you dont have a better answer

You dont have an answer either. Just assumptions and theories also

You dont know. Just like i dont know.

here is my point, the main stream model for the light is there for what ever reason you want to say. If you cant give a solution that is better then it. Then what you are saying isnt useful

you cant answer the simple question of what is making the moon light emit light. The whole point you are making is that the moon is creating light. If you cant answer the question of how, why is your theory any more useful

There is solutions. You choose to downplay them or ignore them.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/incredible-inventions-of-nikola-tesla/

ok, so the moon is fluorescent

Just as good

Considering we dont know for sure.

if it is equally good, then it still doesnt matter. A new idea has to be better to replace the current idea. In anything, again not just here

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Meaning, one idea might be good to one person but another idea might be just as good to another

i am not saying its a bad idea, i am saying if it isnt better then there is no point, at the current time, trying to replace it. if it becomes better, sure replace it

Ive given a pretty good explanation i think. Considering chemiluminescence or phosphorescence can light up minerals and showing that fluorescence can do the same thing and even make it look like a moonlight

Reflection is the easiest answer

But not the right answer necessarily

actually all you said is that bio/chem/phosphoreencence are a thing and something looks on the surface looks like moonlight

Also the temperature differences of the light

Which brings everything into question

you expect them to be the extact temperature?

There must be something more to it all

If the moon was reflecting the sun light, then the moonlight should be warm not cold

But we see the opposite

how it is "cold"

the experiments done show a few degree drop in temp

thats not "cold"

Its sure not hot

Yes its "colder than"

so do you expect them to be the exact same temp

well i can tell you it isnt flurescent or phosphorecent because both of those rely on the sun to function

or an other light source

Or radiation

light is a form of radiation

so, yes

visible or UV radiation

im struggling to grasp what you mean bby cold light, does a mere drop in temp make the light cold

It can be energy absorbed then it is released as light

so then you have chem/biolumicentent

The drop of temperature makes it cold yes

and going back to my orginal question of, what is the actual cause of the chem/biolumicentant, how it getting the reactants needed