LGBP

@Dr.Wol Since all the + movements fail so consistently, adding feminism to racism, may actually murder it for good

Did you know if you rearrange lgbtq is spells autisticfuck

I could see a sassy verified posting LGBTFW

no more trannies, only gays and pedos

I welcome the racism+ idea

But not for the race supremacy reasons

@Uksio that was my plan all along 😉

now we gotta find a racist Steve Shives

hows Steve Shives's free time these days? maybe we can ask him to be our guy 🤔

Im suddenly in favor of net neutrality removal. Unemployed college students dont deserve the internet

haha

ikr

SJW's, the biggest argument against welfare

Maybe you should need a loicense

oi, you got a loicense for that jeauke?

Im trying my absolute hardest not to engage them but at the same time their tweets are just beyond retarded.

You got an internet loicense to use that Xbox mate?

Oi you got a job for that opinion m8?

Lol

not gonna lie, i used to be in favor for free education,


But SJW's and other art students took that charitable opinion away from me 😦

Education is never free

How to get popular on twitter:
1. Be a sassy black wamen
2. Sassy woke post about race and being a wamen

But. The sate sponsored alternative to the private education does keep the prices affordable

Which is proven to work in Germany and NL

The antifa left took my socialist ideas and now im a Nietzschen remorseless bastard. Pity and compassion are tools that the weak invented to hold the strong down

well that was the definition of free education in my case Uksio, NOTHING is free

They think genders a social construct. Dont get me started on empathy

and yes, education is cheap here in NL, i'm paying 2000 Euro per year

The state will tell you where to work in a few years

No need for edjumacation

I think the state has a duty of care to set the lowest bar for education, healthcare, banking and so on

thats why i'm planning to skip out to 'Murica after 😛

I.e. for the most vital areas

Why?

Nature doesnt give education

Nature doesnt give you healthcare

But it should never dictate with an iron fist to the free market there at all

if state doesn't give some minimum, you get India,

Do you want India?

We are animals.

Where the non-rich poop in the street

Oh no, he is an an-prim

fml, i learned that definition a week ago

They dont have cars

Its not a street

its paved for moving over

the romans didn't have cars either

Honestly its everyman for em self. Pity is a weakness.

https://i.imgur.com/4BfTiHR.gif

😛

Sunny was a beast. We have a tranny at work that looks like gail the snail

Im calling it gail for now on

I agree to some degree,

But if you go to far on the Ancap route, society will be too vulnerable

Crush the weak. Praise the strong

the problem with "every man for himself" is that theres no trust,
with no trust, theres no Unity,

Without unity, you will be overrun by those that ARE unified

Bring back spartan society

You can be unified through strength

unity through strength

Is unity through fear, and people who fear you, betray you when they see a chance

Its like an old philosophy. I dont believe in it all that much.

Work will make you free

Caesar was strong,

He made the Romans into an Empire,

He was stabbed in the back by his "allies" for it

No Nietzsche talks about perpetual war. Finding an enemy

And unifying through war

Celebrate the strong

yes, unifying people by giving them an enemy to fear, so they'll unite for you

Exactly

the issue though, is when you're the nations that are at the top,

People stop fearing an enemy

The war on terror left peoples minds before Bush's 2nd term was over

Because the enemy was crushed already

No shit thats why we have. radical commies running their mouths on twitter

exactly

Bush had to invade Iraq, and Obama had to make ISIS,

Just so the west had an "enemy" to fear

and now its the Russians again

No

in a sad attempt

CHIIIIINNNNNAAAAA

how much Media do you hear about "Muh China"

theres no such thing as Chineese bot accounts

Russia is the current Boogieman

actually we will weaponize communism 2.0

Your eu leaders

Itll be a big trend in the states not to trust eu people.

I would agree, if the EU leaders actually succeeded and gained power,

Instead, more and more people are tired of their bullshit,
People are tired of Migrants
With Brexit they are losing money to pay off things
Half of Europe is in open revolt,
and Putin has his fingers on the gas-valve on his discression

and muslim rape / pedo gangs everywhere

I mean we saved em twice in world wars and we got nothing to show for it except eu leaders crying that theyll have to pay more towards nato

that

And EU leaders crying that Trump demands the tariff lowered 😄

Then we seeing muzzies taking over their countries

"Oh no, you wanna have FAIR trade, YOU CAN'T DO THAT!!"

