he’s the master of lie’s and deception. I believe by sedating the followers of christ till death in a “godly” embrace that he prevents them from seeking the divine expressions one can build to experience other worldly capabilities; that within this “I know that I know” system of reinforced beliefs/experiences he keeps those on the edge of divinity from justifying further invocations of your nature within/as a child of god.

Ah, there you are 😁

One of the greatest messages I’ve tried to grasp/come to terms with is how they say you can do all things through god/christ; as in within the mindset of justifications/empowerment “you” can do as he has done; as he said that blatantly. What I’ve done is looked into the systems of explanation/etc that provide a framework of building experiences that lead one to that state of christ like divinity; and have found its very real and nearly all “mainstream” theology/religion is based around distancing the practice from the preacher.

infact to no degree is society, well the hands behind its creation; formed our "reality" in a way to create minds that would never seek such things in the first place

@Mr.J I do see all things in this World through a spiritual lens. I understand skepticism as we have awakened to the tremendous lies of the enemy of our souls. I also see great freedom and beauty in realizing that I was born into a corrupt and sinful flesh that needed redemption. I, in myself am not divine. Reaching a place of divinity is placing us equal with CHRIST, and we are no such being.

“We” are not; as the we is a statement of ego/experience/duality; but understanding that “we” are an expression of divinity is not the same as saying we are no such being of christ like potential.

By the way I’m not saying you/anybody for that matter will ever walk on water or turn water to wine etc; just that through the right practices you could enter alternate state of mind within which realities manifest of divine complexities/potentials of ever building intensities; and from this ever growing experience of limitless proportions one can “be” more than which he is; while awake/here he may be a janitor, or whatnot; his actions/motives/thoughts etc could become christ like etc.

But the element of Unknown that science is bridging the gap between fantasy and reality is backing up “occult/esoteric” views of “magic” more or less that by doing such practices you alter the reality in which you manifest within; by perception and description for lack of better terms you can exhibit discernment etc; but it’s being seen/found that reality itself through chance/will etc echo’s the will’s/intentions etc of the innate minds behind the ego’s in which we are an expression of; law of attraction is in essence putting yourself on a path and “praying” upon and working within many of the same mindsets christianity proposes. Its this nature of reality and that of significance within “dreaming” etc that can be brought into scales of divinity that echo christ like divinity.

Suppose i should cut to the chase; Witchcraft/satanism is only “evil” in the intentions/beliefs that bring you to justifications of “evil”. It’s like saying a gun is evil; when it’s just a tool. Much of this nature of reality/divinity has been sealed off to christians because of this dogma/stigma those of these luciferian beliefs have installed to prevent the masses from ever seeking any such potentials within themselves; as a result many “empathically” come into some of this in essence, be it thoughts or compassion; it’s clear that many can “hear” your thoughts/feelings etc or at the very least “god” does and echo’s in response.
(the latter bit of this regarding what others do is speculation)

@Mr.J CHRIST, GOD in the flesh willingly gave HIS life in order to restore intimacy with HIM. To reconcile our soul to our creator where we could live dependent on HIM. We can do no good thing without CHRIST is a constant reminder of our corrupt flesh whose works can never justify a man in presence of a HOLY GOD. We must trust in HIS righteousness and HIS covering, simple childlike Faith. As we grow in the Grace of GOD we live out a continuous death of our flesh and the lusts thereof. Taking up our cross daily, sheep for the slaughter, we decrease and CHRIST in us increases. HIS divinity living in the human temple shines brighter through the death of our own stubborn pride and ego.

@Mr.J LOL, my appologies I am sitting at a park where so many of GODs lil creatures are to cute, I was distracted. 🤗

@Mr.J You also type faster than I do 😁

@DrPeper LOL

@Mr.J I was not in any way trying diminish our conversation just trying to identify why I was behind in responding. GOD was blessing me and I was taking it in.

