Get a powerful enough light source and it isn't hard

Well try it

What am I going off about. You don't need to do that

If you can see something it is reflecting or giving off light

How your eyes work

No..I'm talking about reflecting light

The moon lights up the surface of the earth like reflecting light off a mirror

Yeah, if you can see it and it isn't emitting light. It is reflecting light

https://youtu.be/fDYYcFn5BYE

You can view this for yourself

Ok, what is cause the moon to emitt light

I dont have all the answers for you unfortunately. I can just tell you there is more than one explanation. We must still discover for ourselves if we know the exact truth or if there is more to everything

Maybe the sun charges the moon. Maybe some type of radiation charges the moon.

Z, I will tell you how I feel about people just shooting down ideas without a better idea. It's useless not just talking about fe, in everything; politics, science, history, whatever. If you don't have a idea to replace the bad idea. It's useless to say so. Just saying it's bad isn't helpful . you need something to replace it.

You only have ideas. What do you think saying the moonlight is only a reflection of solar radiation? Thats an IDEA.

Why or how the moon lights up is currently misunderstood. it is recognised that the amount of light we receive from the moon exceeds that which could solely the suns reflection.

The moons non atmosphere is flourescing under the effects of other solar radiation.

Its theorized the earth daylight is generated the same way. Tesla understood this principle and was illuminating his labs by making the air at ceiling level fluoresce creating indoors daylight.

The earths sky changes during the day. It can be very light blue to a deep blue depending on the time of day.

ok, even if i agree with you, you still dont have a better answer

that is my problem

you dont have a better answer

You dont have an answer either. Just assumptions and theories also

You dont know. Just like i dont know.

here is my point, the main stream model for the light is there for what ever reason you want to say. If you cant give a solution that is better then it. Then what you are saying isnt useful

you cant answer the simple question of what is making the moon light emit light. The whole point you are making is that the moon is creating light. If you cant answer the question of how, why is your theory any more useful

There is solutions. You choose to downplay them or ignore them.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/science/incredible-inventions-of-nikola-tesla/

ok, so the moon is fluorescent

Just as good

Considering we dont know for sure.

if it is equally good, then it still doesnt matter. A new idea has to be better to replace the current idea. In anything, again not just here

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Meaning, one idea might be good to one person but another idea might be just as good to another

i am not saying its a bad idea, i am saying if it isnt better then there is no point, at the current time, trying to replace it. if it becomes better, sure replace it

Ive given a pretty good explanation i think. Considering chemiluminescence or phosphorescence can light up minerals and showing that fluorescence can do the same thing and even make it look like a moonlight

Reflection is the easiest answer

But not the right answer necessarily

actually all you said is that bio/chem/phosphoreencence are a thing and something looks on the surface looks like moonlight

Also the temperature differences of the light

Which brings everything into question

you expect them to be the extact temperature?

There must be something more to it all

If the moon was reflecting the sun light, then the moonlight should be warm not cold

But we see the opposite