Muslim take over was my final straw. I had to learn about it. Its sick. Letting beautiful countries that our soldiers died to protect just get swept away by a make believe religion. Trump shouldve cut all ties to all of em. Theyre sick fucking puppies and the whole litter need to be put up against a wall and shot

Its a horrible sickness

why you think i wanna bail to 'murica?

The leaders of the EU watch the Muslims murder/rape people, and they thank their muslim masters for it

and no, your solution would destroy NATO, which weakens the US

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6029375/Trade-exports-hit-record-high-ministers-say-good-sign-countrys-future-post-Brexit.html

Brexit is gonna work out, damn

I was wrong

Has it happened yet?

Brexit?

Id leave for the US, but I think ill stick around and fix what I got here.

Id call it the most progressive muslim majority nation in the world. While its like being first in the special olympics, there is a chance for change.

It's never easy to predict a market, if it were we would all have millions

This was....Interesting.
https://youtu.be/1VwpwP_fIqY

Is this....A picture of mohammed?

😐

I leave for a few minutes and ... NIETZSCHE!

Goddamit

Brexit is not gonna work out, anything you see before it actually happens is... irrelevant...

I drew a monster made out of worms.

As one does.

I hope an illustration of a monster made out of worms can contribute to your day.

The chances are that it won't. But as long as there's a chance that it will, it will have been worth it.

Worms are for the birds.

if i cut it in two, will it be two monsters made out of worms? 🤔

Nah, the worms would be seperate from the spawn-nucleus at that point.

Sound terrifying. I find worms absolutely vile

Mgalekgolo?

Had to google that.

The hunters. o:

Oh wow I had no idea that's how they worked.

Snowden posted something interesting

"If you want to see what a politician is truly saying, remove the irrelevant emotional terms."

Sorry, bit of a nerd

Also that is interesting

I imagine that applies to anything

Kevin Bolk made me vigilant to clickbait

emotional terms like what?

Pokemon go to the polls?

"Never trust an article that tells you what you're about to think about it."

heres another edgy wiselord quote

Any headline with a question can be answered with "No" or something

Doesn’t Tim use that?

yeah

Beatrice's Law of Headlines or something its called

Betteridge*

I realize the more laws we make, the more they backfire, but

Clickbait headlines are a scourge.

They need to fuck off.

nah, laws aren't meant to be bad

But stupid people MAKING laws make bad laws

God, yes those "you'll be astonished by" and "and why that's a good thing" headlines immediately make me want to disagree, and I never get to find out if I actually disagree because I refuse to give them my click

And you'll never believe what happened next.

You'll never believe a clickbait headline again!

Click here to find out why

@Dr.Wol What I was saying was.. Clickbait is such a HAZARD, I could see the argument for outlawing them.

I bet I can: You got halfway through the article and a video started autoplaying and following your scroll and it's not even related to the article

But then I'd also realize "Wow enforcement would be a fucking disaster."

clickbait isn't a hazard,

People should just know better

People are busy.

I'm wise to all the shit now because I've spent so much time in the atmosphere.

if you wanna outlaw the construction of sentences, you need to re-examine your priorities 😦

exactly,

People should learn to avoid it

and if they don't, thats just natural selection

They should, but they don't/won't/can't.

Its like these trigger warnings etc

Well, how is it natural selection..?

When their ignorance gets to thrive?

It's not like those of us wise to this nonsense are the ones awarded with riches and babies.

When you coddle them by keeping away false headlines

people won't know it when it happens again

and they'll believe it

Most of these sites seem to be dying and this level of clickbait is just their death knell as they spiral further down into irrelevancy

better to let them know false headlines exist so they can make up their minds

Hopefully something better can rise from the ashes

Its like trigger warnings,

If you block "clickbait" by law,

Soon you'll have people screetching in a fetal position because of some headline that got through

"You made a No-no headline! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

Yeah, I'm not comfortable with any sanctions being placed by the government on what the media is allowed to report.

Sounds too succeptible to corruption, or just poorly thought out legislature

There have to be ashes first.

We need more Hulk Hogan cases.

Seeing gawker's properties being passed around like a hot potato while everyone sees their brand recognition but fails to monetize it is the purest of schadenfreud

Heres the issue

If people believe in lies, they become ignorant of the subject and will only be manipulated with what they believe
If you censor the world, they become ignorant of the world, and can have their beliefs manipulated

either way, you'll have stupid people

Suppose we just hang the former head of gawker from a streetlight.

