Message from @Jeremy-Retard

Discord ID: 683526294797025332


2020-02-26 21:37:33 UTC  

<:poggers:583775485620781087>

2020-02-26 21:52:59 UTC  

>gay retards high IQ BIOWEAPON LMAO
@snake EZ GG just copy your message and paste it in a new message

2020-02-28 05:54:31 UTC  

How big a potato we talking

2020-02-28 05:55:33 UTC  

And why do people do things like this with food

2020-02-28 05:57:01 UTC  

Because people see food lihe this as inherently disposable

2020-02-28 06:01:48 UTC  

I mean I wouldn't say putting any sized potato up your butt is a good idea, call me crazy

2020-02-28 13:27:39 UTC  

If by "cure" you mean "rupture" then definitely put a potato up your ass to cure haemorrhoids.

2020-02-28 14:27:36 UTC  

i mean hemorrhoids are swolen veins, so bursting them technically makes it not a hemorrhoid anymore

2020-02-28 14:28:41 UTC  

arguably something worse, but its not hemorrhoids anymore

2020-02-28 14:29:08 UTC  

it could get infected but sure

2020-02-28 21:21:14 UTC  

Dont tell me how to solve my problems <a:REEE:586628142391885843>

2020-02-28 22:35:13 UTC  

I think that article is targetted at gavin

2020-02-29 07:54:22 UTC  

Something tells me a bloody infected potato anus isn’t the most convenient

2020-02-29 08:09:04 UTC  

maybe its the potato in your anus

2020-02-29 22:28:29 UTC  

Honestly, doesn't sound too bad for most people.
That dude is 60 and barely needed medical attention the entire time.

2020-03-01 03:01:29 UTC  

Just seems like the flu for initial symptoms

2020-03-01 03:02:31 UTC  

KUNG FLU

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

2020-03-01 03:02:43 UTC  

And if you get pneumonia and kidney failure you probably won't be strolling on down to the hospital

2020-03-01 04:09:27 UTC  

Kidney failure only occurs if you get the virus in your blood, which is bad news with any virus.

2020-03-01 16:41:28 UTC  

@Jeremy-Retard you're not considering how highly mutagenic and infectious it is. That's what gives it the potential to be dangerous. If everyone gets sick and one in five people need a hospital, the death toll will skyrocket. This is totally neglecting the impact to international trade and travel

2020-03-01 17:15:47 UTC  

I'm not suggesting there's no danger.

2020-03-01 17:17:18 UTC  

My job is already dealing with supply chain disruption caused by this, and I'm certain the world economy will re-shape to a large degree as a result. But as far as the actual illness is concerned, this isn't a world-ender at this point. It's just a bad illness that we should do what we can to avoid spreading to the vulnerable populations.

2020-03-02 04:25:36 UTC  

https://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.015
Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality
in humans as they do in other animals?

2020-03-03 13:27:18 UTC  

Given the fact that Sargon was talking about Australian preteens taking puberty blockers, I guess I have to post this again. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277539512000982

2020-03-03 13:28:21 UTC  

```This article argues that the emerging practice of transgendering children should be seen as a form of gender eugenics which has similarities with the practice of sexual surgeries carried out as a result of eugenics ideas in the early twentieth century. In the earlier period those suffering severe poverty, homosexuals, criminals, people with mental health problems and disabilities, and gypsies were sterilized. Presently, in Australia, children as young as 10 who are identified as suffering from ‘gender identity disorder’ are, with the connivance of the Family Court, placed on puberty delaying drugs. These drugs, if they are followed at age 16 with cross-sex hormones, sterilize the children. The similarities between earlier eugenics practices and the transgenderism of the present include the origin of the practices in the ideas of sex scientists, psychiatrists, biologists and endocrinologists, one of the target groups, lesbians and gays, support by ‘progressive’ sections of society, including some on the Left and some feminists.```

2020-03-03 13:29:25 UTC  
2020-03-03 13:31:56 UTC  

http://theconversation.com/eugenics-and-the-practice-of-transgendering-children-3838

```The Australian case

The transgendering of children in Australia is usually requested by the parents or guardians of the children and then carried out by the Family Court. The 13 year old
girl called “Alex” was transgendered through the Family Court in 2004.

More recently in April 2011, “Jamie”, a 10 year old boy who had been diagnosed with gender identity disorder at the age of 7, was transgendered.

Jamie was described in the court as “a very attractive young girl with long blonde hair” - that he conformed really well with cultural stereotypes of what a girl should look like.

Jamie’s parents gave the necessary evidence to prove that Jamie had the disorder. He had identified as a girl at two years old, selected toys usually associated with girls and chose girls as friends. According to his mother, the “turning point” was when Jamie wanted to wear a “ball gown” on an outing to see Phantom of the Opera.```

Some people in this chat support eugenics I dont see how this is wrong. It is just research bro. <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> <:slurpgon:583424900732157956> <:sarGOY:462286263622303754> 🦀 <:CrabRave:590859147541741583> <:coolgon:549370575701803019>

2020-03-03 14:09:52 UTC  

If you support not giving birth to kids with genetic defects, you support Eugenics.

I dont support Eugenics, I support genetic modification <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608> <:powerful:595334910764515338> <:powerful:595334910764515338>

2020-03-03 14:31:28 UTC  

Unless you give a pregnant girl a beer, you're a Eugenicist just like Hitler

2020-03-03 14:32:40 UTC  

"not giving birth to kids with genetic defects" can be more then one thing.
off the top of my head it could be:
Repairing any genetic defects before birth
OR
aborting the child (with out consent of the mother in the worst case)

One of these is ok, the other is the first step down a dark road.

2020-03-03 14:36:18 UTC  

Still, if we as humans are presuming that we know which DNA is best for human evolution, to the point that we will pick and choose which gets expressed, we are essentially eugenicists. Not that I think this is bad, it's fine. It's just that people get upset at the word.

2020-03-06 18:55:08 UTC  

>By Narzanin Massoumi