Im fine with them hiring jeoung but defending her and lying about it is disgusting

Idk if it was hyperbole or my misunderstanding but I remember news reporting that Indy business we're putting signs out that said no gays allowed when a bill allowing the businesses some room in that regards

From what I remember news was reporting that the businesses were doing that

However it never had happened and I can't find the old articles anymore

This was like 3-6 years ago

@ExceptionalFeather tim talked about a site that archives the news stories from the editing i forgot what it was called @Timcast

newsdiffs.org

You could prob find it there

they dont get em all though

There it is

Some news sites block archiving though that’s why it doesnt get all of then

That's another scummy practice

"People were pointing out how shitty we are, so we made it so they can't do that any more"

I wonder why news orgs would want to block that 🤔

Oh, I'm sure it's some mundane reason that anybody on the street would agree with.

Good tool though, bookmarking for sure.

To protect thier “credibility”

To “change” history

Tim said this before , You google Richard Spencer in the UK , you can’t find anything racist about him or something like that . History gets scrubbed

Serious question, and I get the hyperbole, but at what points is the media the enemy of the people

is it when they doxx people

is it when they stealh edit articles

they are the ministry of truth

is it when they are more op-ed vs actual journalism

is it when they are more activism than journalism

is it when they have backchannels to a single campaign and unilaterally agree to get that campaign elected

is it when they have a backchannel to decide the collective narrative

i'm pretty sure real investigative journalist have always been a rare breed that usually ended up being freelance and just trying to sell their story to papers, rather than work for them.

and that's usually local news

like the trope of the corrupt new paper is old as dirt

Lotheron, I'd say it's at whatever point they stop reporting on the news and start into activism

I know this has probably been said a million times before, but why is it that when I agree with a liberal on something (doesn't matter what it is, could literally be anything) that's posted on twitter, they immediately turn around and attack me as well?

It is absolutely confounding

purity test

They went straight for the throat with some great ad hominem attacks

it was fantastic

-_-

wait, if that one person's twitter, "your friend helen", is saying you need to include your "alt-right" source for calling Jeong racist, and its her own tweets that are the source, isn't this person calling Jeong alt-right (and therefore racist)?

A saying B required to prove C
A made B
Therefore A proves C

not sure if that's airtight, but yeah. sounds like it.

the flaw is the definition of racism, but before the stealth edits, it was lefty sources calling them racist.