How I’ve come to understand that is within “Christ” consciousness (the waking state of mind/body) as we live within the flesh of sin we must keep in our hearts the passion the story of christ portrays; and its within this compassion we draw from god to fuel our passion in a purity akin to god. Be it imperfect/petty/egotistical sure, but it’s meant to be done/justified within the scope of Christ/Gods lessons. This in the end equals just teaching humans how to care beyond themselves; to lead them upon an eden of their own design not within sin but despite “reality”. To feed them inspiration beyond the terms of fleshly bonds; and to provide them with an answer beyond any signs. In the end Its a psy-op; one of slumbering desire; it draws from a humbling so deep that none would seek beyond that what they are. In essence what I’m saying is they formed a story book to inspire the greatest self driven perpetual slave machine; a nation of followers so justified in their actions/in-actions that nothing could be done to sway there step beyond that of the death. To be everything I’ve learned is in spite of the very essence of this; everything I’ve sought points towards this being nothing more than a side step; one of greatness without a doubt; but a side step nonetheless; because there is so much more you can do within just the mind alone to build upon what it means to be you, that “most” people who do go down these roads not only come to greater terms with peace/themselves; but do so not in spite of what/who they are, but because of it. It’s the difference between shoving everything under the rug and moving houses to cleaning your shit up and building the temple of god.

@Deleted User its okay; getting into these kinda debates takes me time to form meaningfull stuffs; as the cornerstone that got me through the good/bad/etc was not to dwell upon it; that what if's and speculation are nothing short of "satain"s fear spreading through madness of one's own design. So when we talk like this in general its good for me to re-channel these old topics; it helps bring out more of it from the past and re-afirm where/why/who I've come to be

(but most of all who I hope to be 😄 )

@Mr.J What in-actions are you referring to?

those of lacking inspiration, the things that are never done because one has never been of/in a mind to think/inspire to do such things

@Mr.J I am very sensitive to any belief system that promotes glory being given to any being other than CHRIST HIMSELF. I fear that a blending of belief systems can only bring self exaltation and a diminishing of GOD. Perhaps I may not fully understand some of the points you are making.

@Mr.J Blessings to you, I must run to grab some grub! Hope to have further discussions!

well the biggest thing I could elaborate upon would be the nature of coming into this; the cornerstone of “this” is the depths of mindful surrender to the powers outside of yourself. Those that follow this path so to speak don’t do so in the I am mentality; much like how you claim to be completely surrendered to christ; I to am in a mindset of powerlessness. It’s not about “being” christ/god like; it’s about being as humble as christ. But the biggest difference i see is that those who “follow” christ do so at their own leisure; it’s not what pushes them further but what sedates them within what they deem necessary. In essence many of those that follow christ continue on as they are; but any/every one who goes down the route of meditation/mindfulness completely changes in nearly every perceivable area of there phycology; when done to proficient extents.

Furries and traps are gay, change my mind. @Fireflash

I agree tho

Ow the edge

Good.

statistically, like 70% of furs are gay

also traps are just logically gay

And you are one of them.

Correct

Sad.

Live and let live

pretty much agree with that all

What's the harm

the harm is pretending you are something your not

If a trap is into women, are they straight or still gay?

they want to be labeled as women even though they are men, beat up on women like Selena in tennis

when they clearly are not women

wat

Selena williams is a TG

I see.

who is "they" tho

so is robin willaism

' "they" want to be labeled...'

the transgender community are pushing the transgender agenda

its in all the colleges

🤔

who is they tho, in your previous messages

I'd say that it is getting forced in a lot of people's point of view.

Which is true.

Yeah

its pervassive, they have an agenda to normalize transgenderism and its all thru-out holllywood

We call it the transaction Kevin. You learn at the first meeting

and music

Kevin

You said "they want to be labeled as women...[etc]"

who is "they"?

S c a r y
G a y
P e o p l e

all people who TG

Lmao.

what is TG-ing

you know mork from mork and mindy

you're using it as a verb it seems

OH

The pronoun thing is my biggest problem regarding it.

LMAO

OLD REFERENCES

dead dude, he was a FTM

So what's TG?

robin williams

transgender

Ohhh

TG

Wait what.

Gay != transgender

Was Robin WIlliams gay?

🤔

Nah he wasn't

gay doesn't mean transgender

Alright.

you are screwing up terminology to confuse yourself

Hr was gay tho

I think..

He had a wife and kids lol

He wasn't gay

adopted kids

Bruh.

she, robin williams was born a female and TG'ed to a male

moved like a woman

<:Stalin:485562708205502464>

You are talking about that movie he played in aren't you?

Everyone is trans! Scary

no, I'm saying there are videos of him showing his wide ass woman bone structure to bare children