Just hang him, straight up.

Also it's a question of *who* is allowed to decide what's censored. What I think would be good to censor is different from what others would, so who am I to say what's right, and why would I trust that what they say is right?

you're asking the difference between

What is True
and What is Fact

How does quality control get encouraged when BULLSHIT makes all the money?

It takes time for the bullshit to ruin society, but it CLEARLY HAS

I don't think there's an easy answer here

society needs its ups and downs

If society gets ruined, the weak will die off, and the strong build a better society

Well I'd be considered weak.

@Dr.Wol you were referring to
"If a headline ends with a question mark, it can be answered with 'No.'"

yes i was abe

I'm not misinformed. But I am weak. I'm very poor.

@Dr.Wol you were referring to
"If a headline ends with a question mark, it can be answered with 'No.'"

I'm a good person who enjoys the truth, and spreading it. But I'd die with this wave we speak of.

So is that really the solution?

how so?

are you gonna cry for mommy when you see a trigger warning?

...?

What kind of response was that?

Try again.

When the communists come for you, are you gonna try and survive them?

Or will you tell them "you can't do that!" as they tie you to a post and load their rifles to execute you for not being communist enough

Like "Is Trump Hitler?"

Or "Does James Mattis want war with Iran?"

Well, hold on. What will I be able to do about it?

I don't know anyone in my area.

What are you both talking about?

I've never owned a gun and don't own the capital to buy one.

i'm not saying what you'll be able to do about it

I'm saying that the current brand of SJW's, love communists, until they find out what it really is, and by that time, they'll only screetch at these people that they can't be mean

As they're gonna get executed cuz their use has ran out

I don't think this is a very realistic scenario at any currently forseeable future at least in the US.

Weakness isn't bound to physical strength, or capability

better question

It's bound more to money than anything.

And being that as it is, I am weak

If we met IRL

And i drew a knife at you and started lunging it at you

Will you stand still and tell me "You can't do that!" as i cut out parts of you?

Or will you try to NOT be stabbed?

Okay.

You have this conversation in such a stupid way.

Why do you use THAT to ask what I would do?

When during this conversation have I gone "I tell people to STOP and they STOP!"

Because he's trying to lead you to give the answer he wants

So goddamn stupid. Shut up.

because the current brand of "weak" people, would legit stand still and tell me "you can't do that" as i murder them

You haven't been listening.

and you haven't been answering, so i guess you're right, you'd be weak cuz you'd stand there and ponder the situation

Who would actually do that? This is such an absurdly false equivalency

Me not answering your question is not me answering the question with "I'd stall"

No, I'm attacking the stupidity of your question.

Is that what you'd say to a person trying to kill you?

"You're being stupid"

You're being stupid by asking me what I'd say to a person trying to kill me.

How's that.

No one is currently trying to kill her ya dingaling

gee, an internet question being harmless, who knew?

```are you gonna cry for mommy when you see a trigger warning?```

yes

Remember this hokey bullshit?

Words like 'mommy' and 'trigger warning'?

What prompted that?

Thats what college kids literally do right now

Why did you respond to *me* with that, fucknut?

It was a question, would you act like a SJW to a dangerous situation

Again.

Why are you asking me that.

Cuz you said you'd probably be considered weak

So i asked how would you respond to such situations

After declaring strength to be more tied to money than anything.

See this is what I was saying when I said you weren't listening,

You ass.

If strength were tied to Money, how did Donald Trump win the election when he spent less than half of what Hillary did on the campaign

That is by far and away the worst analogy in the world.

They're both super rich.

and yet, the one with less money spent, turned out a stronger candidate

https://twitter.com/KSAmofaEN/status/1026241377867321345?s=19

THEY'RE BOTH SUPER RICH.

https://twitter.com/KSAmofaEN/status/1026242184222318593?s=19

@Timcast

THEY'RE IN THE SAME HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION BECAUSE OF WEALTH AND FAME.

WORST. ANALOGY. ON EARTH.

Just say the idea you're trying to put forward rather than this poorly done socratic method shit man.

Yes, there are different ways to be strong in different situations we know that.

well, you understood it atleast

Because it's incredibly basic and hardly relevant to what the discussion was

what do you think the discussion was?

Sorry if I'm being a bit rude, I should probably go to bed now seeing as it's 7 am

I don't fucking know at this point