Message from @Sellis
Discord ID: 685203584459210779
KUNG FLU
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
And if you get pneumonia and kidney failure you probably won't be strolling on down to the hospital
Kidney failure only occurs if you get the virus in your blood, which is bad news with any virus.
@Jeremy-Retard you're not considering how highly mutagenic and infectious it is. That's what gives it the potential to be dangerous. If everyone gets sick and one in five people need a hospital, the death toll will skyrocket. This is totally neglecting the impact to international trade and travel
I'm not suggesting there's no danger.
My job is already dealing with supply chain disruption caused by this, and I'm certain the world economy will re-shape to a large degree as a result. But as far as the actual illness is concerned, this isn't a world-ender at this point. It's just a bad illness that we should do what we can to avoid spreading to the vulnerable populations.
https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.015
Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality
in humans as they do in other animals?
Given the fact that Sargon was talking about Australian preteens taking puberty blockers, I guess I have to post this again. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277539512000982
```This article argues that the emerging practice of transgendering children should be seen as a form of gender eugenics which has similarities with the practice of sexual surgeries carried out as a result of eugenics ideas in the early twentieth century. In the earlier period those suffering severe poverty, homosexuals, criminals, people with mental health problems and disabilities, and gypsies were sterilized. Presently, in Australia, children as young as 10 who are identified as suffering from ‘gender identity disorder’ are, with the connivance of the Family Court, placed on puberty delaying drugs. These drugs, if they are followed at age 16 with cross-sex hormones, sterilize the children. The similarities between earlier eugenics practices and the transgenderism of the present include the origin of the practices in the ideas of sex scientists, psychiatrists, biologists and endocrinologists, one of the target groups, lesbians and gays, support by ‘progressive’ sections of society, including some on the Left and some feminists.```
And it was written by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheila_Jeffreys
http://theconversation.com/eugenics-and-the-practice-of-transgendering-children-3838
```The Australian case
The transgendering of children in Australia is usually requested by the parents or guardians of the children and then carried out by the Family Court. The 13 year old
girl called “Alex” was transgendered through the Family Court in 2004.
More recently in April 2011, “Jamie”, a 10 year old boy who had been diagnosed with gender identity disorder at the age of 7, was transgendered.
Jamie was described in the court as “a very attractive young girl with long blonde hair” - that he conformed really well with cultural stereotypes of what a girl should look like.
Jamie’s parents gave the necessary evidence to prove that Jamie had the disorder. He had identified as a girl at two years old, selected toys usually associated with girls and chose girls as friends. According to his mother, the “turning point” was when Jamie wanted to wear a “ball gown” on an outing to see Phantom of the Opera.```
Some people in this chat support eugenics I dont see how this is wrong. It is just research bro. <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> <:slurpgon:583424900732157956> <:sarGOY:462286263622303754> 🦀 <:CrabRave:590859147541741583> <:coolgon:549370575701803019>
If you support not giving birth to kids with genetic defects, you support Eugenics.
I dont support Eugenics, I support genetic modification <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> <:powerful:595334910764515338> <:powerful:595334910764515338>
Unless you give a pregnant girl a beer, you're a Eugenicist just like Hitler
"not giving birth to kids with genetic defects" can be more then one thing.
off the top of my head it could be:
Repairing any genetic defects before birth
OR
aborting the child (with out consent of the mother in the worst case)
One of these is ok, the other is the first step down a dark road.
Still, if we as humans are presuming that we know which DNA is best for human evolution, to the point that we will pick and choose which gets expressed, we are essentially eugenicists. Not that I think this is bad, it's fine. It's just that people get upset at the word.
>By Narzanin Massoumi
```She is the author of Muslim Women, Social Movements and the 'War on Terror'```
```Narzanin Massoumi has a PhD in sociology from the University of Bristol. ```
https://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/same-parents-different-ancestry
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2018/03/dna-ancestry-test-siblings-different-results-genetics-science/
Not a particularly great study itself, just important thing to know.
"DNA isn’t passed down from generation to generation in a single block. Not every child gets the same 50% of mom’s DNA and 50% of dad’s DNA. (Unless of course they are identical twins).
This has consequences in terms of how much DNA siblings share. And even more significantly, what DNA they share. "
Is this code for “a lot of parents aren’t loyal?”
wait...what?
women can get WORSE at math!?
wtf is this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-51751915
>90% biased against
>50% of the world is women
The article is the most barebones thing I've ever read
Well I am biased against women, it's just that I can back up my bias with facts <:smugon:512048583806025739>
human are womens <:thunk:462282216467333140>
>90% of people are anti-women
>50% of the population are women
>80% of women are anti-women
(this is assuming that 100% of men are anti-women because I doubt the ideology would argue anything different)
😔 <:tiptip:462282246695419934>
It's a completely made up claim for sure
@Swedishmafia101 That's some MSNBC maths right there, pal.
Shit I fucked up
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck @Goddess Tyche ***or did I?***