Idk if it was hyperbole or my misunderstanding but I remember news reporting that Indy business we're putting signs out that said no gays allowed when a bill allowing the businesses some room in that regards

From what I remember news was reporting that the businesses were doing that

However it never had happened and I can't find the old articles anymore

This was like 3-6 years ago

@ExceptionalFeather tim talked about a site that archives the news stories from the editing i forgot what it was called @Timcast

newsdiffs.org

You could prob find it there

they dont get em all though

There it is

Some news sites block archiving though that’s why it doesnt get all of then

That's another scummy practice

"People were pointing out how shitty we are, so we made it so they can't do that any more"

I wonder why news orgs would want to block that 🤔

Oh, I'm sure it's some mundane reason that anybody on the street would agree with.

Good tool though, bookmarking for sure.

To protect thier “credibility”

To “change” history

Tim said this before , You google Richard Spencer in the UK , you can’t find anything racist about him or something like that . History gets scrubbed

Serious question, and I get the hyperbole, but at what points is the media the enemy of the people

is it when they doxx people

is it when they stealh edit articles

they are the ministry of truth

is it when they are more op-ed vs actual journalism

is it when they are more activism than journalism

is it when they have backchannels to a single campaign and unilaterally agree to get that campaign elected

is it when they have a backchannel to decide the collective narrative

i'm pretty sure real investigative journalist have always been a rare breed that usually ended up being freelance and just trying to sell their story to papers, rather than work for them.

and that's usually local news

like the trope of the corrupt new paper is old as dirt

Lotheron, I'd say it's at whatever point they stop reporting on the news and start into activism

I know this has probably been said a million times before, but why is it that when I agree with a liberal on something (doesn't matter what it is, could literally be anything) that's posted on twitter, they immediately turn around and attack me as well?

It is absolutely confounding

purity test

They went straight for the throat with some great ad hominem attacks

it was fantastic

-_-

wait, if that one person's twitter, "your friend helen", is saying you need to include your "alt-right" source for calling Jeong racist, and its her own tweets that are the source, isn't this person calling Jeong alt-right (and therefore racist)?

A saying B required to prove C
A made B
Therefore A proves C

not sure if that's airtight, but yeah. sounds like it.

the flaw is the definition of racism, but before the stealth edits, it was lefty sources calling them racist.

and she apologized for them

which, as people pointed out, why apologize for something she didn't do

i mean, besides being asian and therefore needing to be sorry for oppressing everyone

even whites, ironically.

Apologizing for something is a pretty good admission of guilt in my book

again, not airtight, but pretty telling.

Apologizing for something is a pretty good admission of guilt in my book

Apologizing means you knew it was wrong yet you still did it

besides, what idiot organization would want someone that tainted on their staff

Lol facebook block the website to download free guns

yeah, because that will stop people

streisand effect

exactly

But facebook is labeling the link as either dangerous content or spam

Lol

You can prob share a real spam link and it would be ok

If there's any shred of truth to this...

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1025071229835927554

Im constantly amazed how these companies tout themselves being a open platform yet they censor shit constantly , America gave them a place to thrive yet they disrespect the values that made america .... America

I need to write a book

"Art of the Pendulum"

Lol

Nice title

Tim needs to write a book , id buy the fuck out of it

Art of the Beanie, By Tim Pool

Lmao ^ 😂

Wapo asking the hard hitting questions

yeah becuase so many ppl are uninformed

that YES it is completely fine to make fun of white ppl online

I agree its ok to make fun of white people but id like to add its also ok to make fun of all other people that are colored also

More like, if you want to make fun of people, make sure you have no hard feelings if they do the same to you

nah no one can make fun of wypipo

we mastur raise

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjkGsGcVsAAf-i-.jpg

I think theres a difference between criticism and straight up insulting.

you srsly gonna criticise a dying kid?

"you're not doing it right, here leme show you"
🔫

"heres the best way to do it"

Gibs me dat -hungry santa

where did Shivangi go btw, she been silent for days

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>

Idk i cant summon her ?

I pm’d her

now u gonna die

that shift in black approval ratings has got to have people shitting themselves in the democrat hierarchy.

NOW IS MY CHANCE TO RISE AND PUSH OUT SHIV FROM THE RACE FOR NUMBAH 1

idk shes prolly got school shit to do

noob

learnin da edjyumacayshun n shiiiiiet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUSlot-3hSs

place 2 maybe Julz

I'm the nr.1! 😛

In her life, Sarah Jeong has lusted after multiple white men. Fully zero of them ever fucked her. Many of them ended up fucking white women instead.

This severely embittered poor Sarah Jeong.

But being serious, sexual competition is a major factor in racism. Think how cross-gender racism is rare. Men are racist to other men but happily embrace the women of that race and the same goes for women.

I disagree.

Well, sort of.

Keep in mind, Sarah Jeong made statements against white men as well.

BBC refused to comment