Message from @Eden
Discord ID: 690270615919525891
According to some people, there was a primate in the Balkans that could have lead to the various species that lead to humans, however it just as easily could have been an offshoot of later what turned in to humans, rather than be what humans evolved from. And that was 7 million years ago, and it looked like a monkey, being still covered in fur at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graecopithecus
There's no genetic proof and it's entirely possible it's an offshoot that evolved similiar teeth structures given it just so happened to eat the same food
The earliest humans were around about 200,000 years ago, and this was around like 7 million. It's not really possible this was the first human, at best it would be an extremely distant ancestor, even cro magnon man is closer
The more interesting group of people are the Ainu, who are closely related to early Europeans and Cro Magnon man, but have small groups in Asia, including Japan. Most of them bread out, but just by looking at them, you can tell they don't look very Japanese, and grow large beards. It's kind of super interesting
A craniometric study by Brace et al. (2001) shows a closer morphological relation of the Ainu and Jōmon people to prehistoric and modern Europeans rather than to other contemporary East Asians. The study concludes that the Jōmon and Ainu people are descendants of a population (dubbed "Eurasians" by Brace et al.) that moved into northern Eurasia (and also the Americas) in the Late Pleistocene, which significantly predates the expansion of the modern core population of East Asia
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Hokkaido_Ainu.jpg
A Japanese man apparently O.O
And MtDNA indicates Africa 150-250M. Which is a lot more conclusive than fossil evidence.
Yes, which is definitive and easy to track across existing populations as well, which makes it kind of obvious
Well yeah that's why they use MtDNA because it's not recombinant. Spermatozoa do not have Mitochondria.
@everybodydothatdinosaur Well, the picture says he's an Ainu from Hokkaido. That island has been inhabited by a group of people genetically very different from the weebanese. They're closer to the siberian tribes
Also the japs, in their usual superiority, saw them as low life barbarians that need to be either repressed or forced into nip culture, resulting in basically second class citizen status
This guy reminds me of some actor.
Kurt fucking Russell, LMAO
Escape from Sapporo <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
Early Cro magnon man with square jaw, actually he reminds me of that photoshopped smiling guy
oh nooooo! you cant kill the islamists! nooo!
civilians die in the war against radical islam? noooooooo!
Moral of the story: dont be islamists
Also why is Australia/USA risking the lifes of these operatives? You can safely drone bomb these villages until they give up the radical islamists
or until the desert is painted red
It must be defeated, and we do not have to sacrifice our own soldiers to do it.
nukes
you see, as much as i am sorrowful to my wayward followers, i do not like to see excess cruelty
Nukes will only get you radical islamic anime
nukes will scare the muslims into submission
and grant death to those who want to die in the name of allah. I dont see the issue
The best part about nukes for Muslims is that cremation is considered haram.
Which, in my book, is another argument for me favouring nukes as a method of cleaning up some of that semite filth from the world.
True
@Goddess Tyche Just be careful the ADL doesn't hear you or they'll wait until you're done killing muslims and then complain that they're semites too and therefore killing muslims is antisemitic.
Well, it is.
Arabic is a semitic (devilish) language.
if this is true, we should ban democracy, change my mind https://youtu.be/pvz8K8S9aPo
I see the shit posting is strong today
@gNightrow You just happened to be unlucky enough to post right before me. I was commenting on the conversation before you posted that
I guess your within the 90%
Banning democracy isn't gonna help that 10% and even if you're in a dictatorship it won't change the fact the dictator himself could end up like the 90%. Instead let them be free to do what they want so they can provide the most optimal results.
Long live the 1%
Which one.
the 1% is within the 10%