red-pill
Discord ID: 392859865221038090
1,380 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/14
| Next
It could also ruin him for relationships forever.
But he's so blind. And he might refuse anyone telling him how fucked up the whole situation is and he should leave her. At that point, it seems like it may be destiny that his purpose is to be an example of brainwashing and moral corruption.
Don't be like Larry. That's the ultimate lesson.
it gets worse. from the same group chat: "made fun of Rick. instantly Dara with the ... typing symbol.
>ohboi
Dara talking about how one of the maintnence guys flirts with her when Rick isnt there.
you're telling me some guys wait until a girl's boyfriend isnt around to make their move
SOUNDS FAMILIAR."
When you can describe an almost completely racially homogenous cast and crew as diverse just as long as they're not white. Leftism: not even once.
Wonder who's financing the movie ๐ค
Disney
Sorry, *(((Disney)))
We gotta push how problematic Wakanda is.
It actually is if you're a pan-African nationalist. Because the scramble for Africa still happens in the Marvel universe, and Wakanda basically just hides behind their space magic walls and tells the entire rest of the continent to suck it. I'd be surprised if all the other African peoples didn't viscerally hate Wakanda
Yeah, it's one of those things that as far as I know gets glossed over in the comics.
Wakanda is a country of xenophobic nationalists. But it's ok when they do it?
initially I thought the main antagonist was going to be someone from another country who hates Wakanda, but apparently he's just an exile who's bootyblasted
oh, no. the movie was in danger of having some depth
I've got a whole plot outline for a white black panther, but nobody would ever buy it.
Alright Grumps you got me sold! What's the plot?
Super short version: T'Challa tries to call out president notTrump who later lights him up on twitter about Wakanda having a wall. This coincides with a country that neighbors Wakanda (notZimbabwe) undergoing a great social upheval. T'Challa takes in a bunch of escaping refugees. White refugees specifically. Among them is a young man who has a fairly standard hero set up. Highly intelligent, etc. The taking in on refugees triggers social issues within Wakanda itself. This finally leads to T'Challa passing the mantle of the Black Panther on to this kid as a sign of a new era for the nation. As well as seperating the Black Panther persona from the Wakanda Royal bloodline.
I personally would read it, but Marvel would never let that happen
I know. Even though it diversifies the country and champions the cause of refugees.
Now a days diversity means anti white really
Anywho what was everyone's first red pill?
Feminists are rabid cunts. That was my first redpill
My introduction into how batshit feminism was came from my history teacher.
We were talking about civil right movements from across the world and someone brought up feminism and asked the teacher her opinion.
Told the class that feminists got too much power too quickly and couldn't handle it after telling us about a time her car broke down and a guy pulled over and asked if she'd be offended if he offered to help her. This was in the late 90s too.
Lmao
Mine oddly enough was Fox news
It was the only place where religious people or conservatives were not being unfairly mocked or slandered
And yes I know fox sucks and has is bias but no where near as bad as the other main stream media outlets
Than Alex Jones did the rest
Ooga Booga, we wuz britons 'n' shieeeet
black panther was hilarious
one of the tribes of Wakanda uses gorillas as their motif and they hoot like monkeys in several scenes
just like real life!
in fact, while watching the movie
Boy, do I love stale 3 year old memes like "what are those?" (I wish I was making this up.)
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
It's almost as if gun control doesn't work or something.
it's almost like if people really want to kill someone, life... uh... finds a way
What I wonder why is why school shootings are mostly an American thing while it never happens in places like Latin America
People steal weapons off military bases all the time in Argentina and Brazil
Negligent parenting and wanting fame in the worst way possible are 2 reasons I can think of.
weird culture of repression is another
of what?
Your feelings?
more of physical activity.
kids don't go out and play as much anymore because it's seen as a liability. there's more stuff like that, but it all compounds to make a society that makes very fragile children
That possibly explains why they only occured since 1989
kids don't know how to lose anymore
they don't know how to fail with grace because we're too scared to let them fail in smaller ways. so much so, that when they get older, and the stakes get bigger, and we can't protect them any longer from the consequences of their failure, it hits them like a freight train.
Holy shit, I haven't seen that other face before. Still just as hideous
Flagrant Clickbait.
You've got to be kidding me with this shit. Build the wall yesterday, motherfucker.
It was less than half of total offenders though. That means something, if you close your eyes, and feel bad for all the people that came here over a decade ago, and never once tried to apply for citizenship.
itโs financially unfair for men to get married, goy
think of the cost-benefit analysis of loving someone
Teachers too
It's because society is geared to teach whites and males they need to be objective about things. While at the same time the deeper into the progressive stack you are the more biased you are allowed to act and that's okay.
yeah I watched it and I can see that
I mean, he's not a real pope
When's poland going to elect an antipope? There's historical precedence for it.
Antipope?
What on earth is that?
The Orthodox Patriarch?
There are multiple orthodox patriarchs
@ebowden from 1309 to 1376, seven successive popes decided to make their seat at Avignon.
In 1376, Gregory IX decided to move back to Rome, but his cardinals disagreed. Which led to the Western Schism under the reign of his successor, Urban VI
A second line of Avignon popes reigned, concurrent with those serving in Rome.
At one point during the schism, no less than three different men simultaneously led claim to the title of true pope
The seat of the pope was not even initially so prominent in christendom. The heir to the throne of St. Peter was but one of five church fathers before the reign of Charlemagne and the crusades.
So what you're saying is, there has never been a true pope?
we are all the pope
There's only been a "true pope" (the word pope itself comes from papa, denoting one of the five church fathers) for as long as the Latin Church was able to establish its will by military force, but the bishop of Rome derives his legitimacy from being the heir of St. Peter
Who Jesus declared was the "rock" (Petrus) on which the church would be built.
What I'm getting from this was that He was being metaphorical?
Somewhat. I doubt he would have wanted a singular office to become so entrenched and corrupt or to hold so much individual power.
But he definitely wanted Peter to lead the church after he was gone.
And I doubt Peter wanted for the bishopric of Rome to become the way it is.
Leave it to us to screw everything up as always
I bet this is what led to that baseless Mary worship also. She's important and is to be revered, but she's not part of the trinity.
Well, the Latin Church isn't all to blame for that. The Eastern Orthodox Church does it too.
Oh bother
But they have the weird practice of icons
Hell, I'm technically prot, yet I still recognize the saints as they helped to advance the faith. Praying to them however is idolatry imo
@Orwell & Goode
Sorry to bother, but i figured you had a better overview over the news.
Wasn't there an article that detailed google's involvement in the Clinton Campaign?
1,380 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/14
| Next