Message from @DrPeper
Discord ID: 488423622419939358
and going back to my orginal question of, what is the actual cause of the chem/biolumicentant, how it getting the reactants needed
@Satan i mean, if you take a temperature reading of the surface of something being hit by the moonlight, it is generally colder than the same surface just inches away in the moonshade. So moonlight is cold.
that a) isnt chem/biolumicentant b) still requires the sun to hit the moon with visible light
So ?
so when the visible lights hits the moon, it would reflect off
Sunlight ≠ Moonlight | just do an experiment it will show you the results of moonlight lowering the temperature on a plant for example @Satan
The sun light hits the moon. Charges it then the moon glows
I dont know for sure. Neither do you
Gtg. Bbl
Visible light would just reflect off, aka the mainstream model. UV radiation is what you need for phoroscent or flurencent lights sources
also, i am just going to assume it isnt biolumiencent since i doubt you think there are living things on the moon
i wonder why f.e's wont use spectrometer
i thought i mentioned that
What about them
you can figure out what emited the light
Fluorescence is light energy produced by a process wherehigh-energy radiation (such as ultraviolet or X-ray) is absorbed byelectrons surrounding an atom and is re-emitted as light energy. Phosphoresence is light energy produced by a particular typeof chemical reaction where the excess chemical energy of thereactants is given off as light energy. http://www.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_use_Phosphorescent_in_a_sentence
u did pepe
Chemical reaction
no
a chemical reaction emitting light is chemiluminsscent
the only differnce between fluresencet and phosphoresence is the time it takes for the energy to be realeased as light
the former is immediately and the latter is over time
Looks like something's happened that might make for an interesting debate. The main subreddit for the Qanon conspiracy was just banned.
<:ohheck:485078351162376202>
Lmao
I am just the messenger and don't want to debate I've got a long day ahead don't have the time
have a great day
Have a safe day my dear @I-VaPE-ChEMtrAiLS
had your roles messed up, you should be able to speak man
dang I just now seen this
@Deleted User no offence; nearly every aspect of what’s come from that sounds like its been positive; just I’ve come to see it a little differently. As in the wolf in sheep's clothes, the king of this world satan can warp reality; he’s the master of lie’s and deception. I believe by sedating the followers of christ till death in a “godly” embrace that he prevents them from seeking the divine expressions one can build to experience other worldly capabilities; that within this “I know that I know” system of reinforced beliefs/experiences he keeps those on the edge of divinity from justifying further invocations of your nature within/as a child of god.
Ah, there you are 😁
One of the greatest messages I’ve tried to grasp/come to terms with is how they say you can do all things through god/christ; as in within the mindset of justifications/empowerment “you” can do as he has done; as he said that blatantly. What I’ve done is looked into the systems of explanation/etc that provide a framework of building experiences that lead one to that state of christ like divinity; and have found its very real and nearly all “mainstream” theology/religion is based around distancing the practice from the preacher.
infact to no degree is society, well the hands behind its creation; formed our "reality" in a way to create minds that would never seek such things in the first place
@Mr.J I do see all things in this World through a spiritual lens. I understand skepticism as we have awakened to the tremendous lies of the enemy of our souls. I also see great freedom and beauty in realizing that I was born into a corrupt and sinful flesh that needed redemption. I, in myself am not divine. Reaching a place of divinity is placing us equal with CHRIST, and we are no such being.
“We” are not; as the we is a statement of ego/experience/duality; but understanding that “we” are an expression of divinity is not the same as saying we are no such being of christ like potential.